Spontaneous cell polarization: Feedback control of Cdc42 GTPase breaks cellular symmetry

BioEssays

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1193-1201

  Martin, Sophie G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton; Cdc42 GTPase; Feedback; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Spontaneous cell polarization; Symmetry breaking

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN CDC42; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CYTOSOL; DEPOLYMERIZATION; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOSOME; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXOCYTOSIS; INTERNALIZATION; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROTUBULE; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL POLARITY; CHEMISTRY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; TRANSPORT VESICLE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; CDC42 GTP-BINDING PROTEIN, SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CELL POLARITY; FEEDBACK; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; TRANSPORT VESICLES;

EID: 84944520438     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500077     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R. 2003. Spontaneous cell polarization: undermining determinism. Nat Cell Biol 5: 267-70.
2. Petrie RJ, Doyle AD, Yamada KM. 2009. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 538-49.
3. Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA. 1988. The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci 8: 1454-68.
4. Oda Y, Fukuda H. 2014. Emerging roles of small GTPases in secondary cell wall development. Front Plant Sci 5: 428.
5. Yang Z, Lavagi I. 2012. Spatial control of plasma membrane domains: ROP GTPase-based symmetry breaking. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15: 601-7.
6. Bulyha I, Hot E, Huntley S, Sogaard-Andersen L. 2011. GTPases in bacterial cell polarity and signalling. Curr Opin Microbiol 14: 726-33.
7. Gonzalez-Billault C, Munoz-Llancao P, Henriquez DR, Wojnacki J, et al. 2012. The role of small GTPases in neuronal morphogenesis and polarity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 69: 464-85.
8. Choy E, Chiu VK, Silletti J, Feoktistov M, et al. 1999. Endomembrane trafficking of ras: the CAAX motif targets proteins to the ER and Golgi. Cell 98: 69-80.
9. Wright LP, Philips MR. 2006. Thematic review series: lipid posttranslational modifications. CAAX modification and membrane targeting of Ras. J Lipid Res 47: 883-91.
10. DerMardirossian C, Bokoch GM. 2005. GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol 15: 356-63.
11. Rincon SA, Estravis M, Perez P. 2014. Cdc42 regulates polarized growth and cell integrity in fission yeast. Biochem Soc Trans 42: 201-5.
12. Harris KP, Tepass U. 2010. Cdc42 and vesicle trafficking in polarized cells. Traffic 11: 1272-9.
13. Melendez J, Grogg M, Zheng Y. 2011. Signaling role of Cdc42 in regulating mammalian physiology. J Biol Chem 286: 2375-81.
14. Martin SG, Arkowitz RA. 2014. Cell polarization in budding and fission yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 228-53.
15. Chen H, Kuo CC, Kang H, Howell AS, et al. 2012. Cdc42p regulation of the yeast formin Bni1p mediated by the effector Gic2p. Mol Biol Cell 23: 3814-26.
16. Dong Y, Pruyne D, Bretscher A. 2003. Formin-dependent actin assembly is regulated by distinct modes of Rho signaling in yeast. J Cell Biol 161: 1081-92.
17. Evangelista M, Blundell K, Longtine MS, Chow CJ, et al. 1997. Bni1p, a yeast formin linking cdc42p and the actin cytoskeleton during polarized morphogenesis. Science 276: 118-22.
18. Martin SG, Rincon SA, Basu R, Perez P, et al. 2007. Regulation of the formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4155-67.
19. Wu H, Turner C, Gardner J, Temple B, et al. 2010. The exo70 subunit of the exocyst is an effector for both cdc42 and rho3 function in polarized exocytosis. Mol Biol Cell 21: 430-42.
20. Zhang X, Bi E, Novick P, Du L, et al. 2001. Cdc42 interacts with the exocyst and regulates polarized secretion. J Biol Chem 276: 46745-50.
21. Zhang X, Orlando K, He B, Xi F, et al. 2008. Membrane association and functional regulation of Sec3 by phospholipids and Cdc42. J Cell Biol 180: 145-58.
22. Bendezu FO, Martin SG. 2011. Actin cables and the exocyst form two independent morphogenesis pathways in the fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 22: 44-53.
23. Turing AM. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 237: 37-72.
24. Goryachev AB, Pokhilko AV. 2008. Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing-type mechanism of yeast cell polarity. FEBS Lett 582: 1437-43.
25. Irazoqui JE, Gladfelter AS, Lew DJ. 2003. Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p. Nat Cell Biol 5: 1062-70.
