Defrosting the digital library: Bibliographic tools for the next generation web

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 10, 2008, Pages

  Hull, Duncan ^a   Pettifer, Steve R ^a   Kell, Douglas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; COLD STORAGE; DIGITAL STORAGE;

'CURRENT; BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; CITESEER; DATA AND METADATA; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; NEW APPLICATIONS; WEB OF KNOWLEDGE; WORK-FLOWS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LIBRARY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIBRARY SCIENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

SCOPUS;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIBRARIES, DIGITAL; LIBRARY AUTOMATION; LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 55449101991     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204     Document Type: Review

References (210)

1. Murray-Rust P (2007) Data-driven science - A scientist's view. NSF/JISC Repositories Workshop. Available: http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~repwkshop/papers/ murray.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2008.
2. Arms WY (2000) Digital libraries. Boston: MIT Press.
3. Soergel D (2002) A framework for digital library research. D-lib magazine 8. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/soergel/12soergel.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
4. Lesk M (2005) Understanding digital libraries, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Elsevier.
5. Samuel H (1963) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. Available: http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?entry = t93.e1580. Accessed 12 September 2008.
6. Roberts RJ, Varmus HE, Ashburner M, Brown PO, Eisen MB, et al. (2001) Information access. Building a "GenBank" of the published literature. Science 291: 2318-2319.
7. Anon (2003) MEDLINE Citation Counts by Year of Publication. Available: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/medline_cit_counts_yr_pub.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
8. Harnad S, Brody T, Vallieres F, Carr L, Hitchcock S, et al. (2008) The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials Review 34: 36-40.
9. Fayyad U, Uthurusamy R (2002) Evolving data mining into solutions for insights - Introduction. Communications of the ACM 45: 28-31.
10. Kostoff RN (2002) Overcoming specialization. Bioscience 52: 937-941.
11. Bradford SC (1934, 1985) Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering 137: 85-86. Reprinted 1985. J Information Science 10: 173-180.
12. Anderson CM (2006) The long tail: How endless choice is creating unlimited demand. London: Random House.
13. Suber P (2002) Open access to the scientific journal literature. J Biol 1: 3.
14. Albert KM (2006) Open access: Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 94: 253-262.
15. MacCallum CJ (2007) When is open access not open access? PLoS Biol 5: 2095-2097. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050285.
16. Bourne PE, Fink JL, Gerstein M (2008) Open access: Taking full advantage of the content. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000037. doi:101371.pcbi.1000037.
17. Johnson RK (2002) Institutional Repositories: Partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine 8: Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
18. Lynch CA (2003) Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Libr Acad 3: 327-336.
19. Giles J (2005) Science in the web age: Start your engines. Nature 438: 554-555.
20. Xia JFA, Sun L (2007) Factors to assess self-archiving in institutional repositories. Serials Review 33: 73-80.
21. Lawrence S (2001) Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature 411: 521.
22. Eysenbach G (2006) Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol 4: e157. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
23. MacCallum CJ, Parthasarathy H (2006) Open access increases citation rate. PLoS Biol 4: e176. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040176.
24. Cohen B (2004) PLoS Biology in action. PLoS Biol 2: E25. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020025.
25. Berners-Lee T, Fielding RT, Masinter L (2005) RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. Technical report. Available: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986. Accessed 12 September 2008.
26. O'Reilly T (2005) What Is Web 2.0? Technical report. Available: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
27. Dye J (2006) Folksonomy: A game of high-tech (and high-stakes) tag. Econtent 29: 38-43.
28. Furnas GW, Fake C, von Ahn L, Schachter J, Golder SA, et al. (2006) Why do tagging systems work? In: Olson GM, Jeffries R, eds. ACM. pp 36-39.
29. Williams AJ (2008) A perspective of publicly accessible/open-access chemistry databases. Drug Discov Today 13: 495-501.
30. Gerstein M, Seringhaus M, Fields S (2007) Structured digital abstract makes text mining easy. Nature 447: 142.
31. Seringhaus MR, Gerstein MB (2007) Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow's information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 17.
32. Leitner F, Valencia A (2008) A text-mining perspective on the requirements for electronically annotated abstracts. FEBS Lett 582: 1178-1181.
33. Seringhaus M, Gerstein M (2008) Manually structured digital abstracts: A scaffold for automatic text mining. FEBS Lett 582: 1170.
