CT colonography: Investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software

Radiology

Volumn 246, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 463-471

  Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Charman, Susan C ^a   Lefere, Philippe ^b   McFarland, Elizabeth G ^c   Paulson, Erik K ^d   Yee, Judy ^e   Aslam, Rizwan ^e   Barlow, John M ^f   Gupta, Arun ^g   Kim, David H ^h   Miller, Chad M ^d   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Stedelijk Ziekenhuis Roeselare   (Belgium)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^g ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COLON POLYP; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 39549098130     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2461070190     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bogoni L, Cathier P, Dundar M, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need. Br J Radiol 2005;78(suppl 1):S57-S62.
2. Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS, et al. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:318-326.
3. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 2006;239:759-767.
4. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1832-1844.
5. Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. RadioGraphics 2002;22:963-979.
6. Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 2002;222:327-336.
7. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:696-702.
8. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2004;25:419-431.
9. Zheng B, Swensson RG, Golla S, et al. Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments. Acad Radiol 2004;11:398-406.
10. Beyer F, Zierott L, Stoeckel J, Heindel W, Wormanns D. Computer-assisted detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT: can CAD be used as a concurrent reader? [abstr]. Eur Radiol 2005;15(suppl 1):P168.
11. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1690-1699.
12. Dehmeshki J, Halligan S, Taylor SA, et al. Computer assisted detection software for CT colonography: effect of sphericity filter on performance characteristics for patients with and without fecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2007;17:662-668.
13. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9.
14. Yoshida H, Nappi J. Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1261-1274.
15. Macari M, Bini EJ. CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology 2005;237:819-833.
16. Ransohoff DF. CON: immediate colonoscopy is not necessary in patients who have polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1905-1907.
17. Rex DK. PRO: patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1903-1905.
18. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1745-1749.
19. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003;125:688-695.
20. Krupinski EA, Kallergi M. Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. Radiology 2007;242:671-682.