How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Shuai, Xin ^a   Pepe, Alberto ^b   Bollen, Johan ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; ONLINE ANALYSIS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSER;

ALGORITHMS; BIBLIOMETRICS; BLOGGING; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PUBLISHING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84868318337     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047523     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Rubin R (2010) Foundations of library and information science 3rd edition. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
2. Letierce J, Passant A, Decker S, Breslin JG (2010) Understanding how twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Web Science Conf. 2010. Raleigh, NC.
3. Weller K, Dröge E, Puschmann C (2011) Citation analysis in twitter: Approaches for defining and measuring information ows within tweets during scientific conferences. In: Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011). 1-12. Available: http://research.hypios.com/msm2011/. Accessed 2012 Oct 18.
4. Priem J, Costello KL (2010) How and why scholars cite on twitter. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 47, 1-4. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701201.
5. Weller K, Puschmann C (2011) Twitter for scientific communication: How can citations/references be identified and measured? In: Web Science Conf. 2011. Germany. Available: http://journal.webscience.org/500/1/153_paper.pdf. Accessed 2012 Oct 18.
6. Eysenbach G, (2011) Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13: e123.
7. Priem J, Hemminger BH (2010) Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday 15.
8. Priem J, Piwowar HA, Hemminger BH (2011) Altmetrics in the wild: An exploratory study of impact metrics based on social media. In: Metrics 2011: Symposium on Informetric and Scientometric Research. New Orleans, LA. Available: http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/PLoS-altmetrics-sigmetrics11-abstract.pdf. Accessed 2012 Oct 18.
9. Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Bettencourt L, Chute R, et al. (2009) Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. Plos One 4.
10. Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Rodriguez MA (2008) Towards usage-based impact metrics: first results from the MESUR project. In: JCDL 2008. Pittsburgh, PA. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3791. Accessed 2012)ct 18.
11. Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L, (2006) Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57: 1060-1072.
12. Kurtz M, Bollen J (2010) Usage Bibliometrics, volume 44. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. 3-64.