Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: Comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.)

Genetics

Volumn 192, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 715-728

  Rincent, R ^a,b,c,d   Laloe D ^e   Nicolas, S ^a   Altmann, T ^f,g   Brunel, D ^h   Revilla, P ⁱ   Rodriguez V M ⁱ   Moreno Gonzalez, J ^j   Melchinger, A ^k   Bauer, E ^l   Schoen, C C ^l   Meyer, N ^c   Giauffret, C ^m   Bauland, C ^a   Jamin, P ^a   Laborde, J ⁿ   Monod, H ^o   Flament, P ^d   Charcosset, A ^a   Moreau, L ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Genetics and Genomics in Cereals ^*  (France)

^c KWS SAAT SE   (Germany)

^d Limagrain site d'ULICE ^*  (France)

^e UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^f MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^g LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^h DIF   (France)

ⁱ MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

^j Centro de Investigacions Agrarias de Mabegondo   (Spain)

^k UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^l TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^m Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies   (France)

ⁿ INRA   (France)

^o UR341 National Agronomical Research Institute (INRA)   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; PREDICTION; PREDICTION ERROR VARIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, PLANT; INBREEDING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SELECTION, GENETIC; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84867244523     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.141473     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Albrecht, T., V. Wimmer, H.-J. Auinger, M. Erbe, C. Knaak et al., 2011 Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123: 339-350.
2. Amin, N., C. M. van Duijn, and Y. S. Aulchenko, 2007 A genomic background based method for association analysis in related individuals. PLoS ONE 2: e1274.
3. Astle, W., and D. J. Balding, 2009 Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat. Sci. 24: 451-471.
4. Atkinson, A. C., A. N. Donev, and R. D. Tobias, 2007 Optimum Experimental Designs, With SAS. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
5. Bernardo, R., and J. Yu, 2007 Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47: 1082.
6. Boichard, D., and M. Brochard, 2012 New phenotypes for new breeding goals in dairy cattle. Animal 6(544): 550.
7. Buckler, E. S., J. B. Holland, P. J. Bradbury, C. B. Acharya, P. J. Brown et al., 2009 The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325: 714-718.
8. Camus-Kulandaivelu, L., and J.-B. Veyrieras, D. Madur, V. Combes, M. Fourmann et al., 2006 Maize adaptation to temperate climate: relationship between population structure and polymorphism in the Dwarf8 gene. Genetics 172: 2449-2463.
9. Černý, V., 1985 Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 45: 41-51.
10. Chardon, F., B. Virlon, L. Moreau, M. Falque, J. Joets et al., 2004 Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome RID G-3710-2010. Genetics 168: 2169-2185.
11. Crossa, J., G. de los Campos, P. Perez, D. Gianola, J. Burgueno et al., 2010 Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186: 713-724.
12. Dekkers, J. C. M., 2007 Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 331-341.
13. Elshire, R. J., J. C. Glaubitz, Q. Sun, J. A. Poland, K. Kawamoto et al., 2011 A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (gbs) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6: e19379.
14. Fisher, R. A., 1918 The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. T. Roy. Soc. Edin. 52: 399-433.
15. Fruchterman, T. M. J., and E. M. Reingold, 1991 Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exper. 21: 1129-1164.
16. Ganal, M. W., G. Durstewitz, A. Polley, A. Bérard, E. S. Buckler et al., 2011 A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6: e28334.
17. Goddard, M., 2009 Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136: 245-257.
18. Goddard, M., B. Hayes, and T. Meuwissen, 2011 Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 128: 409-421.
19. Gore, M. A., J.-M. Chia, R. J. Elshire, Q. Sun, E. S. Ersoz et al., 2009 A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 326: 1115-1117.
20. Gower, J. C., 1966 Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325-338.
21. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers, 2007 The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
22. Hayes, B., P. Bowman, A. Chamberlain, and M. Goddard, 2009a Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 433-443.
23. Hayes, B. J., P. M. Visscher, and M. E. Goddard, 2009b Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 91: 47.
24. Hayes, B. J., P. J. Bowman, A. C. Chamberlain, K. Verbyla, and M. E. Goddard, 2009c Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41: 51.
25. Henderson, C. R., 1984 Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph Press, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
26. Huang, X., Q. Feng, Q. Qian, Q. Zhao, L. Wang et al., 2009 Highthroughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 19: 1068-1076.
27. Jannink, J. L., A. J. Lorenz, and H. Iwata, 2010 Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief. Funct. Genomics 9: 166-177.
28. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, 1983 Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220: 671.
29. Kuehn, L. A., D. R. Notter, G. J. Nieuwhof, and R. M. Lewis, 2007 Changes in connectedness over time in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 536-544.
30. Laloë, D., 1993 Precision and information in linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 25: 557-576.
31. Laloë, D., and F. Phocas, 2003 A proposal of criteria of robustness analysis in genetic evaluation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80: 241-256.
32. Laloë, D., F. Phocas, and F. Ménissier, 1996 Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 28: 1-20.
33. Leutenegger, A. L., B. Prum, E. Génin, C. Verny, A. Lemainque et al., 2003 Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient through use of genomic data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73: 516-523.
34. Maenhout, S., B. De Baets, and G. Haesaert, 2010 Graph-based data selection for the construction of genomic prediction models. Genetics 185: 1463-1475.
35. Metzker, M. L., 2009 Sequencing technologies: the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 31-46.
36. Meuwissen, T., B. Hayes, and M. Goddard, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819.
37. Mikel, M. A., 2006 Availability and analysis of proprietary dent corn inbred lines with expired US plant variety protection. Crop Sci. 46: 2555.
38. Nei, M., 1978 Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583.
39. Nelson, P. T., N. D. Coles, J. B. Holland, D. M. Bubeck, S. Smith et al., 2008 Molecular characterization of maize inbreds with expired U.S. plant variety protection. Crop Sci. 48: 1673.
40. Pszczola, M., T. Strabel, H. Mulder, and M. Calus, 2012 Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 389-400.
41. R development Core Team, 2006 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
42. Riedelsheimer, C., A. Czedik-Eysenberg, C. Grieder, J. Lisec, F. Technow et al., 2012 Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat. Genet. 44: 217-220.
43. Rozenfeld, A. F., S. Arnaud-Haond, E. Hernández-García, V. M. Eguíluz, E. A. Serrão et al., 2008 Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 18824.
44. SAS Institute, 2008 SAS/STATÒ 9.2 User's Guide. SAS, Cary, NC.
45. Thomas, M., E. Demeulenaere, J. Dawson, A.R. Khan, N. Galic et al., 2012 On-farm dynamic management of genetic diversity: the impact of seed diffusions and seed saving practices on a population variety of bread wheat. Evol. Appl. (in press).
46. VanRaden, P., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414-4423.
47. Whittaker, J. C., R. Thompson, and M. C. Denham, 2000 Markerassisted selection using ridge regression. Genet. Res. 75: 249-252.
48. Yang, J., B. Benyamin, B. P. McEvoy, S. Gordon, A. K. Henders et al., 2010 Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42: 565-569.
49. Zhao, Y., M. Gowda, W. Liu, T. Würschum, H. P. Maurer et al., 2012 Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124: 769-776.
50. Zhong, S., J. C. M. Dekkers, R. L. Fernando, and J.-L. Jannink, 2009 Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a barley case study. Genetics 182: 355-364.