Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics

Profesional de la Informacion

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 607-620

  Thelwall, Mike ^a   Kousha, Kayvan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alternative indicators; Alternative metrics; Altmetrics; Citation analysis; Mendeley; Scientometrics; Social media metrics; Twitter; Web indicators; Webometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945201109     PISSN: 13866710     EISSN: 16992407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2015.sep.09     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Adie, Euan; Roe, William (2013). "Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics". Learned publishing, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 11-17. http://figshare.com/articles/Enriching-scholarly-content-with-article-level-discussion-and-metrics/105851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130103
2. Alhoori, Hamed; Furuta, Richard (2014). "Do altmetrics follow the crowd or does the crowd follow altmetrics?" In: Procs of the IEEE/ACM Joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL 2014). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. htt p: //p e o p l e.ta m u. e d u /~ a l h o o r i /p u b l i c a t i o n s /alhoori2014jcdl.pdf
3. ARC (2015). Excellence in Research for Australia. http://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia
4. Araújo, Ronaldo F.; Murakami, Tiago R. M.; De Lara, Juan L.; Fausto, Sibele (2015). "Does the Global South have altmetrics? Analyzing a Brazilian LIS journal". In: Proceedings of ISSI 2015-15th Intl conf of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey: Boʇaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 111-112.
5. Bar-Ilan, Judit (2012). "JASIST@Mendeley". In: Altmetrics12 workshop of the ACM Web science conference. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics12/bar-ilan
6. Bar-Ilan, Judit (2014). "Astrophysics publications on arXiv, Scopus and Mendeley: A case study". Scientometrics, v. 100, n. 1, pp. 217-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1215-1
7. Bar-Ilan, Judit; Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Priem, Jason; Shema, Hadas; Terliesner, Jens (2012): "Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web". 17th Intl conf on science and technology indicators, Montréal, Canada, pp. 98-109. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611
8. Bence, Valerie; Oppenheim, Charles (2004). "The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise". Journal of information science, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 347-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551504045854
9. Birkholz, Julie M.; Wang, Shenghui (2011). "Who are we talking about?: The validity of online metrics for commenting on science". In: Altmetrics11: Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web. An ACM Web Science Conference 2011 Workshop, Koblenz, Germany, pp. 14-15. http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/birkholz-v0
10. Bogers, Toine; Van Den Bosch, Antal (2008). "Recommending scientific articles using CiteULike". In: Procs of the 2008 ACM conf on recommender systems (RecSys '08), pp. 287-290. New York, NY: ACM. http://ilk.uvt.nl/~toine/publications/bogers.2008. recsys2008-paper.pdf
11. Bollen, Johan; Van-De-Sompel, Herbert; Smith, Joan A.; Luce, Richard (2005). "Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data". Information processing & management, v. 41, n. 6, pp. 1419-1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
12. Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin (2015). "Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley". Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 477-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.001
13. Bornmann, Lutz; Leydesdorff, Loet (2013). "The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000". Journal of informetrics, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 286-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003
14. Bornmann, Lutz (2014). "Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics". Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
15. Borrego, Ángel; Fry, Jenny (2012). "Measuring researchers' use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy". Journal of information science, v. 38, n. 3, pp. 297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551512438353
16. Chakraborty, Nirmali (2012). "Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU: A study on Facebook and ResearchGate". Planner-2012, pp. 19-27. http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/1944/1666/1/3.pdf
17. Colledge, Lisa (2014). Snowball metrics recipe book. http://www.snowballmetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/snowball-recipe-book-HR.pdf
18. Colquhoun, David; Plested, Andrew (2014). "Why you should ignore altmetrics and other bibliometric nightmares". http://www.dcscience.net/2014/01/16/why-you-shouldignore-altmetrics-and-other-bibliometric-nightmares
19. Costas, Rodrigo; Zahedi, Zohreh; Wouters, Paul (2014). "Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 2003-2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309 arXiv preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4321
20. Cronin, Blaise; Weaver-Wozniak, Sherrill (1995). "The praxis of acknowledgement: From bibliometrics to influmetrics". Revista española de documentación científica, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 172-177.
