메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITATION ANALYSIS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84886624151     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (208)

References (21)
  • 1
    • 67650102702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs
    • doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005910
    • Allen L, Jones C, Dolby K, Lynn D, Walport M, (2009) Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PloS ONE 4: e5910 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005910.
    • (2009) PloS ONE , vol.4
    • Allen, L.1    Jones, C.2    Dolby, K.3    Lynn, D.4    Walport, M.5
  • 2
    • 84862762909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?
    • Wardle DA, (2010) Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 3: 11-15.
    • (2010) Ideas in Ecology and Evolution , vol.3 , pp. 11-15
    • Wardle, D.A.1
  • 4
    • 80052498597 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • RAE manager, Available
    • RAE manager (2009) RAE Manager's report. Available: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/manager/manager.pdf.
    • (2009) RAE Manager's report
  • 5
    • 84886602655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PA Consulting Group, Available
    • PA Consulting Group (2008) RAE 2008 Accountability Review. Available http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2009/rd0809/rd08_09.pdf.
    • (2008) RAE 2008 Accountability Review
  • 6
    • 18144371415 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • HM Treasury, Department of Trade and IndustryDepartment for Education and SkillsDepartment of Health
    • HM Treasury, Department of Trade and IndustryDepartment for Education and SkillsDepartment of Health (2006) Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: next steps available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk//http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/7/8/bud06_science_332v1.pdf.
    • (2006) Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: Next steps available at
  • 7
    • 67650667736 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures
    • doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
    • Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R, (2009) A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PloS ONE 4: e6022 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
    • (2009) PloS ONE , vol.4
    • Bollen, J.1    Van de Sompel, H.2    Hagberg, A.3    Chute, R.4
  • 8
    • 84886607857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor and the number of citations
    • Available
    • Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N (2013) The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor and the number of citations. Dryad data packages 'Wellcome Trust data' and 'F1000 data'. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2h4j5.
    • (2013) Dryad data packages 'Wellcome Trust data' and 'F1000 data'
    • Eyre-Walker, A.1    Stoletzki, N.2
  • 9
    • 0031013790 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sense and nonsense about the impact factor
    • Opthof T, (1997) Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc Res 33: 1-7.
    • (1997) Cardiovasc Res , vol.33 , pp. 1-7
    • Opthof, T.1
  • 10
    • 33750890118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications
    • Knothe G, (2006) Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 57: 1830-1839.
    • (2006) J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec , vol.57 , pp. 1830-1839
    • Knothe, G.1
  • 11
    • 76649129067 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact factor's matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics
    • Lariviere V, Gingras Y, (2010) The impact factor's matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 61: 424-427.
    • (2010) J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec , vol.61 , pp. 424-427
    • Lariviere, V.1    Gingras, Y.2
  • 12
    • 84989528862 scopus 로고
    • Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact
    • Seglen PO, (1994) Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Information Sci 45: 1-11.
    • (1994) J Am Soc Information Sci , vol.45 , pp. 1-11
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 13
    • 0343067710 scopus 로고
    • Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices
    • Wardle DA, (1995) Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices. Bull Ecol Soc Am 76: 102-104.
    • (1995) Bull Ecol Soc Am , vol.76 , pp. 102-104
    • Wardle, D.A.1
  • 14
  • 15
    • 11444250613 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
    • Leimu R, Koricheva J, (2005) What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends Ecol Evol 20: 28-32.
    • (2005) Trends Ecol Evol , vol.20 , pp. 28-32
    • Leimu, R.1    Koricheva, J.2
  • 16
    • 0032415217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: anetwork-analytic model
    • Baldi S, (1998) Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: anetwork-analytic model. Am Sociol Rev 63: 829-846.
    • (1998) Am Sociol Rev , vol.63 , pp. 829-846
    • Baldi, S.1
  • 17
    • 21844483487 scopus 로고
    • Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology
    • Davenport E, Snyder H, (1995) Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. J Doc 51: 404-410.
    • (1995) J Doc , vol.51 , pp. 404-410
    • Davenport, E.1    Snyder, H.2
  • 18
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen PO, (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314: 498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 19
    • 33745613796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature
    • Editors, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
    • Editors (2006) The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med 3: e291 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
    • (2006) PLoS Med , vol.3
  • 20
    • 84864870772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • REF manager, Available:. Higher Education Funding Council of England
    • REF manager (2012) Panel criteria and working methods. Available: http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdf. Higher Education Funding Council of England.
    • (2012) Panel criteria and working methods
  • 21
    • 58049205169 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • RAE manager, Available:. Higher Education Funding Council of England
    • RAE manager (2006) RAE 2008 Panel criteria and working methods: Panel D. Available: http://rae.ac.uk/pubs/2006/01/docs/d14.pdf. Higher Education Funding Council of England.
    • (2006) RAE 2008 Panel criteria and working methods: Panel D


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.