Independence of symmetry breaking on Bem1-mediated autocatalytic activation of Cdc42

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 202, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1091-1106

  Smith, Sarah E ^a,b   Rubinstein, Boris ^a   Pinto, Inês Mendes ^a   Slaughter, Brian D ^a   Unruh, Jay R ^a   Li, Rong ^a,b  

^a STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTOR PROTEIN; BEM1 PROTEIN; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE DISSOCIATION INHIBITOR; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; PROTEIN CDC42; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION;

ACTINS; ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CDC42 GTP-BINDING PROTEIN, SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL POLARITY; CYTOPLASM; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE DISSOCIATION INHIBITORS; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTORS; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84886903385     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201304180     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Altschuler, S.J., S.B. Angenent, Y. Wang, and L.F. Wu. 2008. On the spontaneous emergence of cell polarity. Nature. 454:886-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07119
2. Ayscough, K.R., J. Stryker, N. Pokala, M. Sanders, P. Crews, and D.G. Drubin. 1997. High rates of actin filament turnover in budding yeast and roles for actin in establishment and maintenance of cell polarity revealed using the actin inhibitor latrunculin-A. J. Cell Biol. 137:399-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.137.2.399
3. Bender, L., H.S. Lo, H. Lee, V. Kokojan, V. Peterson, and A. Bender. 1996. Associations among PH and SH3 domain-containing proteins and Rho-type GTPases in Yeast. J. Cell Biol. 133:879-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.4.879
4. Bose, I., J.E. Irazoqui, J.J. Moskow, E.S.G. Bardes, T.R. Zyla, and D.J. Lew. 2001. Assembly of scaffold-mediated complexes containing Cdc42p, the exchange factor Cdc24p, and the effector Cla4p required for cell cycleregulated phosphorylation of Cdc24p. J. Biol. Chem. 276:7176-7186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M010546200
5. Burke, D., D. Dawson, and T. Stearns. 2000. Methods in Yeast Genetics: a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY. 205 pp.
6. Butty, A.-C., N. Perrinjaquet, A. Petit, M. Jaquenoud, J.E. Segall, K. Hofmann, C. Zwahlen, and M. Peter. 2002. A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. EMBO J. 21:1565-1576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.7.1565
7. Casamayor, A., and M. Snyder. 2002. Bud-site selection and cell polarity in budding yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00300-4
8. Das, A., B.D. Slaughter, J.R. Unruh, W.D. Bradford, R. Alexander, B. Rubinstein, and R. Li. 2012. Flippase-mediated phospholipid asymmetry promotes fast Cdc42 recycling in dynamic maintenance of cell polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:304-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2444
9. DerMardirossian, C., and G.M. Bokoch. 2005. GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol. 15:356-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.05.001
10. Etienne-Manneville, S. 2004. Cdc42-the centre of polarity. J. Cell Sci. 117: 1291-1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01115
11. Freisinger, T., B. Klünder, J. Johnson, N. Müller, G. Pichler, G. Beck, M. Costanzo, C. Boone, R.A. Cerione, E. Frey, and R. Wedlich-Söldner. 2013. Establishment of a robust single axis of cell polarity by coupling multiple positive feedback loops. Nat. Commun. 4:1807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2795
12. Fujita, A., M. Lord, T. Hiroko, F. Hiroko, T. Chen, C. Oka, Y. Misumi, and J. Chant. 2004. Rax1, a protein required for the establishment of the bipolar budding pattern in yeast. Gene. 327:161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2003.11.021
13. Gao, X.-D., L.M. Sperber, S.A. Kane, Z. Tong, A.H.Y. Tong, C. Boone, and E. Bi. 2007. Sequential and distinct roles of the cadherin domain-containing protein Axl2p in cell polarization in yeast cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:2542-2560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E06-09-0822
14. Goehring, N.W., P.K. Trong, J.S. Bois, D. Chowdhury, E.M. Nicola, A.A. Hyman, and S.W. Grill. 2011. Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science. 334:1137-1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1208619
15. Goryachev, A.B., and A.V. Pokhilko. 2006. Computational model explains high activity and rapid cycling of Rho GTPases within protein complexes. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2:e172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020172
16. Goryachev, A.B., and A.V. Pokhilko. 2008. Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing-type mechanism of yeast cell polarity. FEBS Lett. 582:1437-1443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.029
17. Gulli, M.-P., M. Jaquenoud, Y. Shimada, G. Niederhäuser, P. Wiget, and M. Peter. 2000. Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. Mol. Cell. 6:1155-1167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00113-1
18. Hodgson, L., O. Pertz, and K.M. Hahn. 2008. Design and optimization of genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors: GTPase biosensors. Methods Cell Biol. 85:63-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)85004-2
19. Howell, A.S., N.S. Savage, S.A. Johnson, I. Bose, A.W. Wagner, T.R. Zyla, H.F. Nijhout, M.C. Reed, A.B. Goryachev, and D.J. Lew. 2009. Singularity in polarization: rewiring yeast cells to make two buds. Cell. 139:731-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.024
20. Howell, A.S., M. Jin, C.F. Wu, T.R. Zyla, T.C. Elston, and D.J. Lew. 2012. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell. 149:322-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012
21. Irazoqui, J.E., A.S. Gladfelter, and D.J. Lew. 2003. Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:1062-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1068
