Oscillatory dynamics of Cdc42 GTPase in the control of polarized growth

Science

Volumn 337, Issue 6091, 2012, Pages 239-243

  Das, Maitreyi ^a   Drake, Tyler ^b   Wiley, David J ^a   Buchwald, Peter ^a   Vavylonis, Dimitrios ^b   Verde, Fulvia ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; P21 ACTIVATED KINASE 1; PROTEIN CDC42; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

CELL ORGANELLE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FLUORESCENCE; GROWTH RATE; MEMBRANE; MORPHOLOGY; POLARIZATION; PROTEIN; SELF ORGANIZATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; YEAST;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL ELONGATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CYTOPLASM; DEPOLYMERIZATION; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE MUTATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NOISE; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; POINT MUTATION; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST CELL;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 84863778973     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1218377     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S. J. Heasman, A. J. Ridley, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 690 (2008).
2. P. Perez, S. A. Rincón, Biochem. J. 426, 243 (2010).
3. J. E. Irazoqui, A. S. Gladfelter, D. J. Lew, Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 1062 (2003).
4. R. Wedlich-Soldner, S. C. Wai, T. Schmidt, R. Li, J. Cell Biol. 166, 889 (2004).
5. L. Kozubowski et al., Curr. Biol. 18, 1719 (2008).
6. B. D. Slaughter, A. Das, J. W. Schwartz, B. Rubinstein, R. Li, Dev. Cell 17, 823 (2009).
7. J. M. Mitchison, P. Nurse, J. Cell Sci. 75, 357 (1985).
8. H. Tatebe, K. Nakano, R. Maximo, K. Shiozaki, Curr. Biol. 18, 322 (2008).
9. M. Endo, M. Shirouzu, S. Yokoyama, J. Biol. Chem. 278, 843 (2003).
10. E. Wheatley, K. Rittinger, Biochem. J. 388, 177 (2005).
11. h]g}. Here, ε determines the delayed dissociation strength, τ is delay time, and h gives the nonlinearity of the effect.
12. Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
13. A. Csikász-Nagy, B. Gyorffy, W. Alt, J. J. Tyson, B. Novák, Yeast 25, 59 (2008).
14. A. S. Howell et al., Cell 139, 731 (2009).
15. H. Meinhardt, P. A. de Boer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14202 (2001).
16. P. M. Coll, Y. Trillo, A. Ametzazurra, P. Perez, Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 313 (2003).
17. P. Fantes, Nature 279, 428 (1979).
18. S. G. Martin, S. A. Rincón, R. Basu, P. Pérez, F. Chang, Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4155 (2007).
19. E. C. Chang et al., Cell 79, 131 (1994).
20. E. Chang et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8066 (1999).
21. F. D. Kelly, P. Nurse, Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3801 (2011).
22. E. M. Ozbudak, A. Becskei, A. van Oudenaarden, Dev. Cell 9, 565 (2005).
23. F. Verde, D. J. Wiley, P. Nurse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 7526 (1998).
24. J. Mata, P. Nurse, Cell 89, 939 (1997).
25. M. Das et al., Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2090 (2007).
26. I. Rupes, Z. Jia, P. G. Young, Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1495 (1999).
27. S. Marcus et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6180 (1995).
28. S. Ottilie et al., EMBO J. 14, 5908 (1995).
29. M. P. Gulli et al., Mol. Cell 6, 1155 (2000).
30. E. Karsenti, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 255 (2008).