Clarifying the learning experiences of healthcare professionals with in situ and off-site simulation-based medical education: A qualitative study

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Sørensen, Jette Led ^a   Navne, Laura Emdal ^b   Martin, Helle Max ^b   Ottesen, Bent ^a   Albrecthsen, Charlotte Krebs ^a   Pedersen, Berit Woetmann ^a   Kjærgaard, Hanne ^a   Van Der Vleuten, Cees ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Danish Analysis and Research Institute for Local Government   (Denmark)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; HEALTH AUXILIARY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IN SITU SIMULATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDWIFE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE; OBSTETRICIAN; OFF SITE SIMULATION; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SIMULATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENMARK; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84945579079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008345     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10-28.
2. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 2010;44:50-63.
3. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach 2013;35:e1511-30.
4. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, et al. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ 2014;48:375-85.
5. Merien AE, Van Der Ven J, Mol BW, et al. Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1021-31.
6. Riley W, Davis S, Miller KM, et al. Detecting breaches in defensive barriers using in situ simulation for obstetric emergencies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(Suppl 3):i53-6.
7. Walker ST, Sevdalis N, McKay A, et al. Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:453-8.
8. Rosen MA, Hunt EA, Pronovost PJ, et al. In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: a systematic review. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2012;32:243-54.
9. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:468-77.
10. Grierson LE. Information processing, specificity of practice, and the transfer of learning: considerations for reconsidering fidelity. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19:281-9.
11. Kneebone RL, Kidd J, Nestel D, et al. Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting. Med Educ 2005;39:580-7.
12. Teunissen PW, Wilkinson TJ. Learning and teaching in workplaces. In: Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, eds. Medical education: theory and practice. Edinburgh, London, New York, Oxford, Philadelphia, St Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2011:193-209.
13. Teteris E, Fraser K, Wright B, et al. Does training learners on simulators benefit real patients? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17:137-44.
14. Durning SJ, Artino AR Jr, Pangaro LN, et al. Perspective: redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research and training in medical education. Acad Med 2010;85:894-901.
15. Durning SJ, Artino AR. Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no. 52. Med Teach 2011;33:188-99.
16. Sørensen JL, Van Der Vleuten C, Rosthøj S, et al. Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008344.
17. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:128-33.
18. Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ 2009;339:b3496.
19. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299-302.
20. Stalmeijer RE, Mcnaughton N, Van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach 2014;36:923-39.
21. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a288.
22. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483-8.
23. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-57.
24. Fraenkal JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. Observation and interviewing. In: Fraenkal JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH, eds. How to design and evaluate research in education. 8th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012:444-76.
25. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, et al. There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 2006;1:49-55.
26. Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ 2012;46:636-47.
27. Sørensen JL, Lokkegaard E, Johansen M, et al. The implementation and evaluation of a mandatory multi-professional obstetric skills training program. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:1107-17.
28. Sørensen JL, Lottrup P, Vleuten Van Der C, et al. Unannounced in situ simulation of obstetric emergencies: staff perceptions and organisational impact. Postgrad Med J 2014;90:622-9.
29. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88.
30. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2003;24:105-12.
31. Fraenkal JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. Content analysis. In: Fraenkal JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH, eds. How to design and evaluate research in education. 8th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012:477-504.
32. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:795-805.
33. Koens F, Mann KV, Custers EJ, et al. Analysing the concept of context in medical education. Med Educ 2005;39:1243-9.
34. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Lemaster T, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary simulation-based training on patient safety in a paediatric emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:383-93.
35. Raemer DB. Ignaz semmelweis redux? Simul Healthc 2014;9:153-5.
36. Koens F, Ten Cate OT, Custers EJ. Context-dependent memory in a meaningful environment for medical education: in the classroom and at the bedside. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2003;8:155-65.
37. Godden DR, Baddeley AD. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol 1975;66:325-31.
38. Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: how low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(Suppl 1):i51-6.
39. Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, et al. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:303-9.
40. Volpe CE, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, et al. The impact of cross-training on team functioning: an empirical investigation. Hum Factors 1996;38:87-100.
41. Marks MA, Sabella MJ, Burke CS, et al. The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol 2002;87:3-13.
42. Gorman JC, Cooke NJ, Amazeen PG. Training adaptive teams. Hum Factors 2010;52:295-307.
43. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, et al. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med 2014;89:387-92.
44. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007;2:183-93.
45. Sharma S, Boet S, Kitto S, et al. Interprofessional simulated learning: the need for 'sociological fidelity'. J Interprof Care 2011;25:81-3.
46. Boet S, Bould MD, Layat BC, et al. Twelve tips for a successful interprofessional team-based high-fidelity simulation education session. Med Teach 2014;36:853-7.
47. Cook DA, West CP. Perspective: reconsidering the focus on "outcomes research" in medical education: a cautionary note. Acad Med 2013;88:162-7.