DNA methylation Landscape of body size variation in sheep

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Cao, Jiaxue ^a,b   Wei, Caihong ^a   Liu, Dongming ^c   Wang, Huihua ^a   Wu, Mingming ^a   Xie, Zhiyuan ^d   Capellini, Terence D ^e   Zhang, Li ^a   Zhao, Fuping ^a   Li, Li ^b   Zhong, Tao ^b   Wang, Linjie ^b   Lu, Jian ^f   Liu, Ruizao ^a   Zhang, Shifang ^a   Du, Yongfei ^d   Zhang, Hongping ^b   Du, Lixin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f National Center of Preservation and Utilization of Genetic Resources of Animal   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; BODY SIZE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CPG ISLAND; DNA METHYLATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; PROCEDURES; SHEEP;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CPG ISLANDS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; SHEEP;

EID: 84945208067     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep13950     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Berenos, C. et al. Heterogeneity of genetic architecture of body size traits in a free-living population. Molecular ecology 24, 1810-1830, doi: 10.1111/mec.13146 (2015).
2. Pryce, J. E., Hayes, B. J., Bolormaa, S. and Goddard, M. E. Polymorphic regions affecting human height also control stature in cattle. Genetics 187, 981-984, doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.123943 (2011).
3. Boyko, A. R. et al. A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biol 8, e1000451, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pbio.1000451 (2010).
4. Wolffe, A. P. and Guschin, D. Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription. J Struct Biol 129, 102-122, doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4217 (2000).
5. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes and development 16, 6-21, doi: 10.1101/gad.947102 (2002).
6. Sado, T. et al. X inactivation in the mouse embryo deficient for Dnmt1: distinct effect of hypomethylation on imprinted and random X inactivation. Developmental biology 225, 294-303, doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9823 (2000).
7. Portela, A. and Esteller, M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nature biotechnology 28, 1057-1068, doi: 10.1038/ nbt.1685 (2010).
8. Reik, W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 447, 425-432, doi: 10.1038/ nature05918 (2007).
9. Jones, P. A. and Takai, D. The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science 293, 1068-1070, doi: 10.1126/ science.1063852 (2001).
10. Jones, P. A. The DNA methylation paradox. Trends in genetics : TIG 15, 34-37 (1999).
11. Laurent, L. et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome research 20, 320-331, doi: 10.1101/ gr.101907.109 (2010).
12. Cao, J. X., Zhang, H. P. and Du, L. X. [Influence of environmental factors on DNA methylation]. Yi chuan = Hereditas/Zhongguo yi chuan xue hui bian ji 35, 839-846 (2013).
13. Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M. and Skinner, M. K. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308, 1466-1469, doi: 10.1126/science.1108190 (2005).
14. Waterland, R. A., Travisano, M., Tahiliani, K. G., Rached, M. T. and Mirza, S. Methyl donor supplementation prevents transgenerational amplification of obesity. International journal of obesity 32, 1373-1379, doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.100 (2008).
15. Lee, J. et al. Heritable imprinting defect caused by epigenetic abnormalities in mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Biology of reproduction 80, 518-527, doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.072330 (2009).
16. Feil, R. and Fraga, M. F. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13, 97-109, doi: 10.1038/nrg3142 (2011).
17. Bollati, V. and Baccarelli, A. Environmental epigenetics. Heredity (Edinb) 105, 105-112, doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.2 (2010).
18. Rosenfeld, C. S. Animal models to study environmental epigenetics. Biol Reprod 82, 473-488, doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.080952 (2010).
19. Feinberg, A. P. et al. Personalized epigenomic signatures that are stable over time and covary with body mass index. Sci Transl Med 2, 49ra67, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001262 (2010).
20. Relton, C. L. et al. DNA methylation patterns in cord blood DNA and body size in childhood. PLoS One 7, e31821, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0031821 (2012).
21. Dick, K. J. et al. DNA methylation and body-mass index: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 383, 1990-1998, doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(13)62674-4 (2014).
22. Zhang, L. et al. Genome-wide association studies for growth and meat production traits in sheep. PLoS One 8, e66569, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066569 (2013).
23. Jiang, Y. et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science 344, 1168-1173, doi: 10.1126/ science.1252806 (2014).
24. Koga, Y. et al. Genome-wide screen of promoter methylation identifies novel markers in melanoma. Genome research 19, 1462-1470, doi: 10.1101/gr.091447.109 (2009).
25. Sati, S. et al. High resolution methylome map of rat indicates role of intragenic DNA methylation in identification of coding region. PloS one 7, e31621, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031621 (2012).
26. Feng, S. et al. Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 8689-8694, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002720107 (2010).
27. Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13, 484-492, doi: 10.1038/ nrg3230 (2012).
28. Resources, C. N. C. o. A. G. Animal Genetic Resources in China: Sheep and Goats. Vol. 1 (Chinese Agricultural Press, 2012).
29. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. and Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature protocols 4, 44-57, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 (2009).
30. Morand, S., De Bellocq, J. G., Stanko, M. and Miklisova, D. Is sex-biased ectoparasitism related to sexual size dimorphism in small mammals of Central Europe? Parasitology 129, 505-510 (2004).
31. Hernando-Herraez, I. et al. Dynamics of DNA methylation in recent human and great ape evolution. PLoS Genet 9, e1003763, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003763 (2013).