21. Crotty, David (2012). "Life after publication-post-publication peer review". Biochemist, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 26-28. http://www.biochemist.org/bio/03404/0026/034040026.pdf
22. Teixeira-Da-Silva, Jaime A. (2013). "The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing". Frontiers in plant science, 4 December. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00485
23. Darmoni, Stefan J.; Roussel, Francis; Benichou, Jacques; Faure, Gilbert C.; Thirion, Benoit; Pinhas, Nicole (2000). "Reading factor as a credible alternative to impact factor: A preliminary study". Technology and health care, v. 8, n. 3-4, pp. 174-175.
24. Desai, Tejas; Shariff, Afreen; Shariff, Aabid; Kats, Mark; Fang, Xiangming; Christiano, Cynthia; Ferris, Maria (2012). "Tweeting the meeting: An in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at Kidney week 2011". PLoS one, v. 7, n. 7, e40253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040253
25. Dinsmore, Adam; Allen, Liz; Dolby, Kevin (2014). "Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact". PLoS biology, v. 12, n. 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002003
26. Donovan, Claire; Butler, Linda (2007). "Testing novel quantitative indicators of research "quality," esteem and "user engagement:" An economics pilot study". Research evaluation, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820207X257030
27. Eyre-Walker, Adam; Stoletzki, Nina (2013). "The assessment of science: The relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations". PLoS biology, v. 11, n. 10, e1001675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675
28. Eysenbach, Gunther (2011). "Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact". Journal of medical internet research, v. 13, n. 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012
29. Fenner, Martin (2013). "What can article-level metrics do for you?" PLoS biology, v. 11, n. 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001687
30. Franceschet, Massimo; Costantini, Antonio (2011). "The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective". Journal of informetrics, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 275-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.12.002
31. Hammarfelt, Björn (2014). "Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1419-1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3
32. Haunschild, Robin; Stefaner, Moritz; Bornmann, Lutz (2015). "Who publishes, reads, and cites papers? An analysis of country information". In: Procs of ISSI 2015-15th Intl conf of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey: Boʇaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 4-15.
33. Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timothy D.; Holmberg, Kim; Peters, Isabella; Larivière, Vincent (2014). "Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behaviour". Aslib Journal of information management, v. 66, n. 3, pp. 279-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0081
34. Haustein, Stefanie; Costas, Rodrigo; Larivière, Vincent (2015). "Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns". PloS one, v. 10, n. 3, e0120495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
35. Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Thelwall, Mike; Amyot, Didier; Peters, Isabella (2014). "Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?". ITInformation technology, v. 56, n. 5, pp. 207-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/itit-2014-1048
36. Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Thelwall, Mike; Larivière, Vincent (2014). "Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 4, pp. 656-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101
37. Haustein, Stefanie; Siebenlist, Tobias (2011). "Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage". Journal of informetrics, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 446-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002
38. Hawkins, C. Matthew; Duszak, Richard; Rawson, James V. (2014). "Social media in radiology: Early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting". Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR), v. 11, n. 4, pp. 387-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.07.015
39. Hefce (2015). The metric tide: Correlation analysis of REF2014 scores and metrics. Supplementary Report II to the Independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Hefce. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3362.4162
40. Henning, Victor; Reichelt, Jan (2008). "Mendeley - A Last. fm for research?" IEEE fourth intl conf on eScience (eScience '08), pp. 327-328. Los Alamitos: IEEE.