34. Superti-Furga G, Wieland F, Cesareni G (2008) Finally: The digital, democratic age of scientific abstracts. FEBS Lett 582: 1169.
35. Anon (2008) Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Prospect Project. Available: http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/ProjectProspect/Examples.asp. Accessed 12 September 2008.
36. Corbett P, Batchelor C, Teufel S (2007) Annotation of chemical named entities. BioNLP 2007: 57-64.
37. Batchelor CR, Corbett PT (2007) Semantic enrichment of journal articles using chemical named entity recognition. Proc ACL. pp 45-48.
38. Murray-Rust P (2008) Chemistry for everyone. Nature 451: 648-651.
39. Ananiadou S, McNaught J, eds (2006) Text mining in biology and biomedicine. London: Artech House.
40. Ananiadou S, Kell DB, Tsujii J-i (2006) Text Mining and its potential applications in Systems Biology. Trends Biotechnol 24: 571-579.
41. Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P (2006) Literature mining for the biologist: From information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet 7: 119-129.
42. Anon (2008) National Centre for Text Mining (NaCTeM) Software tools. Available: http://www.nactem.ac.uk/software.php. Accessed 12 September 2008.
43. Smalheiser NR (2005) The Arrowsmith project: 2005 status report. LNCS 3735: 26-43.
44. Anon (2007) The Arrowsmith Project Homepage. Available: http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/arrowsmith_uic/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
45. Hristovski D, Peterlin B, Mitchell JA, Humphrey SM (2005) Using literature-based discovery to identify disease candidate genes. Int J Med Inform 74: 289-298.
46. Kostoff RN (2006) Systematic acceleration of radical discovery and innovation in science and technology. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 73: 923-936.
47. Yetisgen-Yildiz M, Pratt W (2006) Using statistical and knowledge-based approaches for literature-based discovery. J Biomed Informatics 39: 600-611.
48. Kostoff RN (2007) Validating discovery in literature-based discovery. J Biomed Inform 40: 448-450. Author reply, pp. 450-442.
49. Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, Solka JL, Rushenberg RL (2008) Literature-related discovery (LRD): Methodology. Technol Forecast Soc Change; doi:10.1016/j. techfore.2007.1011.1010.
50. Cronin B (2001) Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science 27: 1-7.
51. Kasztler A, Leitner KH (2002) Bibliometric analysis and visualisation of intellectual capital. J Universal Comp Sci 8: 516-525.
52. Tabah AN (1999) Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 34: 249-286.
53. Börner K, Chen CM, Boyack KW (2003) Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37: 179-255.
54. Errami M, Hicks JM, Fisher W, Trusty D, Wren JD, et al. (2008) Déjà vu: A study of duplicate citations in Medline. Bioinformatics 24: 243-249.
55. Arms WY (2001) Uniform resource names: Handles, PURLs and digital object identifiers. Comm ACM 44: 68.
56. DeRisi S, Kennison R, Twyman N (2003) The what and whys of DOIs. PLoS Biol 1: e57. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000057.
57. Anon (2008) crossref.org: dois for research content. Available: http://www.crossref.org/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
58. Jacobs I, Walsh N (2004) Architecture of the World Wide Web, Vol 1. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
59. Hey T, Trefethen AE (2005) Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science 308: 817-821.
60. Hoffmann R (2008) A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nat Genet 40: 1047-1051.
61. Salzberg SL (2007) Genome re-annotation: A wiki solution? Genome Biol 8: 102.
62. Mons B, Ashburner M, Chichester C, van Mulligen E, Weeber M, et al. (2008) Calling on a million minds for community annotation in WikiProteins. Genome Biol 9: R89.
63. Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M (1999) Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web, by its inventor. Texere Publishing.
64. Anon (2008) The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Portal. Available: http://portal.acm.org/portal.cfm. Accessed 12 September 2008.
65. Goodman DJ (2007) Introduction and evaluation of martlet: A scientific workflow language for abstracted parallelisation. Edinburgh: ACM. pp 983-992. doi:10.1145/1242572.1242705.
66. Anon (2008) EndNote - Bibliographies Made Easy. Available: http://www.endnote.com. Accessed 12 September 2008.
67. Kopka H, Daly PW (1999) A guide to LaTeX. New York: Addison-Wesley.
68. Anon (2008) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. Accessed 12 September 2008.
69. Liu Y, Navathe SB, Civera J, Dasigi V, Ram A, et al. (2005) Text mining biomedical literature for discovering gene-to-gene relationships: A comparative study of algorithms. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2: 62-76.