32. Steinert, S., Shay, J. W. and Wright, W. E. Modification of subtelomeric DNA. Mol Cell Biol 24, 4571-4580 (2004).
33. Gonzalo, S. et al. DNA methyltransferases control telomere length and telomere recombination in mammalian cells. Nature cell biology 8, 416-424, doi: 10.1038/ncb1386 (2006).
34. Zhao, M. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein receptor signaling is necessary for normal murine postnatal bone formation. J Cell Biol 157, 1049-1060, doi: 10.1083/jcb.200109012 (2002).
35. Liu, Z. et al. Molecules mimicking Smad1 interacting with Hox stimulate bone formation. J Biol Chem 279, 11313-11319, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312731200 (2004).
36. Ebisawa, T. et al. Smurf1 interacts with transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor through Smad7 and induces receptor degradation. J Biol Chem 276, 12477-12480, doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100008200 (2001).
37. Cho, H., Thorvaldsen, J. L., Chu, Q., Feng, F. and Birnbaum, M. J. Akt1/PKBalpha is required for normal growth but dispensable for maintenance of glucose homeostasis in mice. J Biol Chem 276, 38349-38352, doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100462200 (2001).
38. Bohni, R. et al. Autonomous control of cell and organ size by CHICO, a Drosophila homolog of vertebrate IRS1-4. Cell 97, 865-875, doi: S0092-8674(00)80799-0 [pii] (1999).
39. Leevers, S. J., Weinkove, D., MacDougall, L. K., Hafen, E. and Waterfield, M. D. The Drosophila phosphoinositide 3-kinase Dp110 promotes cell growth. EMBO J 15, 6584-6594 (1996).
40. Kim, E., Goraksha-Hicks, P., Li, L., Neufeld, T. P. and Guan, K. L. Regulation of TORC1 by Rag GTPases in nutrient response. Nature cell biology 10, 935-945, doi: 10.1038/ncb1753 (2008).
41. Yoshida, S. et al. Redox regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity by modulating the TSC1/TSC2- Rheb GTPase pathway. J Biol Chem 286, 32651-32660, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.238014 (2011).
42. ZHANG, X.-n. et al. Developmental Expression Patterns of AKT Gene in Fetal Longissimus Dorsi Muscle between Texel and Ujumqin Sheep during the Second Half of Gestation. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine 8, 005 (2012).
43. Sun, L. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway stabilizes DNA methyltransferase I protein and maintains DNA methylation. Cell Signal 19, 2255-2263, doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.06.014 (2007).
44. Esteve, P. O. et al. A methylation and phosphorylation switch between an adjacent lysine and serine determines human DNMT1 stability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18, 42-48, doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1939 (2011).
45. Lin, H. J. et al. Breast cancer-associated fibroblasts confer AKT1-mediated epigenetic silencing of Cystatin M in epithelial cells. Cancer Res 68, 10257-10266, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0288 (2008).
46. Kong, K. A., Lee, J. Y., Oh, J. H., Lee, Y. and Kim, M. H. Akt1 mediates the posterior Hoxc gene expression through epigenetic modifications in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839, 793-799, doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.06.011 (2014).
47. Kong, K. A., Yoon, H. and Kim, M. H. Akt1 as a putative regulator of Hox genes. Gene 513, 287-291, doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.034 (2013).
48. Matsui, T., Nagoshi, T. and Rosenzweig, A. Akt and PI 3-kinase signaling in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and survival. Cell Cycle 2, 220-223 (2003).
49. Vivanco, I. and Sawyers, C. L. The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 489-501, doi: 10.1038/nrc839 (2002).
50. Ito, N. and Rubin, G. M. gigas, a Drosophila homolog of tuberous sclerosis gene product-2, regulates the cell cycle. Cell 96, 529-539 (1999).
51. Potter, C. J., Huang, H. and Xu, T. Drosophila Tsc1 functions with Tsc2 to antagonize insulin signaling in regulating cell growth, cell proliferation, and organ size. Cell 105, 357-368 (2001).
52. Gao, X. and Pan, D. TSC1 and TSC2 tumor suppressors antagonize insulin signaling in cell growth. Genes and development 15, 1383-1392, doi: 10.1101/gad.901101 (2001).
53. Kobayashi, T. et al. A germ-line Tsc1 mutation causes tumor development and embryonic lethality that are similar, but not identical to, those caused by Tsc2 mutation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 8762-8767, doi: 10.1073/pnas.151033798 (2001).
54. Kwiatkowski, D. J. et al. A mouse model of TSC1 reveals sex-dependent lethality from liver hemangiomas, and up-regulation of p70S6 kinase activity in Tsc1 null cells. Human molecular genetics 11, 525-534 (2002).
55. Uhlmann, E. J. et al. Loss of tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (Tsc1) expression results in increased Rheb/S6K pathway signaling important for astrocyte cell size regulation. Glia 47, 180-188, doi: 10.1002/glia.20036 (2004).
56. Ehrich, M. et al. Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15785-15790, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507816102 (2005).
57. Hellemans, J., Mortier, G., De Paepe, A., Speleman, F. and Vandesompele, J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome biology 8, R19, doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8- 2-r19 (2007).