The use of unbalanced historical data for genomic selection in an international wheat breeding program

Field Crops Research

Volumn 154, Issue , 2013, Pages 12-22

  Dawson, Julie C ^a   Endelman, Jeffrey B ^a   Heslot, Nicolas ^a,b   Crossa, Jose ^d   Poland, Jesse ^c   Dreisigacker, Susanne ^d   Manès, Yann ^d,e   Sorrells, Mark E ^a   Jannink, Jean Luc ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Limagrain Europe ^*  (France)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^e Syngenta Seeds SAS   (France)

Author keywords

CIMMYT; FA; G E; G BLUP; Genomic selection; Genotype by environment interaction; GID; GL; GS; IN; ME; Mega environments; SAWYT; SP; Unbalanced data; Wheat breeding

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SEMIARID REGION; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84887819645     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes 2012, R Package Version 0. 999999-0.
2. Becker H.C., Leon J. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 1988, 101:1-23.
3. Beeck C., Cowling W., Smith A., Cullis B. Analysis of yield and oil from a series of canola breeding trials. Part I. fitting factor analytic mixed models with pedigree information. Genome 2010, 53:992-1001.
4. Bennett D., Reynolds M., Mullan D., Izanloo A., Kuchel H., Langridge P., Schnurbusch T. Detection of two major grain yield QTL in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under heat, drought and high yield potential environments. TAG Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 10.1007/s00122-012-1927-2.
5. Burgueño J., de los Campos G., Weigel K., Crossa J. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:1-13.
6. Butler D. ASReml: Asreml Fits the Linear Mixed Model 2009, R Package Version 3.0.
7. Byerlee D., Dubin H. Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration. Int. J. Commons 2009, 4:452-480.
8. Clark S.A., Hickey J.M., Daetwyler H.D., van der Werf J.H. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet. Selec. Evol. 2012, 44:1-9.
9. Dekkers J.C.M. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breeding Genet. 2007, 124:331-341.
10. Elshire R.J., Glaubitz J.C., Sun Q., Poland J.A., Kawamoto K., Buckler E.S., Mitchell S.E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (gbs) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 2011, 6:e19379.
11. Endelman J.B. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 2011, 4:250-255.
12. Endelman J.B., Jannink J.L. Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3: genes Genomes. Genetics (Bethesda) 2012, 2:1405-1413.
13. Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1963, 14:742-754.
14. Fraley C., Raftery A.E., Murphy T.B., Scrucca L. mclust Version 4 for R: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation 2012.
15. Gauch H.G. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 1988, 44:705-715.
16. Hartigan J. Clustering Algorithms 1975, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Heffner E.L., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:1-12.
18. Heslot N., Jannink J., Sorrells M.E. Using genomic prediction to characterize environments and optimize prediction accuracy in applied breeding data. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:921-933.
19. Johnson S.C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 1967, 32:241-254.
20. Lillemo M., Van Ginkel M., Trethowan R.M., Hernandez E., Rajaram S. Associations among international CIMMYT bread wheat yield testing locations in high rainfall areas and their implications for wheat breeding. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:1163-1169.
21. Lorenz A.J., Chao S., Asoro F.G., Heffner E.L., Hayashi T., Iwata H., Smith K.P., Sorrells M.E., Jannink J. Genomic selection in plant breeding: knowledge and prospects. Adv. Agron. 2011, 110:77-123.
22. Manès Y., Gomez H.F., Puhl L., Reynolds M., Braun H.J., Trethowan R. Genetic yield gains of the CIMMYT international semi-arid wheat yield trials from 1994 to 2010. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:1543-1552.
23. Meyer K. Factor-analytic models for genotype×environment type problems and structured covariance matrices. Genet. Selec. Evol. 2009, 41:1-11. 10.1186/1297-9686-41-21.
24. Piepho H.P. Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor-analytic variance-covariance structures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 97:195-201.
25. Piepho H.P., Mohring J. Best linear unbiased prediction of cultivar effects for subdivided target regions. Crop Sci. 2005, 45:1151-1159.
26. Poland J.A., Rife T.W. Genotyping-by-sequencing for plant breeding and genetics. Plant Genome 2012, 5:92-102.
27. Poland J., Endelman J., Dawson J., Rutkoski J., Wu S., Manes Y., Dreisigacker S., Crossa J., Sanchez-Villeda H., Sorrells M., Jannink J.-L. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome 2012, 5:103-113.
28. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
29. Rajaram S., van Ginkel M., Fischer R. CIMMYT's wheat breeding mega-environments (ME). Abstracts 8th International Wheat Genetics Symposium 1993.
30. SAS Institute Inc. SAS-STAT 9.3 Procedures Guide 2012, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
31. Singh R., Huerta-Espino J., Sharma R., Joshi A., Trethowan R. High yielding spring bread wheat germplasm for global irrigated and rainfed production systems. Euphytica 2007, 157:351-363. 10.1007/s10681-006-9346-6.
32. Smith A.B., Cullis B.R., Thompson R. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 143:449-462.
33. Trethowan R., Crossa J. Lessons learnt from forty years of international spring wheat bread wheat trials. Euphytica 2007, 157:385-390.
34. Trethowan R.M., van Ginkel J., Rajaram M., et al. Relationships among bread wheat international yield testing locations in dry areas. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:1461-1469.
35. Trethowan R.M., Rajaram M., et al. Progress in breeding wheat for yield and adaptation in global drought affected environments. Crop Sci. 2002, 42:1441-1446.
36. Trethowan R.M., van Ginkel M., Ammar K., Crossa J., Payne T.S., Cukadar B., Rajaram S., Hernandez E. Associations among twenty years of international bread wheat yield evaluation environments. Crop Sci. 2003, 43:1698-1711.
37. van Eeuwijk F., Cooper M., DeLacy I., Ceccarelli S., Grando S. Some vocabulary and grammar for the analysis of multi-environment trials, as applied to the analysis of FPB and PPB trials. Euphytica 2001, 122:477-490.
38. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
39. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58:236-244.
40. Windhausen V.S., Wagener S., Magorokosho C., Makumbi D., Vivek B., Piepho H.P., Melchinger A.E., Atlin G.N. Strategies to subdivide a target population of environments: results from the CIMMYT-led maize hybrid testing programs in Africa. Crop Sci. 2012, 52:2143-2152.