70. Ley M (2008) The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
71. Ley M (2002) The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography: Evolution, Research Issues, Perspectives. LNCS 2476: 1-10.
72. Altman RB (2004) Building successful biological databases. Brief Bioinform 5: 4-5.
73. Reuther P, Walter B, Ley M, Weber A, Klink S (2006) Managing the quality of person names in DBLP. LNCS 4172: 508-511.
74. Qiu J (2008) Scientific publishing: Identity crisis. Nature 451: 766-767.
75. Anon (2008) NCBI Pubmed.gov: A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health. Available: http://www.pubmed. gov. Accessed 12 September 2008.
76. Trawick BW, McEntyre J (2004) Chap 1, Bibliographic databases. In: Sansom C, Horton R, eds. The Internet for Molecular Biologists: A Practical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 1-16.
77. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, et al. (2007) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D5-D12.
78. Anon (2008) PubMed Central (PMC) is the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) free digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
79. Anon (2008) UK PubMed Central: Free archive of Life Science Journals. Available: http://ukpmc.ac.uk/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
80. Wang X, Gorlitsky R, Almeida JS (2005) From XML to RDF: How semantic web technologies will change the design of 'omic' standards. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1099-1103.
81. Anon (2008) Open Archives Initiative. Available: http://www.openarchives. org/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
82. Anon (2008) Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Knowledge (WoK). Available: http://isiknowledge.com/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
83. Stein L (1998) Official guide to programming with CGI.pm. New York: Wiley.
84. Garfield E (2001) Impact factors, and why they won't go away. Nature 411: 522.
85. Glänzel W, Moed HF (2002) Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 53: 171-193.
86. Garfield E (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178: 471-479.
87. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 16569-16572.
88. Burnham JF (2006) Scopus database: A review. Biomed Digit Libr 3: 1.
89. Apps A, Macintyre R (2006) Why OpenURL? D-Lib Magazine 12. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may06/apps/05apps.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
90. Lord P, Bechhofer S, Wilkinson MD, Schiltz G, Gessler D, et al. (2004) Applying Semantic Web services to bioinformatics: Experiences gained, lessons learnt. LNCS 3298: 350-364.
91. Hendrix IC (2004) Refworks. J Med Libr Assoc 92: 111-113.
92. Anon (2008) CiteSeer. IST Scientific Literature Digital Library. Available: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
93. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, et al. (2004) UniProt: The Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D115-D119.
94. Anon (2006) Most cited authors in Computer Science with article citation counts normalized by publication year. Available: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ allcitedn.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
95. Anon (2008) Google Scholar. Available: http://scholar.google.com. Accessed 12 September 2008.
96. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L (2006) Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr 3: 7.
97. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22: 338-342.
98. Hartman KA, Bowering Mullen L (2008) Google Scholar and academic libraries: An update. New Library World 109: 211-222.
99. Jacsó P (2008) Savvy searching - Google Scholar revisited. Online Information Review 32: 102-114.
100. Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comp Netw ISDN Syst 30: 107-117.
101. Kilgarriff A (2007) Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33: 147-151.
102. Oinn T, Greenwood M, Addis M, Alpdemir MN, Ferris J, et al. (2006) Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience 18: 1067-1100.
103. Anon (2008) arXiv.org e-Print archive: Open Access to e-prints in Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology and Statistics. Available: http://arxiv.org/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
104. Ginsparg P (2004) Scholarly information architecture, 1989-2015. Data Science J 3: 29-37.
105. Watts DJ, Dodds PS, Newman ME (2002) Identity and search in social networks. Science 296: 1302-1305.
106. Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L (2006) Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Amer Soc Inf Sci Technol 57: 1060-1072.
107. Anon (2008) Citebase Search. Available: http://www.citebase.org/. Accessed 18 September 2008.
108. Anon (2000) HighWire Press is 5 years old. J Biol Chem 275: 13165.
109. Anon (2008) WorldCat, a global catalog of library collections. Available: http://www.worldcat.org/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
110. Howison J, Goodrum A (2004) Why can't I manage academic papers like MP3s? The evolution and intent of metadata standards. Proc 2004 Colleges, Code and Intellectual Property Conference. Available: http://www.freelancepropaganda.com/ archives/MP3vPDF.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2008.