26. Wedlich-Soldner R, Altschuler S, Wu L, Li R. 2003. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science 299: 1231-5.
27. Mogilner A, Allard J, Wollman R. 2012. Cell polarity: quantitative modeling as a tool in cell biology. Science 336: 175-9.
28. Butty AC, Perrinjaquet N, Petit A, Jaquenoud M, et al. 2002. A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. EMBO J 21: 1565-76.
29. Kozubowski L, Saito K, Johnson JM, Howell AS, et al. 2008. Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42 p GEF-PAK complex. Curr Biol 18: 1719-26.
30. Wedlich-Soldner R, Wai SC, Schmidt T, Li R. 2004. Robust cell polarity is a dynamic state established by coupling transport and GTPase signaling. J Cell Biol 166: 889-900.
31. Endo M, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S. 2003. The Cdc42 binding and scaffolding activities of the fission yeast adaptor protein Scd2. J Biol Chem 278: 843-52.
32. Chang EC, Barr M, Wang Y, Jung V, et al. 1994. Cooperative interaction of S. pombe proteins required for mating and morphogenesis. Cell 79: 131-41.
33. Wai SC, Gerber SA, Li R. 2009. Multisite phosphorylation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 during yeast cell polarization. PLoS ONE 4: e6563.
34. Bose I, Irazoqui JE, Moskow JJ, Bardes ES, et al. 2001. Assembly of scaffold-mediated complexes containing Cdc42p, the exchange factor Cdc24p, and the effector Cla4p required for cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of Cdc24p. J Biol Chem 276: 7176-86.
35. Gulli MP, Jaquenoud M, Shimada Y, Niederhauser G, et al. 2000. Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. Mol Cell 6: 1155-67.
36. Kuo CC, Savage NS, Chen H, Wu CF, et al. 2014. Inhibitory GEF phosphorylation provides negative feedback in the yeast polarity circuit. Curr Biol 24: 753-9.
37. France YE, Boyd C, Coleman J, Novick PJ. 2006. The polarity-establishment component Bem1p interacts with the exocyst complex through the Sec15p subunit. J Cell Sci 119: 876-88.
38. Liu D, Novick P. 2014. Bem1p contributes to secretory pathway polarization through a direct interaction with Exo70p. J Cell Biol 207: 59-72.
39. Bähler J, Peter M. 2000. Cell polarity in yeast. In Drubin D, ed; Cell Polarity. Oxford University Press. p. 21-77.
40. Park HO, Bi E. 2007. Central roles of small GTPases in the development of cell polarity in yeast and beyond. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 48-96.
41. Chant J, Herskowitz I. 1991. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65: 1203-12.
42. Bi E, Park HO. 2012. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics 191: 347-87.
43. Smith SE, Rubinstein B, Mendes Pinto I, Slaughter BD, et al. 2013. Independence of symmetry breaking on Bem1-mediated autocatalytic activation of Cdc42. J Cell Biol 202: 1091-106.
44. Shimada Y, Wiget P, Gulli MP, Bi E, et al. 2004. The nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24p may be regulated by auto-inhibition. EMBO J 23: 1051-62.
45. Park HO, Bi E, Pringle JR, Herskowitz I. 1997. Two active states of the Ras-related Bud1/Rsr1 protein bind to different effectors to determine yeast cell polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4463-8.
46. Zheng Y, Bender A, Cerione RA. 1995. Interactions among proteins involved in bud-site selection and bud-site assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 270: 626-30.
47. Li R, Wedlich-Soldner R. 2009. Bem1 complexes and the complexity of yeast cell polarization. Curr Biol 19: R194-5.
48. Kozminski KG, Beven L, Angerman E, Tong AH, et al. 2003. Interaction between a Ras and a Rho GTPase couples selection of a growth site to the development of cell polarity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 14: 4958-70.
49. Kang PJ, Beven L, Hariharan S, Park HO. 2010. The Rsr1/Bud1 GTPase interacts with itself and the Cdc42 GTPase during bud-site selection and polarity establishment in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 21: 3007-16.
50. Kelly FD, Nurse P. 2011. De novo growth zone formation from fission yeast spheroplasts. PLoS ONE 6: e27977.
51. Kelly FD, Nurse P. 2011. Spatial control of Cdc42 activation determines cell width in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 22: 3801-11.
52. Das M, Wiley DJ, Chen X, Shah K, et al. 2009. The conserved NDR kinase Orb6 controls polarized cell growth by spatial regulation of the small GTPase Cdc42. Curr Biol 19: 1314-9.
