Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: A randomised controlled trial

The Lancet Oncology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 55-64

  Stoop, Esther M ^a   de Haan, Margriet C ^b   de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R ^b   Bossuyt, Patrick M ^b   van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ^a   Nio, C Yung ^b   van de Vijver, Marc J ^b   Biermann, Katharina ^a   Thomeer, Maarten ^a   van Leerdam, Monique E ^a   Fockens, Paul ^b   Stoker, Jaap ^b   Kuipers, Ernst J ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; NON CATHARTIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; PATIENT SAFETY; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84855329616     PISSN: 14702045     EISSN: 14745488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70283-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007, 18:581-592.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:71-96.
3. Bevolkingsonderzoek naar darmkanker 2009, Gezondheidsraad, Gezondheidsraad, Den Haag, publicatienr. 2009/13., (accessed Oct 20, 2011). http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/nl/adviezen/bevolkingsonderzoek-naar-darmkankerl.
4. Heresbach D, Manfredi S, D'Halluin PN, Bretagne JF, Branger B Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 18:427-433.
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1977-1981. and the National Polyp Study Workgroup.
6. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:343-350.
7. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:352-359.
8. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?. Gut 2006, 55:1145-1150.
9. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U Protection from right-sided and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:89-95.
10. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009, 41:941-951.
11. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:307-314.
12. de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, Bipat S, Stoker J Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011, 21:1747-1763.
13. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemens. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:367-376.
14. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:1300-1311.
15. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1403-1412.
16. de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM, et al. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2010, 10:47.
17. Pocock SJ, Simon R Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975, 31:103-115.
18. Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut 2010, 59:62-68.
19. van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Verbeek AL, et al. Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Cancer 2011, 128:1908-1917.
20. van Roon AH, Wilschut JA, Hol L, et al. Diagnostic yield improves with collection of 2 samples in fecal immunochemical test screening without affecting attendance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 9:333-339.
21. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:627-637. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
22. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(4 suppl):S16-S28.
23. de Vries AH, Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, et al. Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers?. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:1939-1950.
24. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.
25. Nagengast FM, Kaandorp CJ Revised CBO guideline " Follow-up after polypectomy" Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001, 145:2022-2025. (in Dutch).
26. McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, et al. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 2008, 248:717-720. American Cancer Society, US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal CancerUS Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, American College of RadiologyAmerican College of Radiology.
27. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:343-348.
28. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000, 47:251-255.
29. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002, 12:1-9.
30. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 375:1624-1633. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial Investigators.
31. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009, 58:241-248.
32. Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SH, et al. The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008, 42:791-798.
33. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
34. Scott RG, Edwards JT, Fritschi L, Foster NM, Mendelson RM, Forbes GM Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1145-1151.
35. Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, et al. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers. Radiology 2011, 258:477-487.
36. Lisi D, Hassan CC, Crespi M Participation in colorectal cancer screening with FOBT and colonoscopy: an Italian, multicentre, randomized population study. Dig Liver Dis 2010, 42:371-376. AMOD Study Group.
37. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:2304-2312.
38. Bokemeyer B, Bock H, Hüppe D, et al. Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention: results from a German online registry on 269000 cases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 21:650-655.
39. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:162-168. for Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380.
40. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1100-1105.
41. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:1863-1872.
42. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008, 299:1027-1035.
43. de González AB, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a Risk-Benefit Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196:816-823.