Who publishes, reads, and cites papers? An analysis of country information

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 4-15

  Haunschild, Robin ^a   Stefaner, Moritz ^b   Bornmann, Lutz ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b Eickedorfer Damm 35   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW SYSTEM; QUALITY LEVELS; RESEARCH FIELDS; RESEARCH GROUPS; SCIENTOMETRICS; WEB OF SCIENCE; WELL BALANCED;

PAPER;

EID: 84945226206     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bar-Ilan, J., Shema, H. & Thelwall M. (2014). Bibliographic References in Web 2.0. In B. Cronin and C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multi-dimensional indicators of performance (pp. 307-325). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
2. Bonasio, A. (2014). A look at Mendeley Readership Statistics. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://blog.mendeley.com/academic-features/a-look-at-mendeley-readership-statistics/.
3. Bornmann, L. (2014). Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 935-950.
4. Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123-1144
5. Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
6. Bornmann, L. & Haunschild, R. (2015). Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley, Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 477-487
7. F1000. 2012 What is F1000? Retrieved October 25 http://f1000.com/about/whatis
8. Galloway, L. M., Pease, J. L. & Rauh, A. E. (2013). Introduction to altmetrics for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) librarians. Science & Technology Libraries, 32(4), 335-345.
9. Haustein, S. (2014). Readership metrics. In B. Cronin and C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multi-dimensional indicators of performance (pp. 327-344). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
10. Haustein, S. & Larivièe, V. (2014). A multidimensional analysis of Aslib Proceedings-using everything but the impact factor. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 358-380.
11. Haustein, S. & Peters, I. (2012). Using social bookmarks and tags as alternative indicators of journal content description. Firstmonday, 17(11).
12. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H. & Terliesner, H. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 1-19.
13. Kreiman, G. & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2011). Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5.
14. Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2012). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461-471.
15. Mohammadi, E. & Thelwall, M. (2013). Assessing the Mendeley readership of social science and humanities research. Proceedings of ISSI 2013 Vienna: 14th International society of scientometrics and informetrics conference. J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger & M. Ho. Vienna, Austria, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH: 200-214.
16. Mohammadi, E. & Thelwall, M., (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627-1638.
17. Neylon, C., Willmers, M. & King, T. (2014). Rethinking Impact: Applying Altmetrics to Southern African Research. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
18. Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin and C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of performance. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
19. Priem, J. & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7).
20. Rodgers, E. P. & Barbrow, S. (2013). A look at altmetrics and its growing significance to research libraries. Ann Arbor, MI, USA, The University of Michigan University Library.
21. Shema, H., J. Bar-Ilan & Thelwall, M., (2014). Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 1018-1027.
22. Sud, P. & Thelwall, M. (in press). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
23. Taylor, M. (2013). Towards a common model of citation: some thoughts on merging altmetrics and bibliometrics. Research Trends, 35, 19-22.
24. Thelwall, M. & Maflahi, N. (in press). Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
25. Weller, K. & Peters, I. (2012). Citations in Web 2.0. In A. Tokar, M. Beurskens, S. Keuneke et al. Science and the Internet (pp. 209-222). Germany, Düsseldorf: University Press.
26. Wets, K., Weedon, D. & Velterop, J. (2003). Post-publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000. Learned Publishing, 16(4), 249-258.
27. Wouters, P. & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control-tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht, The Netherlands: SURFfoundation.
28. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R. & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 1-23.