Quantitative genetic variance in experimental fly populations evolving with or without environmental heterogeneity

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2735-2746

  Huang, Yuheng ^a   Stinchcombe, John R ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conditional neutrality; Drosophila melanogaster; Environmental antagonism; Maintenance of genetic variance; Spatial and temporal heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROGENEITY; POLYMORPHISM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

CADMIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL; BODY WEIGHT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DRUG EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; INSECT GENOME; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY WEIGHT; CADMIUM; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, INSECT; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 84944128277     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12771     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Baldwin-Brown, J. G., A. D. Long, and K. R. Thornton. 2014. The power to detect quantitative trait loci using resequenced, experimentally evolved populations of diploid, sexual organisms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31:1040-1055.
2. Bangham, J. 2002. Effects of body size, accessory gland and testis size on pre- and postcopulatory success in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 64:915-921.
3. Barton, N. H. 2000. Genetic hitchhiking. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 355:1553-1562.
4. Beardmore, J. A. 1961. Diurnal temperature fluctuation and genetic variance in Drosophila populations. Nature 189:162-163.
5. Bergland, A. O., L. B. Emily, K. R. O'Brien, P. S. Schmidt, and D. A. Petrov. 2014. Genomic evidence of rapid and stable adaptive oscillations over seasonal time scale in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 10:e1004775.
6. Bonduriansky, R., M. A. Mallet, D. Arbuthnott, V. Pawlowsky-Glahn, J. J. Egozcue, and H. D. Rundle. 2015. Differential effects of genetic vs. environmental quality in Drosophila melanogaster suggest multiple forms of condition dependence. Evol. Lett. 18:317-326.
7. Burger, R., and A. Gimelfarb. 2002. Fluctuating environments and the role of mutation in maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Genet. Res. 80:31-46.
8. Byrne, P. G., and W. R. Rice. 2006. Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 273:917-922.
9. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes. 2000. The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits. Pp. 369-391 in R. S. Singh, and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Charlesworth, D. 2006. Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genet 2:e64.
11. Condon, C., B. S. Cooper, S. Yeaman, and M. J. Angilletta, Jr. 2014. Temporal variation favors the evolution of generalists in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 68:720-728.
12. Dempster, E. R. 1955. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:25-32.
13. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Essex, England.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1976. The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Annu. Rev. Genet. 10:253-280.
15. Fournier-Level, A., A. Korte, M. D. Cooper, M. Nordborg, J. Schmitt, and A. M. Wilczek. 2011. A map of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 334:86-89.
16. Friberg, U., and G. Arnqvist. 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice- preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16:797-811.
17. Fry, J. D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are trade-offs overrated? Am. Nat. 148:S84-S107.
18. Garcia-Dorado, A., P. Martin, and N. Garcia. 1991. Soft selection and quantitative genetic variation: a laboratory experiment. Heredity 66:313-323.
19. Garcia-Gonzalez, F., L. W. Simmons, J. L. Tomkins, J. S. Kotiaho, and J. P. Evans. 2012. Comparing evolvabilities: common errors surrounding the calculation and use of coefficients of additive genetic variation. Evolution 66:2341-2349.
20. Gillespie, J. H. 1997. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene 205:291-299.
21. Hadfield, J. D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R Package. J. Stat. Softw. 33:1-22.
22. Haley, C. S., and A. J. Birley. 1983. The genetical response to natural selection by varied environments. II. Observations on replicate populations in spatially varied laboratory environments. Heredity 51:581-606.
23. Hansen, T. F., C. Pélabon, and D. Houle. 2011. Heritability is not evolvability. Evol. Biol. 38:258-277.
24. Hoffmann, A. A., and J. Merila. 1999. Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:96-101.
25. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
26. Houle, D., C. Pélabon, G. P. Wagner, and T. F. Hansen. 2011. Measurement and meaning in biology. Quart. Rev. Biol. 86:3-34.
27. Huang, Y., S. I. Wright, and A. F. Agrawal. 2014. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation within and among alternative selective regimes. PLoS Genet 10:e1004527.
28. Hudson, R. R., and N. L. Kaplan. 1988. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics 120:831-840.
