Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2598-2607

  Mang, Thomas ^a   Peloschek, Philipp ^a   Plank, Christina ^a   Maier, Andrea ^a   Graser, Anno ^b   Weber, Michael ^a   Herold, Christian ^a   Bogoni, Luca ^c   Schima, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Siemens Medical Solutions ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Computer aided detection; CT colonography; Polyp; Virtual endoscopy

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; COLON TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 39049088054     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0608-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. SA Taylor A Laghi P Lefere S Halligan J Stoker 2006 European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography Eur Radiol 17 575 579 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y
2. S Halligan DG Altman SA Taylor S Mallett JJ Deeks CI Bartram W Atkin 2005 CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting Radiology 237 893 904 16304111 10.1148/radiol.2373050176 (Pubitemid 41636379)
3. PB Cotton VL Durkalski BC Pineau YY Palesch PD Mauldin B Hoffman DJ Vining WC Small J Affronti D Rex KK Kopecky S Ackerman JS Burdick C Brewington MA Turner A Zfass AR Wright RB Iyer P Lynch MV Sivak H Butler 2004 Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia JAMA 291 1713 1719 15082698 10.1001/jama.291.14.1713 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjt1WktLk%3D (Pubitemid 38489893)
4. CD Johnson WS Harmsen LA Wilson RL Maccarty TJ Welch DM Ilstrup DA Ahlquist 2003 Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps Gastroenterology 125 311 319 12891530 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1 (Pubitemid 36929410)
5. PJ Pickhardt JR Choi I Hwang JA Butler ML Puckett HA Hildebrandt RK Wong PA Nugent PA Mysliwiec WR Schindler 2003 Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 2191 2200 14657426 10.1056/NEJMoa031618 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1SqtL0%3D (Pubitemid 37485135)
6. DC Rockey E Paulson D Niedzwiecki W Davis HB Bosworth L Sanders J Yee J Henderson P Hatten S Burdick A Sanyal DT Rubin M Sterling G Akerkar MS Bhutani K Binmoeller J Garvie EJ Bini K McQuaid WL Foster WM Thompson A Dachman R Halvorsen 2005 Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison Lancet 365 305 311 15664225 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FjvVWgtQ%3D%3D
7. JT Ferrucci 2005 Colonoscopy: virtual and optical-another look, another view Radiology 235 13 16 15798163 10.1148/radiol.2351041556 (Pubitemid 40432228)
8. S Halligan W Atkin 2005 Unbiased studies are needed before virtual colonoscopy can be dismissed Lancet 365 275 276 15664205
9. T Gluecker JY Meuwly P Pescatore P Schnyder J Delarive P Jornod R Meuli G Dorta 2002 Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography Eur Radiol 12 1405 1409 12042946 10.1007/s00330-001-1280-3 (Pubitemid 36940215)
10. SA Taylor S Halligan D Burling S Morley P Bassett W Atkin CI Bartram 2004 CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance Eur Radiol 14 1025 1033 14872280 10.1007/s00330-004-2262-z (Pubitemid 38787248)
11. A Slater SA Taylor E Tam L Gartner J Scarth C Peiris A Gupta M Marshall D Burling S Halligan 2006 Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training Eur Radiol 16 2275 2283 16703308 10.1007/s00330-006- 0299-x (Pubitemid 44349876)
12. PJ Pickhardt 2003 Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 1599 1606 14627581
13. H Yoshida AH Dachman 2005 CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography Abdom Imaging 30 26 41 15647868 10.1007/s00261-004-0244-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FitVOjsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40169505)
14. H Yoshida J Nappi P MacEneaney DT Rubin AH Dachman 2002 Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography Radiographics 22 963 979 12110726
15. L Bogoni P Cathier M Dundar A Jerebko S Lakare J Liang S Periaswamy ME Baker M Macari 2005 Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need Br J Radiol 78 Spec No 1 S57 S62 15917447 10.1259/bjr/25777270 (Pubitemid 40932508)
