-
1
-
-
67650102702
-
Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs
-
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005910
-
Allen L, Jones C, Dolby K, Lynn D, Walport M, (2009) Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PloS ONE 4: e5910 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005910.
-
(2009)
PloS ONE
, vol.4
-
-
Allen, L.1
Jones, C.2
Dolby, K.3
Lynn, D.4
Walport, M.5
-
2
-
-
84862762909
-
Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact?
-
Wardle DA, (2010) Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 3: 11-15.
-
(2010)
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
, vol.3
, pp. 11-15
-
-
Wardle, D.A.1
-
4
-
-
80052498597
-
-
RAE manager, Available
-
RAE manager (2009) RAE Manager's report. Available: http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/manager/manager.pdf.
-
(2009)
RAE Manager's report
-
-
-
5
-
-
84886602655
-
-
PA Consulting Group, Available
-
PA Consulting Group (2008) RAE 2008 Accountability Review. Available http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2009/rd0809/rd08_09.pdf.
-
(2008)
RAE 2008 Accountability Review
-
-
-
6
-
-
18144371415
-
-
HM Treasury, Department of Trade and IndustryDepartment for Education and SkillsDepartment of Health
-
HM Treasury, Department of Trade and IndustryDepartment for Education and SkillsDepartment of Health (2006) Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: next steps available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk//http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/7/8/bud06_science_332v1.pdf.
-
(2006)
Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: Next steps available at
-
-
-
7
-
-
67650667736
-
A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures
-
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
-
Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R, (2009) A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PloS ONE 4: e6022 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
-
(2009)
PloS ONE
, vol.4
-
-
Bollen, J.1
Van de Sompel, H.2
Hagberg, A.3
Chute, R.4
-
8
-
-
84886607857
-
The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor and the number of citations
-
Available
-
Eyre-Walker A, Stoletzki N (2013) The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor and the number of citations. Dryad data packages 'Wellcome Trust data' and 'F1000 data'. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2h4j5.
-
(2013)
Dryad data packages 'Wellcome Trust data' and 'F1000 data'
-
-
Eyre-Walker, A.1
Stoletzki, N.2
-
9
-
-
0031013790
-
Sense and nonsense about the impact factor
-
Opthof T, (1997) Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc Res 33: 1-7.
-
(1997)
Cardiovasc Res
, vol.33
, pp. 1-7
-
-
Opthof, T.1
-
10
-
-
33750890118
-
Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications
-
Knothe G, (2006) Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 57: 1830-1839.
-
(2006)
J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec
, vol.57
, pp. 1830-1839
-
-
Knothe, G.1
-
11
-
-
76649129067
-
The impact factor's matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics
-
Lariviere V, Gingras Y, (2010) The impact factor's matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 61: 424-427.
-
(2010)
J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec
, vol.61
, pp. 424-427
-
-
Lariviere, V.1
Gingras, Y.2
-
12
-
-
84989528862
-
Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact
-
Seglen PO, (1994) Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Information Sci 45: 1-11.
-
(1994)
J Am Soc Information Sci
, vol.45
, pp. 1-11
-
-
Seglen, P.O.1
-
13
-
-
0343067710
-
Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices
-
Wardle DA, (1995) Journal citation impact factors and parochial citation practices. Bull Ecol Soc Am 76: 102-104.
-
(1995)
Bull Ecol Soc Am
, vol.76
, pp. 102-104
-
-
Wardle, D.A.1
-
14
-
-
0032548144
-
Region-based citation bias in science
-
Paris G, De Leo G, Menozzi P, Gatto M, (1998) Region-based citation bias in science. Nature 396: 210.
-
(1998)
Nature
, vol.396
, pp. 210
-
-
Paris, G.1
De Leo, G.2
Menozzi, P.3
Gatto, M.4
-
15
-
-
11444250613
-
What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
-
Leimu R, Koricheva J, (2005) What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends Ecol Evol 20: 28-32.
-
(2005)
Trends Ecol Evol
, vol.20
, pp. 28-32
-
-
Leimu, R.1
Koricheva, J.2
-
16
-
-
0032415217
-
Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: anetwork-analytic model
-
Baldi S, (1998) Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: anetwork-analytic model. Am Sociol Rev 63: 829-846.
-
(1998)
Am Sociol Rev
, vol.63
, pp. 829-846
-
-
Baldi, S.1
-
17
-
-
21844483487
-
Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology
-
Davenport E, Snyder H, (1995) Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. J Doc 51: 404-410.
-
(1995)
J Doc
, vol.51
, pp. 404-410
-
-
Davenport, E.1
Snyder, H.2
-
18
-
-
0031049280
-
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
-
Seglen PO, (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314: 498-502.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 498-502
-
-
Seglen, P.O.1
-
19
-
-
33745613796
-
The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature
-
Editors, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
-
Editors (2006) The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med 3: e291 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
-
(2006)
PLoS Med
, vol.3
-
-
-
20
-
-
84864870772
-
-
REF manager, Available:. Higher Education Funding Council of England
-
REF manager (2012) Panel criteria and working methods. Available: http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdf. Higher Education Funding Council of England.
-
(2012)
Panel criteria and working methods
-
-
-
21
-
-
58049205169
-
-
RAE manager, Available:. Higher Education Funding Council of England
-
RAE manager (2006) RAE 2008 Panel criteria and working methods: Panel D. Available: http://rae.ac.uk/pubs/2006/01/docs/d14.pdf. Higher Education Funding Council of England.
-
(2006)
RAE 2008 Panel criteria and working methods: Panel D
-
-
|