111. Zhao J, Goble C, Stevens R (2006) An identity crisis in the life sciences. LNCS 4145: 254-269.
112. Draghici S, Sellamuthu S, Khatri P (2006) Babel's tower revisited: A universal resource for cross-referencing across annotation databases. Bioinformatics 22: 2934-2939.
113. Falagas ME (2006) Unique author identification number in scientific databases: A suggestion. PLoS Med 3: e249. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030249.
114. Anon (2008) Google 101: How Google crawls, indexes, and serves the web. Available: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl= en&answer=70897. Accessed 12 September 2008.
115. Schrenk M (2007) Webbots, Spiders and Screenscapers: A guide to developing Internet agents with PHP/CURL. San Francisco: No Starch Press.
116. Hammersley B (2005) Developing feeds with RSS and ATOM. Sebastopol (California): O'Reilly & Associates.
117. Sayre R (2005) Atom: The standard in syndication. IEEE Internet Computing 9: 71-78.
118. Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, Goble C, Pocock MR, et al. (2006) Taverna: A tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W729-W732.
119. Curcin V, Ghanem M, Guo Y (2005) Web services in the life sciences. Drug Discov Today 10: 865-871.
120. Neerincx PB, Leunissen JA (2005) Evolution of web services in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 6: 178-188.
121. Fernández JM, Hoffmann R, Valencia A (2007) iHOP web services. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W21-W26.
122. Richardson L, Riuby S (2007) RESTful web services. Sebastopol (California): O'Reilly.
123. Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider PF, Harmelen Fv (2003) From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language. J Web Semantics 1: 7-26.
124. Hoffmann R, Krallinger M, Andres E, Tamames J, Blaschke C, et al. (2005) Text mining for metabolic pathways, signaling cascades, and protein networks. Sci STKE 2005: pe21.
125. Hunter L, Cohen KB (2006) Biomedical Language Processing: What's Beyond PubMed? Mol Cell 21: 589-594.
126. Cohen KB, Hunter L (2008) Getting started in text mining. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e20. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040020.
127. Arms WY (2000) Automated digital libraries: How effectively can computers be used for the skilled tasks of professional librarianship? D-lib magazine 6. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july00/arms/07arms.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
128. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J (2001) Publishing on the semantic web. Nature 410: 1023-1024.
129. Hendler J (2003) Science and the semantic Web. Science 299: 520-521.
130. Davies J, Studer R, Warren PV (2006) Semantic web technologies: Trends and research in ontology-based systems. Chichester: Wiley.
131. Baker CJO, Cheung K-H, eds (2007) Semantic web: Revolutionizing knowledge discovery in the life sciences. New York: Springer.
132. Ruttenberg A, Clark T, Bug W, Samwald M, Bodenreider O, et al. (2007) Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web. BMC Bioinformatics 8(Supplement 3): S2.
133. McCool R (2005) Rethinking the Semantic Web, Part I. IEEE Internet Computing 9: 86-88.
134. McCool R (2006) Rethinking the Semantic Web, Part 2. IEEE Internet Computing 10: 93-96.
135. Fielding RT, Gettys J, Mogul J, Frystyk H, Masinter L, et al. (1999) RFC 2616 Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.1. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Available: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616. Accessed 12 September 2008.
136. Stein L (2002) Creating a bioinformatics nation. Nature 417: 119-120.
137. Anon (2007) Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Media Types.
138. Clark T, Martin S, Liefeld T (2004) Globally distributed object identification for biological knowledgebases. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5: 59-70.
139. Page RD (2008) LSID Tester, a tool for testing Life Science Identifier resolution services. Source Code Biol Med 3: 2.
140. Page R (2008) bioGUID: Bootstrapping the biodiversity semantic web. Available: http://bioguid.info/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
141. Anon (2008) Library of Congress Metadata Object Description Schema: MODS. Available: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
142. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316: 1036-1039.
143. Anon (2008) Zotero: The Next-Generation Research Tool. Available: http://www.zotero.org/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
144. Anon (2008) Mendeley - Manage and Share Research Papers - Discover Research Data. Available: http://www.mendeley.com. Accessed 12 September 2008.
