A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 595-607

  Jarquín, Diego ^a,b   Crossa, José ^c   Lacaze, Xavier ^d   Du Cheyron, Philippe ^f   Daucourt, Joëlle ^f   Lorgeou, Josiane ^g   Piraux, François ^g   Guerreiro, Laurent ^h   Pérez, Paulino ^a,e   Calus, Mario ⁱ   Burgueño, Juan ^c   de los Campos, Gustavo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^d Station Inter institut   (France)

^e Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^g ARVALIS Institut du Vegetal   (France)

^h ARVALIS Institut du Vegetal   (France)

ⁱ WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; CROPS; FORESTRY; GENES; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

COVARIANCE FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL DATA; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL INTERACTIONS; INTERACTION EFFECT; PREDICTION ACCURACY;

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; FRANCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; WHEAT;

BREEDING; FRANCE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC; TRITICUM;

EID: 84905591226     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2243-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alimi NA, Bink MCAM, Dieleman JA, Magán JJ, Wubs AM, Palloix A, van Eeuwijk FA (2013) Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper. Theor Appl Genet 126(10):2597–2625. doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2160-3
2. Bernardo RN (2010) Breeding for quantitative traits in plants, 2nd edn. Stemma Press, Woodbury
3. Boer MP, Wright D, Feng L et al (2007) A mixed-model quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for multiple-environment trial data using environmental covariables for QTL-by-environment interactions, with an example in maize. Genetics 177:1801–1813. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.071068
4. Burgueño J, Crossa J, Cornelius PL, Yang R-C (2008) Using factor analytic models for joining environments and genotypes without crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci 48:1291. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.11.0632
5. Burgueño J, Crossa J, Cotes JM et al (2011) Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multienvironment trials. Crop Sci 51:944. doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.07.0403
6. Burgueño J, de los Campos G, Weigel K, Crossa J (2012) Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci 52:707. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299
7. Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF (2003) Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model. J Dairy Sci 86:3756–3764
8. Calus MPL, Groen AF, De Jong G (2002) Genotype × environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J Dairy Sci 85:3115–3123
9. Cockerham CC (1954) An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39:859–882
10. Cornelius P, Crossa J, Seyedsadr M (1996) Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Gauch HG, Kang M (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Baco Raton, pp 199–234
11. Crossa J (2012) From genotype × environment interaction to gene × environment interaction. Curr Genomics 13:225–244. doi:10.2174/138920212800543066
12. Crossa J, Cornelius PL (1997) Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci 37:406–415. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020017x
13. Crossa J, Vargas M, van Eeuwijk FA et al (1999) Interpreting genotype × environment interaction in tropical maize using linked molecular markers and environmental covariables. Theor Appl Genet 99:611–625. doi:10.1007/s001220051276
14. Crossa J, Yang R-C, Cornelius PL (2004) Studying crossover genotype × environment interaction using linear-bilinear models and mixed models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 9:362–380. doi:10.2307/1400487
15. Crossa J, Burgueño J, Cornelius PL et al (2006) Modeling genotype × environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci 46:1722. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.11-0427
16. Crossa J, de los Campos G, Pérez P et al (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186:713–724. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.118521
17. Crossa J, Pérez P, de los Campos G et al (2011) Genomic selection and prediction in plant breeding. J Crop Improv 25:239–261. doi:10.1080/15427528.2011.558767
18. de los Campos G, Perez-Rodriguez P (2013) BGLR: Bayesian generalized linear regression. R package version. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/bglr/
19. de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D et al (2009) Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182:375–385. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.101501
20. de los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJM et al (2010) Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res 92:295–308. doi:10.1017/S0016672310000285
21. Denis JB (1988) Two way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19:123–132
22. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson Education Limited, England
23. Fisher RA, Mackenzie WA (1923) Studies in crop variation. II. The manurial response of different potato varieties. J Agric Sci 13:311–320. doi:10.1017/S0021859600003592
24. Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705–715. doi:10.2307/2531585
25. Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33:73–115. doi:10.1007/BF02289676
26. Gregorius H-R, Namkoong G (1986) Joint analysis of genotypic and environmental effects. Theor Appl Genet 12:413–422
27. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389–2397. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.081190
28. Heslot N, Yang H-P, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2012) Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci 52:146. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0297
29. Kempthorne O (1954) The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 143:102–113
30. Malosetti M, Voltas J, Romagosa I et al (2004) Mixed models including environmental covariables for studying QTL by environment interaction. Euphytica 137:139–145. doi:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040511.46388.ef
31. Malosetti M, Ribaut JM, Vargas M et al (2008) A multi-trait multi-environment QTL mixed model with an application to drought and nitrogen stress trials in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 161:241–257. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9594-0
32. Mandel J (1969) The partitioning of interaction in analysis of variance. J Res Natl Bureau Stand B Math Sci 73B:309–328
33. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
34. Paux E, Faure S, Choulet F et al (2010) Insertion site-based polymorphism markers open new perspectives for genome saturation and marker-assisted selection in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J 8:196–210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00477.x
35. Pérez P, de los Campos G, Crossa J, Gianola D (2010) Genomic-enabled prediction based on molecular markers and pedigree using the Bayesian linear regression package in R. Plant Genome 3:106–116. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2010.04.0005
36. Piepho H-P (1998) Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems. J Agron Crop Sci 180:193–213. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00526.x
37. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R (2001) Exploring variety-environment data using random effects AMMI models with adjustments for spatial field trend: part 1: theory, pp 323–335. doi: 10.1079/9780851996011.0323
38. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143:449–462. doi:10.1017/S0021859605005587
39. Su G, Madsen P, Lund MS, Sorensen D, Korsgaard IR Jensen J (2006) Bayesian analysis of the linear reaction norm model with unknown covariates. J Anim Sci 84 (7)(July):1651–1657. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-517
40. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
41. van Eeuwijk F, Kang M, Denis J (1996) Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. In: Gauch HG, Kang M (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 15–49
42. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414–4423. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980
43. Vargas M, Crossa J, Eeuwijk V et al (1999) Using partial least squares regression, factorial regression, and AMMI models for interpreting genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci 39:955–967. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040002x
44. Vargas M, Crossa J, van Eeuwijk F et al (2001) Interpreting treatment × environment interaction in agronomy trials. Agron J 93:949. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.934949x
45. Vargas M, van Eeuwijk FA, Crossa J, Ribaut J-M (2006) Mapping QTLs and QTL × environment interaction for CIMMYT maize drought stress program using factorial regression and partial least squares methods. Theor Appl Genet 112:1009–1023. doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0204-z
46. Woltereck R (1909) Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 19:110
47. Yates F, Cochran WG (1938) The analysis of groups of experiments. J Agric Sci 28:556–580. doi:10.1017/S0021859600050978