Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers

Radiology

Volumn 258, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 477-487

  Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^b   Dwarkasing, Roy S ^c   De Haan, Margriet C ^a   Jansen, Roel J ^a   Kauffman, Dominique ^a   Van Der Leij, Christiaan ^a   De Lijster, Manou S ^a   Lute, Cindy C ^a   Van Der Paardt, Marije P ^a   Thomeer, Maarten G ^c   Zijlstra, IJsbrand A ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; LOGISTIC MODELS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79952343791     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100019     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dachman AH, Kelly KB, Zintsmaster MP, et al. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology 2008;249(1):167-177.
2. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study. Radiology 2007;242(1):152-161.
3. Gluecker T, Meuwly JY, Pescatore P, et al. Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2002;12(6):1405-1409. (Pubitemid 36940215)
4. Hock D, Ouhadi R, Materne R, et al. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection. Radiology 2008;248(3):860-868.
5. Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E, et al. Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 2006;16(10):2275-2283. (Pubitemid 44349876)
6. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yee J. Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough? Radiology 2005;237(1):26-27.
7. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004;14(6):1025-1033. (Pubitemid 38787248)
8. Jensch S, van Gelder RE, Florie J, et al. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(3):W249-W255.
9. Taylor PM. A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training. Acad Radiol 2007;14(10):1252-1263. (Pubitemid 47432758)
10. Scriven M. Beyond formative and summative evaluation. In:McLaughlin MW, Phillips E, eds. Evaluation and education: a quarter century. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
11. McFarland EG, Fletcher JG, Pickhardt P, et al. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper:status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6(11):756-772.e4.
12. Rockey DC, Barish M, Brill JV, et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007;133(3):1005-1024. (Pubitemid 47376890)
13. Burling D;International Collaboration for CT Colonography Standards. CT colonography standards. Clin Radiol 2010;65(6):474-480.
14. Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2009;58(9):1242-1249.
15. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol 2010;20(2):367-376.
16. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S, et al. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 2009;19(7):1723-1730.
17. Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. RadioGraphics 2007;27(2):431-454.
18. Nio CY, de Vries AH, Stoker J. Perceptive errors in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2007;32(5):556-570. (Pubitemid 47594243)
19. Serlie IW, Vos FM, Truyen R, Post FH, van Vliet LJ. Classifying CT image data into material fractions by a scale and rotation invariant edge model. IEEE Trans Image Process 2007;16(12):2891-2904. (Pubitemid 350201223)
20. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, van Rijn AF, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population. Abdom Imaging doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9586-8. Published online November 4, 2009.
21. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134(5):1570-1595.
22. Ferrucci JT. Double-contrast barium enema: use in practice and implications for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):170-173. (Pubitemid 46100164)
23. Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps > or = 6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(2):374-385. (Pubitemid 351196608)
24. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978;13(3):175-181. (Pubitemid 8368823)
25. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11(7):750-756. (Pubitemid 38881318)
26. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006;16(8):1745-1749. (Pubitemid 44027376)
27. Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Engelby T, et al. Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2005;12(1):67-73. (Pubitemid 40187289)
28. de Vries AH, Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, et al. Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. is there a difference for novices and experienced readers? Eur Radiol 2009;19(8):1939-1950.