53. Kokkoris K, Castro DG, Martin SG. 2014. Tea4-phosphatase I landmark promotes local growth by dual Cdc42 GEF recruitment and GAP exclusion. J Cell Sci 127: 2005-16.
54. Vjestica A, Zhang D, Liu J, Oliferenko S. 2013. Hsp70-Hsp40 chaperone complex functions in controlling polarized growth by repressing Hsf1-driven heat stress-associated transcription. PLoS Genet 9: e1003886.
55. Coll PM, Trillo Y, Ametzazurra A, Perez P. 2003. Gef1p, a new guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42p, regulates polarity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 14: 313-23.
56. Hirota K, Tanaka K, Ohta K, Yamamoto M. 2003. Gef1p and Scd1p, the two GDP-GTP exchange factors for Cdc42p, form a ring structure that shrinks during cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 14: 3617-27.
57. Kang PJ, Lee ME, Park HO. 2014. Bud3 activates Cdc42 to establish a proper growth site in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 206: 19-28.
58. Lee ME, Lo WC, Miller KE, Chou CS, et al. 2015. Regulation of Cdc42 polarization by the Rsr1 GTPase and Rga1, a Cdc42 GTPase activating protein, in budding yeast. J Cell Sci 128: 2106-17.
59. Caviston JP, Tcheperegine SE, Bi E. 2002. Singularity in budding: a role for the evolutionarily conserved small GTPase Cdc42p. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12185-90.
60. Bendezu FO, Vincenzetti V, Vavylonis D, Wyss R, et al. 2015. Spontaneous Cdc42 polarization independent of GDI-mediated extraction and actin-based trafficking. PLoS Biol 13: e1002097.
61. Freisinger T, Klunder B, Johnson J, Muller N, et al. 2013. Establishment of a robust single axis of cell polarity by coupling multiple positive feedback loops. Nat Commun 4: 1807.
62. Tiedje C, Sakwa I, Just U, Hofken T. 2008. The Rho GDI Rdi1 regulates Rho GTPases by distinct mechanisms. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2885-96.
63. Nakano K, Mutoh T, Arai R, Mabuchi I. 2003. The small GTPase Rho4 is involved in controlling cell morphology and septation in fission yeast. Genes Cells 8: 357-70.
64. Slaughter BD, Das A, Schwartz JW, Rubinstein B, et al. 2009. Dual modes of cdc42 recycling fine-tune polarized morphogenesis. Dev Cell 17: 823-35.
65. Orlando K, Sun X, Zhang J, Lu T, et al. 2011. Exo-endocytic trafficking and the septin-based diffusion barrier are required for the maintenance of Cdc42p polarization during budding yeast asymmetric growth. Mol Biol Cell 22: 624-33.
66. Howell AS, Savage NS, Johnson SA, Bose I, et al. 2009. Singularity in polarization: rewiring yeast cells to make two buds. Cell 139: 731-43.
67. Savage NS, Layton AT, Lew DJ. 2012. Mechanistic mathematical model of polarity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 23: 1998-2013.
68. Layton AT, Savage NS, Howell AS, Carroll SY, et al. 2011. Modeling vesicle traffic reveals unexpected consequences for Cdc42p-mediated polarity establishment. Curr Biol 21: 184-94.
69. Watson LJ, Rossi G, Brennwald P. 2014. Quantitative analysis of membrane trafficking in regulation of Cdc42 polarity. Traffic 15: 1330-43.
70. Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Das A, Smith SE, et al. 2013. Non-uniform membrane diffusion enables steady-state cell polarization via vesicular trafficking. Nat Commun 4: 1380.
71. Valdez-Taubas J, Pelham HR. 2003. Slow diffusion of proteins in the yeast plasma membrane allows polarity to be maintained by endocytic cycling. Curr Biol 13: 1636-40.
72. Marco E, Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R, Altschuler SJ, et al. 2007. Endocytosis optimizes the dynamic localization of membrane proteins that regulate cortical polarity. Cell 129: 411-22.
73. Howell AS, Jin M, Wu CF, Zyla TR, et al. 2012. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149: 322-33.
74. Fairn GD, Hermansson M, Somerharju P, Grinstein S. 2011. Phosphatidylserine is polarized and required for proper Cdc42 localization and for development of cell polarity. Nat Cell Biol 13: 1424-30.
75. Das A, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Bradford WD, et al. 2012. Flippase-mediated phospholipid asymmetry promotes fast Cdc42 recycling in dynamic maintenance of cell polarity. Nat Cell Biol 14: 304-10.
