Erratum: Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:3 (e0120495) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120495);Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Haustein, Stefanie ^a   Costas, Rodrigo ^b   Larivière, Vincent ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICINE; CITATION ANALYSIS; COMPUTER; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; EDITORIAL; ENGINEERING; GEOLOGY; HEALTH SCIENCE; MATHEMATICS; NATURAL SCIENCE; PREVALENCE; PUBLICATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIOLOGY; COOPERATION; HUMAN; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84924942750     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127830     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. Cole F, Eales N. The history of comparative anatomy. Part I: A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress. 1917; 11:578-96.
2. Gross PL, Gross EM. College libraries and chemical education. Science. 1927; 66(1713):385-9. PMID: 17782476
3. Lotka AJ (1926) The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Sciences. 1926; 16:317-23.
4. Zipf GK. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Press; 1949.
5. Bradford SC. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934; 137:85-6.
6. Garfield E. Science Citation Index - A new dimension in indexing. Science. 1964; 144(3619):649-54. PMID: 17806988
7. Clark BL. Multiple authorship trends in scientific papers. Science. 1964; 143(3608):822-4. PMID: 14088083
8. Falagas ME, Zarkali A, Karageorgopoulos DE, Bardakas V, Mavros MN. The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(2):e49476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476 PMID: 23405060
9. Lovaglia MJ. Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references. The American Sociologist. 1991; 22(1):49-64
10. Cole JR, Cole S. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1973.
11. Cronin B. The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham; 1984.
12. Merton RK. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1973.
13. Nicolaisen J. Citation Analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 2007; 41:609-41.
14. Wouters P. The Citation Culture. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 1999.
15. Zuckerman H. Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics. 1987; 12(5-6):329-38.
16. Edge D. Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review. History of Science. 1979; 17:102-34 PMID: 11610633
17. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Another test of the normative theory of citing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1987; 38:305-6.
18. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends in Biochemical Science. 1989; 14(1):8-12.
19. Bornmann L, Daniel HD. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation. 2008; 64(1):45-80
20. Neylon C, Wu S. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLOS Biology. 2009; 7(11): e1000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242 PMID: 19918558
21. Priem J, Hemminger BM. Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday. 2010; 15(7). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/2874/257022.
22. Prie J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, & Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto; 2010. Available from: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
23. Rousseau R, Ye FY (2013) A multi-metric approach for research evaluation. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2013; 58(26):10-2.
24. Haustein S, Bowman TD, Holmberg K, Tsou A, Sugimoto CR, Larivière V. Automated Twitter accounts in scholarly communication and their effects on tweets as impact indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4139
25. Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(5):e64841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 PMID: 23724101
26. Wouters P, Costas R. Users, narcissism and control-tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21 st century. Stichting: SURFfoundation; 2012. Available from: http://www.surf.nl/binaries/content/assets/surf/en/knowledgebase/2011/Users+narcissism+and+control.pdf
27. Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of "alternative metrics" in scientific publications. Scientometrics. 2014; 101(2):1491-513.
28. Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V. Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014; 65(4):656-69.
29. Robinson-García N, Torres-Salinas D, Zahedi Z, Costas R. New data, new possibilities: exploring the insides of Altmetric.com. El Profesional de La Informacion. 2014; 23(4):359-66.
30. Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters P. Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4321
31. Haustein S, Larivière V, Thelwall M, Amyot D, Peters I. Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? It - Information Technology. 2014; 56(5):207-15.
32. th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Montreal: Science-Metrix and OST; 2012 Sep 5-8; Vol. 2, p. 541-51.
33. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V. Who Reads Research Articles? An Altmetrics Analysis of Mendeley User Categories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015. Available from: http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/?cm1993/papers/WhoReadsResearchArticlesPreprint.pdf
34. Waltman L, Costas R. F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014; 65(3):433-45. PMID: 25346934
35. Neylon C. Altmetrics: What are they good for? PLOS Opens blog post from 3 October 2014. Available from: http://blogs.plos.org/opens/2014/10/03/altmetrics-what-are-they-good-for/
36. Harzing AW. Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences? Scientometrics. 2012; 94(1):23-34.
37. Sigogneau A. An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding papers recorded in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics. 2000; 47(3):589-604.
38. Van Leeuwen T, Costas R, Calero-Medina C, Visser M. The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics. 2012; 95(2):817-28.
39. Shema H, Bar-Ilan J, Thelwall M. How Is Research Blogged? A Content Analysis Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015.
40. Li X, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics. 2011; 91(2):461-71. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2010 PMID: 21527731
41. Biglu MH. The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect. Scientometrics. 2008; 74(3):453-70.
42. th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Montreal: Science-Metrix and OST; 2012 Sep 5-8; Vol. 2, p. 447-8.
43. Costas R, Van Leeuwen TN. Referencing Patterns of Individual Researchers: Do Top Scientists Rely on More Extensive Information Sources? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012; 63(12):2433-50.
44. Hsu J, Huang D. Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics. 2011; 86(2):317-24.
45. Onodera N, Yoshikane F. Factors Affecting Citation Rates of Research Articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015.
46. Webster GD, Jonason PK, Orozco T. Hot Topics and Popular Papers in Evolutionary Psychology: Analyses of Title Words and Citation Counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979-2008. Evolutionary Psychology. 2009; 7(3):348-62.
47. Larivière V, Sugimoto CR, Tsou A, Gingras Y. Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Forthcoming 2015. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8544 doi: 10.1002/asi.22796 PMID: 24729747
48. Bourdieu P. On Television. New York: The New Press; 1999.
49. Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2014; 98(2):1131-43.
50. Buter RK, van Raan AFJ. Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics. 2011; 5(4):60-17.
51. Lewison G, Hartley J. What's in a title? Number of words and the presence of colons. Scientometrics. 2005; 63(2):341-56.
52. Bordons M, Zulueta MA, Barrigon S. Scientific Activity of the Most Productive Spanish Research Teams in Pharmacology and Pharmacy During the Period 1986-1993 as Covered by the Science Citation Index (Sci). Medicina Clinica. 1998; 111(13):489-95. PMID: 9859065
53. Glänzel W, Schubert A. Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics. 2001; 50(2):199-214.
54. Herbertz H. Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology. Scientometrics. 1995; 33(1):117-22.