22. Ito, H., Y. Fukuda, K. Murata, and A. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153:163-168.
23. Ito, T., Y. Matsui, T. Ago, K. Ota, and H. Sumimoto. 2001. Novel modular domain PB1 recognizes PC motif to mediate functional protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 20:3938-3946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.15.3938
24. Itoh, R.E., K. Kurokawa, Y. Ohba, H. Yoshizaki, N. Mochizuki, and M. Matsuda. 2002. Activation of rac and cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6582-6591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.18.6582-6591.2002
25. Jose, M., S. Tollis, D. Nair, J.-B. Sibarita, and D. McCusker. 2013. Robust polarity establishment occurs via an endocytosis-based cortical corralling mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 200:407-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201206081
26. Kang, P.J., L. Béven, S. Hariharan, and H.-O. Park. 2010. The Rsr1/Bud1 GTPase interacts with itself and the Cdc42 GTPase during bud-site selection and polarity establishment in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:3007-3016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E10-03-0232
27. Koch, G., K. Tanaka, T. Masuda, W. Yamochi, H. Nonaka, and Y. Takai. 1997. Association of the Rho family small GTP-binding proteins with Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (Rho GDI) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Oncogene. 15:417-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1201194
28. Kozminski, K.G., L. Beven, E. Angerman, A.H.Y. Tong, C. Boone, and H.-O. Park. 2003. Interaction between a Ras and a Rho GTPase couples selection of a growth site to the development of cell polarity in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:4958-4970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E03-06-0426
29. Kozubowski, L., K. Saito, J.M. Johnson, A.S. Howell, T.R. Zyla, and D.J. Lew. 2008. Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex. Curr. Biol. 18:1719-1726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.060
30. Ku, C.-J., Y. Wang, O.D. Weiner, S.J. Altschuler, and L.F. Wu. 2012. Network crosstalk dynamically changes during neutrophil polarization. Cell. 149:1073-1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.044
31. Larson, S.M., and A.R. Davidson. 2000. The identification of conserved interactions within the SH3 domain by alignment of sequences and structures. Protein Sci. 9:2170-2180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.9.11.2170
32. Li, C.H., and P.K.S. Tam. 1998. An iterative algorithm for minimum cross entropy thresholding. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 18:771-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(98)00057-9
33. Li, R., and G.G. Gundersen. 2008. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:860-873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2522
34. Marco, E., R. Wedlich-Soldner, R. Li, S.J. Altschuler, and L.F. Wu. 2007. Endocytosis optimizes the dynamic localization of membrane proteins that regulate cortical polarity. Cell. 129:411-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.043
35. McCaffrey, L.M., and I.G. Macara. 2009. Widely conserved signaling pathways in the establishment of cell polarity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1:a001370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001370
36. Mori, Y., A. Jilkine, and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 2011. Asymptotic and bifurcation analysis of wave-pinning in a reaction-diffusion model for cell plarization. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71:1401-1427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/10079118X
37. Onsum, M.D., and C.V. Rao. 2009. Calling heads from tails: the role of mathematical modeling in understanding cell polarization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:74-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.001
38. Otsuji, M., S. Ishihara, C. Co, K. Kaibuchi, A. Mochizuki, and S. Kuroda. 2007. A mass conserved reaction-diffusion system captures properties of cell polarity. PLOS Comput. Biol. 3:e108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030108
39. Ozbudak, E.M., A. Becskei, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2005. A system of counteracting feedback loops regulates Cdc42p activity during spontaneous cell polarization. Dev. Cell. 9:565-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.08.014
