Student‐reported differences in technology use and skills after the implementation of one‐to‐one computing;Différences d’usages et de compétences technologiques rapportées par les élèves après la mise en place de programmes informatiques individualisés;Von schülern berichtete unterschiede in ihrer technikanwendung nach einführung von ,, One-to-One Computing“;Diferencias de uso y competencias en tecnologías relatas por los alumnos después de la introducción de la informática individualizada

Educational Media International

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 215-229

  Oliver, Kevin M ^a   Corn, Jeni O ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; One to one computing; Student centered learning; Ubiquitous computing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951594365     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980802284333     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anastos, E., and LaGace, D., 2007. Scaling 1:1 practices. Threshold, 5(1): 25–28.
2. Center for Research in Educational Policy. 2000a. School Observation Measure Retrieved August 31, 2005, from http://crep.memphis.edu/web/instruments/som.php
3. Center for Research in Educational Policy. 2000b. Survey of Computer Use Retrieved August 31, 2005, from http://crep.memphis.edu/web/instruments/scu.php
4. Creswell, J.W., and Clark, V.L.P., 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Dwyer, D.C., Ringstaff, C., and Haymore, J., 1990. The evolution of teachers' instructional beliefs and practices in high‐access‐to‐technology classrooms, Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc. (ACOT Report #8)
6. Iiyoshi, T., Hannafin, M.J., and Wang, F., 2005. Cognitive tools and student‐centered learning: Rethinking tools, functions, applications. Educational Media International, 42(4): 281–296.
7. Knezek, G., and Christensen, R., 2004. Student home access and the digital divide, Farmington, ME: Maine Center for Meaningful Engaged Learning. Research Brief MLLS 0402
8. Lehman, J., Park, S., Cramer, J., Grove, K., and Ertmer, P., 2003. “ Barriers to teachers' adoption and use of technology‐supported learner‐centered pedagogies ”. In Proceedings of SITE 2003, Edited by: Crawford, C., 1761–1766. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
9. Lewis, E.M., Ross, S.M., and Alberg, M., July 1999. School Observation Measure: Reliability analysis, July, Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy.
10. Linn, R., and Miller, M., 2005. Measurement and assessment in teaching, (9th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
11. Lowther, D.L., Ross, S.M., and Morrison, G.M., 2003. When each one has one. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3): 23–44.
12. Mabry, L., and Snow, J.Z., 2006. Laptops for high‐risk students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4): 289–316.
13. McHale, T., 2006a. One‐to‐one in Michigan. Technology & Learning, 27(3): 16–18.
14. McHale, T., 2006b. One‐to‐one in Ohio. Technology & Learning, 27(4): 30–32.
15. Miller, M., 1995. Coefficient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(3): 255–273.
16. Muir, M., Knezek, G., and Christensen, R., 2004a. The Maine Learning Technology Initiative, Farmington, ME: Center for Meaningful Engaged Learning. (Research Brief MLLS0401)
17. Muir, M., Knezek, G., and Christensen, R., 2004b. The power of one: Early findings from the Maine Learning Technology Initiative. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(3): 6–11.
18. Riley, S., 2007. Preparing teachers for one‐to‐one. School CIO, 27(8): 29
19. Rockman, S., 2007. It's my laptop. Threshold, 4(4): 21–25.
20. Rockman, S., June 1997. Report of a laptop program pilot June, Retrieved July 10, 2007, from the Microsoft Web site: http://www.microsoft.com/education/downloads/aal/resrch_1.rtf
21. Rockman, S., October 1998. Powerful tools for schooling October, Retrieved July 10, 2007, from the Microsoft Web site: http://www.microsoft.com/education/downloads/aal/research2.rtf
22. Rockman, S., n.d. A more complex picture Retrieved July 10, 2007, from the Microsoft Web site: http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/d/c/8dc3ebfe‐6849‐4534‐a4b7‐846a8c327874/Research3Report.doc
23. Ross, S.M., Lowther, D.L., and Morrison, G.R., 2001. Anytime, anywhere learning final evaluation report of the laptop program: Year 2, Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.nteq.com/Research/Laptop%20Yr2%20Final%2012‐10‐01.pdf
24. Russell, M., Bebell, D., and Higgins, J., 2004. Laptop learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4): 313–330.
25. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D.C., 1997. Teaching with technology: Creating student‐centered classrooms, New York: Columbia University Press.
26. University of South Carolina, Department of Educational Leadership and Policies. 1998. Evaluation report, year two, Schoolbook laptop project Retrieved July 9, 2007, from Beaufort County Schools: http://www.beaufort.k12.sc.us/district/ltopeval.html
27. Wurster, P., 2006–2007. Helpful hints for successful 1‐to‐1 computing. Learning & Leading with Technology, 34(4): 12–17.
28. Zucker, A.A., 2004. Developing a research agenda for ubiquitous computing in schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4): 371–386.