Assessment of the incremental benefit of computer-aided detection (CAD) for interpretation of CT colonography by experienced and inexperienced readers

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Boone, Darren ^a   Mallett, Susan ^b   McQuillan, Justine ^a   Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^c   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WORK EXPERIENCE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84944810506     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136624     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9873):1194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62186-2 PMID: 23414650.
2. Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9873):1185-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62124-2 PMID: 23414648.
3. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, van Ballegooijen M, Nio CY, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. The lancet oncology. 2012; 13(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70283-2 PMID: 22088831.
4. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. The New England journal of medicine. 2008; 359(12):1207-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996 PMID: 18799557; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2654614.
5. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, Franaszek M, Bitter I, Brickman D, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129(6):1832-44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.054 PMID: 16344052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1576342.
6. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, Maier A, Graser A, Weber M, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-rowCTcolonography. European radiology. 2007; 17(10):2598-607. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0608-z PMID: 17351780.
7. Regge D, Della Monica P, Galatola G, Laudi C, Zambon A, Correale L, et al. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology. 2013; 266(1):168-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120376 PMID: 23151831.
8. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Roddie M, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131(6):1690-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.051 PMID: 17087934.
9. Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, Hinshaw JL, Frew MI, Winter TC, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology. 2010; 256(3):827-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091890 PMID: 20663975; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2923726.
10. Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, McQuillan J, Proud M, Beddoe G, et al. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multi-observer study. Radiology. 2011; 258(2):469-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100354 PMID: 21084409.
11. Obuchowski NA, Hillis SL. Sample size tables for computer-aided detection studies. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2011; 197(5):W821-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6764 PMID: 22021528; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3494304.
12. Mang T, Bogoni L, Anand VX, Chandra D, Curtin AJ, Lev-Toaff AS, et al. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography. European radiology. 2014; 24(7):1466-76. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3158-1 PMID: 24816931.
13. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, Yeshwant SC, Brown L, Iuliano EM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology. 2008; 246(1):148-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2453062161 PMID: 18096536.
14. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. European radiology. 2007; 17(2):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y PMID: 16967260.
15. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005; 237(3):893-904. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373050176 PMID: 16304111.
16. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, McFarland EG, Paulson EK, Yee J, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology. 2008; 246(2):463-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070190 PMID: 18094263.
17. Boone D, Mallett S, Zhu S, Yao GL, Bell N, Ghanouni A, et al. Patients'& healthcare professionals'values regarding true- & false-positive diagnosis when colorectal cancer screening by CT colonography: discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e80767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080767 PMID: 24349014; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3857178.
18. Mallett S, Halligan S, Thompson M, Collins GS, Altman DG. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care. Bmj. 2012; 345:e3999. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3999 PMID: 22750423.
19. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: A discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. European radiology. 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3487-0 PMID: 25599932.
20. Mallett S, Halligan S, Collins GS, Altman DG. Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography. PloS one. 2014; 9(10): e107633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107633 PMID: 25353643; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4212964.
21. Taylor SA, Burling D, Roddie M, Honeyfield L, McQuillan J, Bassett P, et al. Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training. The British journal of radiology. 2008; 81(963):180-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/93375459 PMID: 18180260.
22. Neri E, Faggioni L, Regge D, Vagli P, Turini F, Cerri F, et al. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists. European journal of radiology. 2011; 80(2):303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.014 PMID: 20832219.
23. Lieberman D. Debate: small (6-9 mm) and diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps noted on CTC: how should they be managed? Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America. 2010; 20(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.012 PMID: 20451813.
24. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005; 236(1):3-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2361041926 PMID: 15987959.
25. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. Bmj. 2000; 320(7250):1635-40. PMID: 10856064; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC27408.
26. Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C, Hassan C, Segnan N, Campanella D, et al. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection. Investigative radiology. 2014; 49(3):173-82. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000009 PMID: 24442160.
27. Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Dwarkasing RS, de Haan MC, Jansen RJ, et al. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers. Radiology. 2011; 258(2):477-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100019 PMID: 21177395.