40. Park, H.-O., and E. Bi. 2007. Central roles of small GTPases in the development of cell polarity in yeast and beyond. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:48-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00028-06
41. Park, H.-O., E. Bi, J.R. Pringle, and I. Herskowitz. 1997. Two active states of the Ras-related Bud1/Rsr1 protein bind to different effectors to determine yeast cell polarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:4463-4468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.9.4463
42. Park, H.-O., P.J. Kang, and A.W. Rachfal. 2002. Localization of the Rsr1/Bud1 GTPase involved in selection of a proper growth site in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 277:26721-26724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. C200245200
43. Peterson, J., Y. Zheng, L. Bender, A. Myers, R. Cerione, and A. Bender. 1994. Interactions between the bud emergence proteins Bem1p and Bem2p and Rho-type GTPases in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 127:1395-1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.5.1395
44. Roemer, T., K. Madden, J. Chang, and M. Snyder. 1996. Selection of axial growth sites in yeast requires Axl2p, a novel plasma membrane glycoprotein. Genes Dev. 10:777-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.7.777
45. Rubinstein, B., B.D. Slaughter, and R. Li. 2012. Weakly nonlinear analysis of symmetry breaking in cell polarity models. Phys. Biol. 9:045006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/9/4/045006
46. Sanders, S.L., M. Gentzsch, W. Tanner, and I. Herskowitz. 1999. O-Glycosylation of Axl2/Bud10p by Pmt4p is required for its stability, localization, and function in daughter cells. J. Cell Biol. 145:1177-1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.145.6.1177
47. Savage, N.S., A.T. Layton, and D.J. Lew. 2012. Mechanistic mathematical model of polarity in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 23:1998-2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E11-10-0837
48. Seetapun, D., and D.J. Odde. 2010. Cell-length-dependent microtubule accumulation during polarization. Curr. Biol. 20:979-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.040
49. Shimada, Y., P. Wiget, M.-P. Gulli, E. Bi, and M. Peter. 2004. The nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24p may be regulated by auto-inhibition. EMBO J. 23:1051-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600124
50. Slaughter, B.D., A. Das, J.W. Schwartz, B. Rubinstein, and R. Li. 2009. Dual modes of cdc42 recycling fine-tune polarized morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 17:823-835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.10.022
51. Slaughter, B.D., J.R. Unruh, A. Das, S.E. Smith, B. Rubinstein, and R. Li. 2013. Non-uniform membrane diffusion enables steady-state cell polarization via vesicular trafficking. Nat Commun. 4:1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2370
52. Tiedje, C., I. Sakwa, U. Just, and T. Höfken. 2008. The Rho GDI Rdi1 regulates Rho GTPases by distinct mechanisms. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:2885-2896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E07-11-1152
53. van Drogen-Petit, A., C. Zwahlen, M. Peter, and A.M.J.J. Bonvin. 2004. Insight into molecular interactions between two PB1 domains. J. Mol. Biol. 336:1195-1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.062
54. Wai, S.C., S.A. Gerber, and R. Li. 2009. Multisite phosphorylation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 during yeast cell polarization. PLoS ONE. 4:e6563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006563
55. Wedlich-Soldner, R., S. Altschuler, L. Wu, and R. Li. 2003. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science. 299:1231-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1080944
56. Wedlich-Soldner, R., S.C. Wai, T. Schmidt, and R. Li. 2004. Robust cell polarity is a dynamic state established by coupling transport and GTPase signaling. J. Cell Biol. 166:889-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200405061
57. Yamaguchi, Y., K. Ota, and T. Ito. 2007. A novel Cdc42-interacting domain of the yeast polarity establishment protein Bem1. Implications for modulation of mating pheromone signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 282:29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M609308200
58. Zheng, Y., A. Bender, and R.A. Cerione. 1995. Interactions among proteins involved in bud-site selection and bud-site assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 270:626-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.2.626