16. RM Summers AK Jerebko M Franaszek JD Malley CD Johnson 2002 Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography Radiology 225 391 399 12409571 10.1148/radiol.2252011619 (Pubitemid 35239238)
17. SA Taylor S Halligan D Burling ME Roddie L Honeyfield J McQuillan H Amin J Dehmeshki 2006 Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 696 702 16498097 10.2214/AJR.04.1990 (Pubitemid 46100255)
18. JL Fidler CD Johnson RL MacCarty TJ Welch AK Hara WS Harmsen 2002 Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography Abdom Imaging 27 292 300 12173360 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vhvVGrtQ%3D%3D
19. PJ Pickhardt PA Nugent JR Choi WR Schindler 2004 Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 1343 1347 15505301
20. RG Newcombe 1998 Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data Stat Med 17 2635 2650 9839354 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981130)17:22<2635::AID-SIM954>3.0.CO;2-C 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fls1OgsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28510655)
21. JA Soto MA Barish J Yee 2005 Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough? Radiology 237 26 27 16183923 10.1148/radiol.2371050003 (Pubitemid 41346142)
22. J van Dam P Cotton CD Johnson BG McFarland BC Pineau D Provenzale D Ransohoff D Rex D Rockey FT Wootton 3rd 2004 AGA future trends report: CT colonography Gastroenterology 127 970 984 15362051 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.003 (Pubitemid 39208428)
23. RM Summers J Yao PJ Pickhardt M Franaszek I Bitter D Brickman V Krishna JR Choi 2005 Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population Gastroenterology 129 1832 1844 16344052 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.054 (Pubitemid 41772962)
24. H Yoshida AH Dachman 2004 Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography Semin Ultrasound CT MR 25 419 431 15559125 10.1053/j.sult.2004.07.002 (Pubitemid 39424005)
25. A Mani S Napel DS Paik RB Jeffrey Jr J Yee EW Olcott R Prokesch M Davila P Schraedley-Desmond CF Beaulieu 2004 Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 318 326 15100534 10.1097/00004728-200405000- 00003 (Pubitemid 38607989)
26. SA Taylor S Halligan A Slater V Goh DN Burling ME Roddie L Honeyfield J McQuillan H Amin J Dehmeshki 2006 Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software Radiology 239 759 767 16543593 10.1148/radiol.2392050483
27. G Kiss J Van Cleynenbreugel M Thomeer P Suetens G Marchal 2002 Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods Eur Radiol 12 77 81 11868078 10.1007/s003300101040 (Pubitemid 36940028)
28. FB Nicholson JL Barro CI Bartram J Dehmeshki S Halligan S Taylor MA Kamm 2005 The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening Am J Gastroenterol 100 2315 2323 16181386 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50391.x (Pubitemid 43919736)
29. D Burling S Halligan DG Altman W Atkin C Bartram H Fenlon A Laghi J Stoker S Taylor R Frost G Dessey M De Villiers J Florie S Foley L Honeyfield R Iannaccone T Gallo C Kay P Lefere A Lowe F Mangiapane J Marrannes E Neri G Nieddu D Nicholson A O'Hare S Ori B Politi M Poulus D Regge L Renaut V Rudralingham S Signoretta P Vagli V Van der Hulst J Williams-Butt 2006 CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting Eur Radiol 16 1745 1749 16636802 10.1007/s00330-006-0190-9 (Pubitemid 44027376)
30. A Oto V Gelebek BS Oguz B Sivri A Deger O Akhan A Besim 2003 CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography Eur Radiol 13 1657 1663 12835982 10.1007/s00330-002-1770-y (Pubitemid 36869360)
31. W Luboldt C Mann CL Tryon R Vonthein D Stueker M Kroll O Luz CD Claussen TJ Vogl 2002 Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast Eur Radiol 12 2236 2241 12195475
32. W Luboldt C Tryon M Kroll TL Toussaint K Holzer N Hoepffner TJ Vogl 2005 Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume Eur Radiol 15 247 253 15490178 10.1007/s00330-004-2497-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FjsVaqsQ%3D%3D