Tracing scientist's research trends realtimely

Scientometrics

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 717-729

  Wang, Xianwen ^a   Wang, Zhi ^a   Xu, Shenmeng ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Altmetrics; Download; Realtime; Research trend; Scientometrics; Springer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876083920     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0884-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arrue, J. L., & Lopez, M. V. (1991). Conservation tillage research trends and priorities. Suelo Y Planta, 1, 555-564.
2. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age information, infrastructure and the internet. London: MIT Press.
3. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Grupp, H. (1995). The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993. Part I. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 33, 263-293.
4. Braun, T., Schubert, A. P., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Growth and trends of fullerene research as reflected in its journal literature. Chem Rev, 100, 23-38.
5. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 57, 1060-1072.
6. Cole, S. (1989). Citation and the evaluation of individual scientiste. Trends Biochem Sci, 14, 9-13.
7. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Inf Process Manage, 37, 817-842.
8. Ebner, M., & Reinhardt, W. (2009). Social networking in scientific conferences-twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science (pp. 1-8).
9. Greenhow, C. (2009). Social scholarship: applying social networking technologies to research practices. Am Lib Assoc, 37, 42-47.
10. Groth, P., & Gurney, T. (2010). Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: a chemistry blogging case study. In: Web Science Conf., 2010, Raleigh, NC.
11. Jahandideh, S., & Abdolmaleki, P. (2007). Prediction of future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads. Med Hypotheses, 69, 458-459.
12. Keiser, J., & Utzinger, J. (2005). Trends in the core literature on tropical medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1952-2002. Scientometrics, 62, 351-365.
13. Kirkup, G. (2010). Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity. Lond Rev Educ, 8, 75-84.
14. Kjellberg, S. (2011). I am a blogging researcher: motivations for blogging in a scholarly context. Retrieved December 21, 2011 from http://frodo. lib. uic. edu/ojsjournals/index. php/fm/article/view/2962/2580.
15. Koblenz. (2011). Tracking scholarly impact on the social Web. Retrieved December 21, 2011 from http://altmetrics. org/workshop2011/.
16. Kurtz, M. J., & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage bibliometrics. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol, 44, 1-64.
17. Letierce, J., Passant, A., Decker, S., & Breslin, J. G. (2010). Understanding how twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Web Science Conf., 2010, Raleigh, NC.
18. Li, L. L., Ding, G. H., Feng, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2009). Global stem cell research trend: bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 39-58.
19. Lovink, G. (2008). Zero comments. Blogging and Critical Internet Culture. London: Routledge.
20. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2010). Problems of citation analysis: a study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 61, 1-13.
21. Moed, H. F. (2005). Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 56, 1088-1097.
22. Neylon, C., & Wu, S. (2009). Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biol, 7, e1000242.
23. O'Leary, D. E. (2008). The relationship between citations and number of downloads in decision support systems. Decis Support Syst, 45, 972-980.
24. Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 47, 1-4.
25. Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. (2010). Scientometrics 2. 0: new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15.
26. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010), Alt-metrics: A manifesto, (v. 1. 0). Retrieved April 21, 2012 from http://altmetrics. org/manifesto.
27. Qin, J. (2000). Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database: an investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci, 51, 166-180.
28. Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & BollenHow, J. (2012). How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations. CoRR abs/1202. 2461.
29. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Comput Educ, 58, 766-774.
30. Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., Peng, L., Wang, Z., Wang, C. L., Zhang, C. B., et al. (2012). Exploring scientists' working timetable: do scientists often work overtime? J Informetr, 6, 655-660.
31. Weller, K., Dröge, E., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation analysis in twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information ows within tweets during scientific conferences. In: Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011), pp. 1-12.
32. Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In: Web Science Conf., 2011, Germany.
33. Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77, 113-130.
34. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30, 333-351.