Tweeting links to academic articles

Cybermetrics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-8

  Thelwall, Mike ^a   Tsou, Andrew ^b   Weingart, Scott ^b   Holmberg, Kim ^a   Haustein, Stefanie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Altmetrics; Content analysis; Twitter; Webometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929653243     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11375019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., and Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone's an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65-74). New York: ACM Press.
2. Baldi, S. and Hargens, L.L. (2005). Reassessing the N-rays reference network: The role of self citations and negative citations, Scientometrics, 34(2): 239-253.
3. Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H. & Terliesner, J.(2012). Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social Web, 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Science-Metrix and OST, Montreal (pp. 98-109).
4. Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2010) (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
5. Cavalcanti, D.C., Prudêncio, B.C., Pradhan, S.S., Shah, J. and Pietrobon, R. (2011). Good to be bad? Distinguishing between positive and negative citations in scientific impact. 23rd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2011), Los Alamitos: IEEE (pp. 156-162).
6. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In 4th international ASSI conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM) (Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 8).
7. Desai, T., Shariff, A., Shariff, A., Kats, M., Fang, X. M., Christiano, C., and Ferris, M. (2012). Tweeting the meeting: An in-depth analysis of Twitter activity at kidney week 2011. PLOS ONE, 7(7), http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0040253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040253
8. Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4): e123.
9. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing - Its theory and application in Science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia, PA, ISI Press.
10. Huberman, B., Romero, D., and Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Available at SSRN 1313405.
11. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., and Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11): 2169-2188.
12. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (pp. 56-65). ACM.
13. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. and Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11): 2147-2164.
14. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., and Arlitt, M. (2008). A few chirps about Twitter. In Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks (pp. 19-24). ACM.
15. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 591-600). New York: ACM Press.
16. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1): 159-174.
17. Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
18. Priem, J., and Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2010) (pp. 1-4) doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701201
19. Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., and Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. ArXiv.org, http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745v1.
20. Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., and Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLOS ONE 7(5), e35869.
21. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., and Paltoglou, G. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2): 406-418.
22. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., and Paltoglou, G. (2012). Sentiment strength detection for the social Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1): 163-173.
23. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V. and Sugimoto, C. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates. PLOS ONE, 8(5), e64841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
24. Weller, K., Dröge, E., and Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation analysis in Twitter: Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. 1st Workshop on Making Sense of Microposts, Retrieved June 16, 2011 from: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-718/paper_04.pdf.
25. Zhao, D., and Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 243-252). New York: ACM Press.