41. Holmberg, Kim; Thelwall, Mike (2014). "Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1027-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3
42. Hull, Duncan; Pettifer, Steve R.; Kell, Douglas B. (2008). "Defrosting the digital library: Bibliographic tools for the next generation web". PLoS computational biology, v. 4, n. 10, e1000204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204
43. Hunter, Jane (2012). "Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation". Frontiers in computational neuroscience (30 August). http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3431010
44. Jeng, Wei; He, Daqing; Jiang, Jiepu (2015). "User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 5, pp. 890-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23225
45. Jobmann, Alexandra; Hoffmann, Christian P.; Künne, Sylvia; Peters, Isabella; Schmitz, Jasmin; Wollnik-Korn, Gabriele (2014). "Altmetrics for large, multidisciplinary research groups: Comparison of current tools". Bibliometrie-praxis und forschung, 3. http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/205/258
46. Kadriu, Arbana (2013). "Discovering value in academic social networks: A case study in ResearchGate". In: Procs of the Intl conf on information technology interfaces, 35th ITI, pp. 57-62. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6648997
47. Konkiel, Stacey (2013). "Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: Challenges and opportunities". Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 39, n. 6, pp. 27-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390610
48. Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (in press). "Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23404
49. Kurtz, Michael J.; Eichhorn, Guenther; Accomazzi, Alberto; Grant, Carolyn S.; Murray, Stephen S.; Watson, Joyce M. (2000). "The NASA astrophysics data system: Overview". Astronomy and astrophysics supplement series, v. 143, n. 1, pp. 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/aas:2000170
50. Kurtz, Michael J.; Eichhorn, Guenther; Accomazzi, Alberto; Grant, Carolyn; Demleitner, Markus; Murray, Stephen S.; Martimbeau, Natalie; Elwell, Barbara (2005). "The bibliometric properties of article readership information". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 56, n. 2, pp. 111-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20096
51. Letierce, Julie; Passant, Alexandre; Breslin, John G.; Decker, Stefan (2010). "Using Twitter during an academic conference: The #iswc2009 use-case". In: ICWSM 2010-Procs of the 4th Intl AAAI conf on weblogs and social media, pp. 279-282. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1523/1877
52. Letierce, Julie; Passant, Alexandre; Decker, Stefan; Breslin, John G. (2010). "Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages". In: Procs of the Web science conference, Raleigh, NC, USA. http://journal.webscience.org/314/2/websci10-submission-79.pdf
53. Li, Xuemei; Thelwall, Mike (2012). "F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators". In: Procs of the 17th Intl conf on science and technology indicators, Montréal, Canada, pp. 451-551. http://2012.sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol2/Li-F1000-541.pdf
54. Li, Xuemei; Thelwall, Mike; Giustini, Dean (2012). "Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement". Scientometrics, v. 91, n. 2, pp. 461-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x
55. Maflahi, Nabeil; Thelwall, Mike (in press). "When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23369
56. Mas-Bleda, Amalia; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan; Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). "Do highly cited researchers successfully use the Social Web?". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0
57. McKendrick, Douglas R. A.; Cumming, Grant P.; Lee, Amanda J. (2012). "Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: A report and a review of the educational opportunities". Journal of medical internet research, v. 14, n. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2144 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232765
58. Mohammadi, Ehsan (2014). Identifying the invisible impact of scholarly publications: a multi-disciplinary analysis using altmetrics (PhD Thesis). University of Wolverhampton, UK.
59. Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike (2013). "Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels". Scientometrics, v. 97, n. 2, pp. 383-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0993-9
60. Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike (2014). "Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 8, pp. 1627-1638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071
61. Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent (2015). "Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66 n. 9, pp. 1832-1846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23286
62. Mohammadi, Ehsan; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (in press). "Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23477
63. Neill, Andrew; Cronin, John J.; Brannigan, Domhnall; O'Sullivan, Ronan; Cadogan, Mike (2014). "The impact of social media on a major international emergency medicine conference". Emergency medicine journal, v. 31, n. 5, pp. 401-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202039 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23423992
64. Neylon, Cameron; Wu, Shirley (2009). "Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact". PLoS biology, v. 7, n. 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242
65. Paul-Hus, Adèle; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent (2015). "Is there a gender gap in social media metrics?" In: Procs of ISSI 2015-15th Intl conf of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey: Boʇaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 37-45.
66. Priem, Jason; Costello, Kaitlin-Light (2010). "How and why scholars cite on Twitter". In: Procs of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, pp. 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701201
67. Priem, Jason; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2010). "Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web". First Monday, v. 15, n. 7. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
68. Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. http://arXiv.org/html/1203.4745v1
69. Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
70. Rasmussen, Pernille G.; Andersen, Jens-Peter (2013). "Altmetrics: An alternate perspective on research evaluation". Sciecom info, v. 9, n. 2. http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/sciecominfo/article/view/7292/6102
71. REF (2012). Panel criteria and working methods. h t t p: //w w w. r e f. a c. u k /m e d i a /r e f /c o n t e n t /p u b /panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01-12.doc
