Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection

Journal of Applied Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 467-480

  Long, Nanye ^a   Gianola, Daniel ^a,b   Rosa, Guilherme J M ^a,b   Weigel, Kent A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Estimated genomic breeding values; Long term; Selection

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 80053636030     PISSN: 12341983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13353-011-0053-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abasht B, Sandford E, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Hassen A, Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC, Lamont SJ (2009) Extent and consistency of linkage disequilibrium and identification of DNA markers for production and egg quality traits in commercial layer chicken populations. BMC Genomics 10(Suppl 2): S2.
2. Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 105(943): 201-211.
3. Crow JF (2008) Maintaining evolvability. J Genet 87: 349-353.
4. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2010) The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185(3): 1021-1031.
5. de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E, Weigel KA, Cotes JM (2009) Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182(1): 375-385.
6. Dekkers JCM, van Arendonk JAM (1998) Optimizing selection for quantitative traits with information on an identified locus in outbred populations. Genet Res 71(3): 257-275.
7. Fernando RL (2009) Genomic selection: Bayesian methods. Animal Breeding & Genetics Short Courses, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
8. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando RL (2009) Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183: 347-363.
9. Gibson JP (1994) Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection on identified loci. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Canada, 7-12 August 1994, pp 201-204.
10. Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136(2): 245-257.
11. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177(4): 2389-2397.
12. Hill WG (2010) Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1537): 73-85.
13. Jannink J-L (2010) Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 42: 35.
14. Meuwissen T, Goddard M (2010) Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185(2): 623-631.
15. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4): 1819-1829.
16. Muir WM (2007) Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124(6): 342-355.
17. Park T, Casella G (2008) The Bayesian Lasso. J Am Stat Assoc 103: 681-686.
18. Slatkin M (2008) Linkage disequilibrium-understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat Rev Genet 9(6): 477-485.
19. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE (2008) Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J Anim Sci 86: 2447-2454.
20. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Odegard J, Meuwissen THE (2009) Persistence of accuracy of genome-wide breeding values over generations when including a polygenic effect. Genet Sel Evol 41: 53.
21. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE (2009) Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol 41: 37.
22. Spelman RJ, Garrick DL (1997) Utilisation of marker assisted selection in a commercial dairy cow population. Livest Prod Sci 47: 139-147.
23. Villanueva B, Dekkers JCM, Woolliams JA, Settar P (2004) Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 82: 1305-1314.
24. Vukasinovic N, Moll J, Kunzi N (1998) Genetic gain from QTL selection versus traditional selection methods. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Warsaw, Poland, 24-27 August 1998.
25. Wright S (1937) The distribution of gene frequencies in populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 23: 307-320.
26. Yi N, Xu S (2008) Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics 179(2): 1045-1055.