145. Anon (2008) LinkOut: A configurable hyperlinking system. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/linkout/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
146. Griekspoor A, Groothius T (2008) mekentosj papers: Your personal library of science. Available: http://mekentosj.com/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
147. Courtland R (2008) Programs promise to end PDF paper-chase. Nature 453: 12.
148. Sinclair J, Cardew-Hall M (2008) The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful? J Information Sci 34: 15-29.
149. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Abacus.
150. Emamy K, Cameron RG (2007) Citeulike: A researcher's social bookmarking service. Ariadne 51. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue51/emamycameron/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
151. Anon (2008) Delicious: A social bookmarks manager. Available: http://www. delicious.com. Accessed 18 September 2008.
152. Bao S, Xue G, Wu X, Yu Y, Fei B, et al. (2007) Optimizing web search using social annotations. Proc 16th Int Conf on World Wide Web: ACM. pp 501-510.
153. Anon (2008) CiteULike Datasets. Available: http://www.citeulike.org/faq/ data.adp. Accessed 12 September 2008.
154. Castrillo JI, Zeef LA, Hoyle DC, Zhang N, Hayes A, et al. (2007) Growth control of the eukaryote cell: A systems biology study in yeast. J Biol 6: 4.
155. Anon (2008) Deciphering citation statistics. Nature Neurosci 11: 619.
156. Lund B, Hammond T, Flack M, Hannay T (2005) Social bookmarking tools (II): A case study - Connotea. D-Lib Magazine 11. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/april2005-lund. Accessed 12 September 2008.
157. Rivest R (1992) RFC 1321 The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm. Technical report. Available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1321. Accessed 16 September 2008.
158. Hull D (2006) Buggotea: Redundant links in Connotea. Available: http://duncan.hull.name/2006/12/12/buggotea-redundant-links-in-connotea/. Accessed 16 September 2008.
159. Anon (2008) Connotea Code. Available: http://www.connotea.org/code. Accessed 12 September 2008.
160. Good B, Kawas E, Wilkinson M (2007) Bridging the gap between social tagging and semantic annotation: E.D. the Entity Describer: Nature Precedings. Nature Precedings.
161. Eaton AD (2006) HubMed: A Web-based biomedical literature search interface. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W745-W747.
162. Anon (2008) All articles tagged defrost in CiteULike. Available: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/defrost. Accessed 16 September 2008.
163. Roberts RM (1989) Serendipity: Accidental discoveries in science. New York: Wiley.
164. Torvik VI, Smalheiser NR (2007) A quantitative model for linking two disparate sets of articles in MEDLINE. Bioinformatics 23: 1658-1665.
165. Smalheiser NR, Torvik VI, Bischoff-Grethe A, Burhans LB, Gabriel M, et al. (2006) Collaborative development of the Arrowsmith two node search interface designed for laboratory investigators. J Biomed Discov Collab 1: 8.
166. Swanson DR, Smalheiser NR, Torvik VI (2006) Ranking indirect connections in literature-based discovery: The role of medical subject headings. J Amer Soc Inf Sci Technol 57: 1427-1439.
167. Zhou W, Yu C, Smalheiser N, Torvik V, Hong J (2007) Knowledge-intensive conceptual retrieval and passage extraction of biomedical literature. Proc 30th SIGIR. pp 655-662.
168. Courtney N (2007) Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User: {Libraries Unlimited}.
169. Waldrop M (2008) Science 2.0 - Is Open Access Science the Future?: Scientific American. Available: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id =science-2-point-0. Accessed 18 September 2008.
170. Barga RS, Andrews S, Parastatidis S (2007) The British Library Research Information Centre (RIC). In: Cox SJ, ed. Proc UK e-Science All Hands Meeting 2007: National e-Science Centre. pp 454-461.
171. Lassila O, Hendler J (2007) Embracing "Web 3.0". IEEE Internet Computing 11: 90-93.
172. Golbeck J (2007) The dynamics of web-based social networks: Membership, relationships, and change. First Monday 12. Available: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/ cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2023. Accessed 12 September 2008.
173. Bailey D, Zanders E (2008) Drug discovery in the era of facebook-new tools for scientific networking. Drug Discovery Today.
174. Anon (2007) OpenSocial - Google Code: The web is better when it's social. Available: http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
175. Bourne P (2005) Will a biological database be different from a biological journal? PLoS Comput Biol 1: 179-181. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010034.