29. Johnson, T., and N. Barton. 2005. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360:1411-1425.
30. Jones, F. C., M. G. Grabherr, Y. F. Chan, P. Russell, E. Mauceli, J. Johnson, R. Swofford, M. Pirun, M. C. Zody, S. White, et al. 2012. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484:55-61.
31. Kassen, R. 2002. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 15:173-190.
32. Kawecki, T. J. 1994. Accumulation of deleterious mutations and the evolutionary cost of being a generalist. Am. Nat. 144:833-838.
33. Kawecki, T. J., R. E. Lenski, D. Ebert, B. Hollis, I. Olivieri, and M. C. Whitlock. 2012. Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:547-560.
34. Ketola, T., V. M. Kellermann, Volker Loeschcke, A. López-Sepulcre, and T. N. Kristensen. 2014. Does environmental robustness play a role in fluctuating environments? Evolution 68:587-594.
35. Kofler, R., and C. Schlötterer. 2014. A guide for the design of evolve and resequencing studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31:474-483.
36. Langley, C. H., K. Stevens, C. Cardeno, Y. C. G. Lee, D. R. Schrider, J. E. Pool, S. A. Langley, C. Suarez, R. B. Corbett-Detig, B. Kolaczkowski, et al. 2012. Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192:533-598.
37. Leffler, E. M., K. Bullaughey, D. R. Matute, W. K. Meyer, L. Ségurel, A. Venkat, P. Andolfatto, and M. Przeworski. 2012. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species? PLoS Biol 10:e1001388.
38. Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one niche is available. Am. Nat. 87:331-333.
39. Long, T. 1970. Genetic effects of fluctuating temperature in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 66:401-416.
40. Long, T. A. F., L. Rowe, and A. F. Agrawal. 2013. The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 181:532-544.
41. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1997. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland, MA.
42. Mackay, T. F. C. 1981. Genetic variation in varying environments. Genet. Res. 37:79-93.
43. McDonald, J. F., and F. J. Ayala. 1974. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature 250:572-574.
44. Mitchell-Olds, T., J. H. Willis, and D. B. Goldstein. 2007. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:845-856.
45. Pitnick, S., and F. Garcia-Gonzalez. 2002. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B Biological Sciences 269:1821-1828.
46. Powell, J. R., and H. Wistrand. 1978. The effect of heterogeneous environments and a competitor on genetic variation in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 112:935-947.
47. Prasad, N. G., S. Bedhomme, T. Day, and A. K. Chippindale. 2007. An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution. Am. Nat. 169:29-37.
48. Quinn, G. P., and M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologist. Pp. 196-198. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
49. Riddle, R. A., P. S. Dawson, and D. F. Zirkle. 1986. An experimental test of the relationship between genetic variation and environmental variation in tribolium flour beetles. Genetics 113:391-404.
50. Robertson, A. 1959. Experimental design in the evaluation of genetic parameters. Biometrics 15:219-226.
51. Savolainen, O., M. Lascoux, and J. Merilä. 2013. Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:807-820.
52. Schmidt, P. S., and D. R. Conde. 2006. Environmental heterogeneity and the maintenance of genetic variation for reproductive diapause in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60:1602-1611.
53. Sharp, N. P., and A. F. Agrawal. 2012. Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:6142-6146.
54. Siepielski, A. M., K. M. Gotanda, M. B. Morrissey, S. E. Diamond, J. D. DiBattista, and S. M. Carlson. 2013. The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection. Ecol. Lett. 16:1382-1392.
55. Spichtig, M., and T. J. Kawecki. 2004. The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 164:70-84.
56. Stinchcombe, J. R., and H. E. Hoekstra. 2007. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity 100:158-170.
57. Taylor, J. E. 2013. Theoretical population biology. Theor. Popul. Biol. 87:34-50.
58. Turelli, M., and N. H. Barton. 2004. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection- pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G × E interactions. Genetics 166:1053-1079.
59. Venail, P. A., O. Kaltz, I. Olivieri, T. Pommier, and N. Mouquet. 2011. Diversification in temporally heterogeneous environments: effect of the grain in experimental bacterial populations. J. Evol. Biol. 24:2485-2495.
60. Verdonck, M. V. 1987. Adaptation to environmental heterogeneity in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 49:1-10.
61. Wagner, G. P., G. Booth, and H. Bagheri-Chaichian. 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51:329-347.
62. Wallace, B. 1975. Hard and soft selection revisited. Evolution 29:465-473.
63. Whitlock, M. C. 1996. The red queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am. Nat. 148:S65-S77.
64. Yeaman, S., Y. Chen, and M. C. Whitlock. 2010. No effect of environmental heterogeneity on the maintenance of genetic variation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 64:3398-3408.