76. Okada S, Leda M, Hanna J, Savage NS, et al. 2013. Daughter cell identity emerges from the interplay of Cdc42, septins, and exocytosis. Dev Cell 26: 148-61.
77. Dyer JM, Savage NS, Jin M, Zyla TR, et al. 2013. Tracking shallow chemical gradients by actin-driven wandering of the polarization site. Curr Biol 23: 32-41.
78. Irazoqui JE, Howell AS, Theesfeld CL, Lew DJ. 2005. Opposing roles for actin in Cdc42p polarization. Mol Biol Cell 16: 1296-304.
79. Qin Y, Yang Z. 2011. Rapid tip growth: insights from pollen tubes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22: 816-24.
80. Wu CF, Lew DJ. 2013. Beyond symmetry-breaking: competition and negative feedback in GTPase regulation. Trends Cell Biol 23: 476-83.
81. Bendezu FO, Martin SG. 2012. Cdc42 oscillations in yeasts. Sci Signal 5: pe53.
82. Altschuler SJ, Angenent SB, Wang Y, Wu LF. 2008. On the spontaneous emergence of cell polarity. Nature 454: 886-9.
83. Das M, Drake T, Wiley DJ, Buchwald P, et al. 2012. Oscillatory dynamics of Cdc42 GTPase in the control of polarized growth. Science 337: 239-43.
84. Ozbudak EM, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A. 2005. A system of counteracting feedback loops regulates Cdc42p activity during spontaneous cell polarization. Dev Cell 9: 565-71.
85. Bendezu FO, Martin SG. 2013. Cdc42 explores the cell periphery for mate selection in fission yeast. Curr Biol 23: 42-7.
86. Bonazzi D, Julien JD, Romao M, Seddiki R, et al. 2014. Symmetry breaking in spore germination relies on an interplay between polar cap stability and spore wall mechanics. Dev Cell 28: 534-46.
87. Wu CF, Savage NS, Lew DJ. 2013. Interaction between bud-site selection and polarity-establishment machineries in budding yeast. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368: 20130006.
88. Klunder B, Freisinger T, Wedlich-Soldner R, Frey E. 2013. GDI-mediated cell polarization in yeast provides precise spatial and temporal control of Cdc42 signaling. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003396.
89. Das M, Wiley DJ, Medina S, Vincent HA, et al. 2007. Regulation of cell diameter, For3p localization, and cell symmetry by fission yeast Rho-GAP Rga4p. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2090-101.
90. Tatebe H, Nakano K, Maximo R, Shiozaki K. 2008. Pom1 DYRK regulates localization of the Rga4 GAP to ensure bipolar activation of Cdc42 in fission yeast. Curr Biol 18: 322-30.
91. Tong Z, Gao XD, Howell AS, Bose I, et al. 2007. Adjacent positioning of cellular structures enabled by a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein-mediated zone of inhibition. J Cell Biol 179: 1375-84.
92. Knaus M, Pelli-Gulli MP, van Drogen F, Springer S, et al. 2007. Phosphorylation of Bem2p and Bem3p may contribute to local activation of Cdc42p at bud emergence. EMBO J 26: 4501-13.
93. Feierbach B, Chang F. 2001. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr Biol 11: 1656-65.
94. Rupes I, Jia Z, Young PG. 1999. Ssp1 promotes actin depolymerization and is involved in stress response and new end take-off control in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10: 1495-510.
95. Martin SG, Chang F. 2005. New end take off: regulating cell polarity during the fission yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 4: 1046-9.
96. Martin SG, McDonald WH, Yates JR, 3rd, Chang F. 2005. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity. Dev Cell 8: 479-91.
97. Mata J, Nurse P. 1997. tea1 and the microtubular cytoskeleton are important for generating global spatial order within the fission yeast cell. Cell 89: 939-49.
98. Tatebe H, Shimada K, Uzawa S, Morigasaki S, et al. 2005. Wsh3/Tea4 is a novel cell-end factor essential for bipolar distribution of Tea1 and protects cell polarity under environmental stress in S. pombe. Curr Biol 15: 1006-15.
99. Minc N, Bratman SV, Basu R, Chang F. 2009. Establishing new sites of polarization by microtubules. Curr Biol 19: 83-94.
100. Terenna CR, Makushok T, Velve-Casquillas G, Baigl D, et al. 2008. Physical mechanisms redirecting cell polarity and cell shape in fission yeast. Curr Biol 18: 1748-53.