176. Anon (2007) Compete, collaborate, compel. Nat Genet 39: 931.
177. Nardi BA, Schiano DJ, Gumbrecht M, Swartz L (2004) Why we blog. Comm ACM 47: 41-46.
178. Bonetta L (2007) Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell 129: 443-445.
179. Butler D (2006) Top five science blogs. Nature 44: 9.
180. Galperin MY (2008) The Molecular Biology Database Collection: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D2-D4.
181. Kell DB, Oliver SG (2004) Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. Bioessays 26: 99-105.
182. Brent R, Lok L (2005) A fishing buddy for hypothesis generators. Science 308: 504-506.
183. Adie E (2008) Postgenomic. Available: http://postgenomic.com/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
184. Goble C, Wroe C (2004) The Montagues and the Capulets. Comp Func Genomics 5: 623-632.
185. Hendler J (2007) Reinventing academic publishing - Part I. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22: 2-3.
186. Sinnott RO, Jiang J, Watt J, Ajayi O (2006) Shibboleth-based access to and usage of grid resources. Proc 7th IEEE/ACM International Conf Grid Computing. pp 136-143.
187. Recordon D, Reed D (2006) OpenID 2.0: A platform for user-centric identity management. In: Juels A, Winslett M, Goto A, eds (2006) Digital Identity Management: ACM. pp 11-16.
188. myExperiment - A Web 2.0 Virtual Research Environment Proc International Workshop on Virtual Research Environments and Collaborative Work Environments; May 2007; Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Available: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13961/. Accessed 18 September 2008.
189. Ginsparg P (2001) Creating a global knowledge network. Proc 2nd ICSU Press-UNESCO Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science. Available: http://arxiv.org/blurb/pg01unesco.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
190. Bradley J-C (2007) Open Notebook Science Using Blogs and Wikis. Nature Precedings.
191. Giordano R (2007) The scientist: Secretive, selfish or reticent? A social network analysis. In E-Social Science 2007. Available: http://ess.si.umich.edu/ papers/paper166.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2008.
192. Spinellis D (2003) The decay and failures of web references. Comm ACM 46: 71-77.
193. Dellavalle RP, Hester EJ, Heilig LF, Drake AL, Kuntzman JW, et al. (2003) Going, going, gone: Lost Internet references. Science 302: 787-788.
194. Wren JD (2004) 404 not found: The stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE. Bioinformatics 20: 668-672.
195. Berners-Lee T (1998) Hypertext Style: Cool URIs don't change. Available: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI. Accessed 12 September 2008.
196. Bar-Yossef Z, Broder AZ, Kumar R, Tomkins A (2004) Sic transit gloria telae: Towards an understanding of the web's decay. Proc WWW '0413th Int Conf on World Wide Web: ACM Press. pp 328-337.
197. Anon (2008) The Internet Archive. Available: http://www.archive.org. Accessed 12 September 2008.
198. Kahle B, Prelinger R, Jackson ME (2001) Public access to digital material. DLib Magazine 7. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october01/kahle/ 10kahle.html. Accessed 12 September 2008.
199. Hellman E (2005) OpenURL COinS: A Convention to Embed Bibliographic Metadata in HTML. Available: http://ocoins.info/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
200. Gomez J (2008) Print is dead: Books in our digital age. London: Macmillan.
201. Barry T, Richardson J (1997) Death of the journal: Will it be replaced by document delivery? Available: http://tony-barry.emu.id.au/pubs/1997/cause97/ paper.rtf. Accessed 16 September 2008.
202. Clark T, Kinoshita J (2007) Alzforum and SWAN: The present and future of scientific web communities. Brief Bioinform 8: 163-171.
203. Stein L (2008) Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences: Progress, visions and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 9: 678-688.
204. Buetow KH (2005) Cyberinfrastructure: Empowering a "third way" in biomedical research. Science 308: 821-824.
205. Foster I (2005) Service-oriented science. Science 308: 814-817.
206. Anon (2006) Science Foo Camp (scifoo). Available: http://www.nature.com/ scifoo/. Accessed 12 September 2008.
207. Buzan T (2002) How to mind map. London: Thorsons.
208. Wilkins J (2008) The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 411-413.
209. Schmidt G (2008) To blog or not to blog? Nature Geosci 1: 208-208.
210. Lacy LW (2005) OWL: Representing information using the web ontology language. Crewe: Trafford Publishing.