72. Ritterbush, Jon (2007). "Supporting library research with LibX and Zotero: Two open source Firefox extensions". Journal of web librarianship, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J502v01n03-08
73. Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). "New data, new possibilities: exploring the insides of Altmetric.com". El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 359-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03
74. Ross, Claire B.; Terras, Melissa; Warwick, Claire L.; Welsh, Anne (2011). "Enabled backchannel: Conference Twitter use by digital humanists". Journal of documentation, v. 67, n. 2, pp. 214-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411111109449
75. Rousseau, Ronald; Fred, Y. Ye (2013). "A multi-metric approach for research evaluation". Chinese science bulletin, v. 58, n. 26, pp. 3288-3290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5939-3
76. Shuai, Xin; Pepe, Alberto; Bollen, Johan (2012). "How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations". PLoS one, v. 7, n. 11, e47523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047523
77. Stachowiak, Beata (2014). "The presence of Polish academics on social networking websites for academics, using the example of employees of Nicolaus Copernicus University". Universal journal of educational research v. 2, n. 1, pp. 64-68. http://www.hrpub.org/download/20131215/UJER7-19501102. pdf On Beall's list of predatory open access publishers: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers
78. Steen, R. Grant (2011). "Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?". Journal of medical ethics, v. 37, n. 2, pp. 113-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.042044
79. Sud, Pardeep; Thelwall, Mike (2014b). "Evaluating altmetrics". Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 2, pp. 1131-1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2
80. Taraborelli, Dario (2008). "Soft peer review: Social software and distributed scientific evaluation". In: Procgs of the Eighth Intl conf on the design of cooperative systems, Carry-Le-Rouet. http://nitens.org/docs/spr-coop08.pdf
81. Thelwall, Mike (in press). "Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?". Journal of librarianship & information science. h t t p: //w w w. s c i t. w l v. a c. u k /~ c m 1 9 9 3 /p a p e r s /MendeleyOutliersPreprint.pdf
82. Thelwall, Mike; Fairclough, Ruth (2015). "The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores". Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 529-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.006
83. Thelwall, Mike; Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2013). "Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates". PLoS one, v. 8, n. 5, e64841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
84. Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2014a). "Academia.edu: Social network or academic network?". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 4, pp. 721-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038
85. Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2014b). "ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship?". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236
86. Thelwall, Mike; Maflahi, Nabeil (2015). "Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 6, pp. 1124-1135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23252
87. Thelwall, Mike; Sud, Pardeep (in press). "Mendeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23559
88. Thelwall, Mike; Tsou, Andrew; Weingart, Scott; Holmberg, Kim; Haustein, Stefanie (2013) "Tweeting links to academic articles". Cybermetrics, v. 17, n. 1. http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v17i1p1.html
89. Thelwall, Mike; Wilson, Paul (in press). "Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23501
90. Tsou, Andrew; Bowman, Tim; Ghazinejad, Ali; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2015). "Who tweets about science?". In: Procs of ISSI 2015-15th Intl conf of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey: Boʇaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 95-100.
91. Waltman, Ludo; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). "F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 3, pp. 433-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23040
92. Wang, Xianwen; Wang, Zhi; Xu, Shenmeng (2013). "Tracing scientist's research trends realtimely". Scientometrics, v. 95, n. 2, pp. 717-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0884-5
93. Wardle, David A. (2010). "Do Faculty of 1000 (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?". Ideas in ecology and evolution, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 11-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4033/iee.2010.3.3.c http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/IEE/article/viewFile/2379/2479
94. Wei, Chih-Ping; Chen, Yen-Ming; Yang, Chin-Sheng; Yang, Christopher C. (2010). "Understanding what concerns consumers: A semantic approach to product feature extraction from consumer reviews". Information systems and e-business management, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 149-167.
95. Weller, Katrin; Dröge, Evelyn; Puschmann, Cornelius (2011). "Citation analysis in Twitter. Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences". In M. Rowe et al. (eds.), Procs of making sense of microposts (#MSM2011). CEUR Workshop Procs., pp.1-12, Heraklion, Greece. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-718/paper-04.pdf
96. Wen, Xidao; Lin, Yu-Ru; Trattner, Christoph; Parra, Denis (2014). "Twitter in academic conferences: Usage, networking and participation over time". In: Procs of the 25th ACM Conf on hypertext and social media, pp. 285-290. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2631775&picked=prox http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1210
97. Wilsdon, James et al. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
98. Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control - tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Netherlands. SURF Foundation. http://www.surf.nl/binaries/content/assets/surf/en/knowledgebase/2011/Users+narcissism+and+control.pdf
99. Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo; Wouters, Paul (2014). "How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1491-1513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0
100. Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo; Wouters, Paul (2015). "Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)?" In: Procs of ISSI 2015-15th Intl conf of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Istanbul, Turkey: Boʇaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 16-25.
101. Zahedi, Zohreh; Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timothy D. (2014). "Exploring data quality and retrieval strategies for Mendeley reader counts". Sigmet Metrics 2014 workshop, 5 November 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/StefanieHaustein/sigmetworkshop-asist2014