The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection

Ecology Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1382-1392

  Siepielski, Adam M ^a   Gotanda, Kiyoko M ^b   Morrissey, Michael B ^c   Diamond, Sarah E ^d   Dibattista, Joseph D ^e   Carlson, Stephanie M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Environmental variation; Evolution; Local adaptation; Natural selection; Selection mosaic; Sexual selection; Spatial variation

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; REVIEW; SELECTION MOSAIC; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ADAPTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION; EVOLUTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; SELECTION MOSAIC; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84885959113     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12174     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Arnqvist, G. (1992). Spatial variation in selective regimes: sexual selection in the water strider Gerris odontogaster. Evolution, 46, 914-929.
2. Bell, G. (2008). Selection: the Mechanism of Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
3. Bell, G. (2010). Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 365, 87-97.
4. Benkman, C.W., Holimon, W.C. & Smith, J.W. (2001). The influence of a competitor on the geographic mosaic of coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Evolution, 55, 282-294.
5. Benkman, C.W., Parchman, T.L. & Mezquida, E.T. (2010). Patterns of coevolution in the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1206, 1-16.
6. Bulmer, M.G. (1972). The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation and drift. Genet. Res., 19, 17.
7. Bulmer, M.G. (1974). Linkage disequilibrium and genetic variability. Genet. Res, 23, 281-289.
8. Cain, A.J. & Sheppard, P.M. (1952). The effects of natural selection on body colour in the land snail Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity, 6, 217-231.
9. Chevin, L.-M. (2013). Genetic constraints on adaptation to a changing environment. Evolution, 67, 708-721.
10. Clarke, B. (1972). Density-dependent selection. Am. Nat., 106, 1-13.
11. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. J. Murray, London.
12. Eldredge, N., et al. (2005). The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology, 31, 133-145.
13. Endler, J.A. (1977). Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
14. Endler, J.A. (1980). Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution, 34, 76-91.
15. Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
16. Felsenstein, J. (1976). The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Annu. Rev. Genet., 10, 253-280.
17. Garant, D., Kruuk, L.E.B., McCleery, R.H. & Sheldon, B.C. (2007). The effects of environmental heterogeneity on multivariate selection on reproductive traits in female great tits. Evolution, 61, 1546-1559.
18. Gillespie, J.H. (1974). Natural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number. Genetics, 76, 601-606.
19. Gosden, T.P. & Svensson, E.I. (2008). Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution, 62, 845-856.
20. Grant, P.R. & Price, T.D. (1981). Population variation in continuously varying traits as an ecological genetics problem. Am. Zool., 21, 795-811.
21. Hadfield, J.D. (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1-22.
22. Hendry, A.P. & Gonzalez, A. (2008). Whither adaptation? Biol. Philos., 23, 673-699.
23. Hendry, A.P., Day, T. & Taylor, E.B. (2001). Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution, 55, 459-466.
24. Hereford, J. (2009). A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Nat., 173, 579-588.
25. Hereford, J., Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. (2004). Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution, 58, 2133-2143.
26. Hersch, E.I. & Phillips, P.C. (2004). Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution, 58, 479-485.
27. Hoekstra, H.E., et al. (2001). Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 9157-9160.
28. Hunt, G., Bell, M.A. & Travis, M.P. (2008). Evolution toward a new adaptive optimum: phenotypic evolution in a fossil stickleback lineage. Evolution, 62, 700-710.
29. Kawecki, T. & Stearns, S. (1993). The evolution of life histories in spatially heterogeneous environments: optimal reaction norms revisited. Evol. Ecol., 7, 155-174.
30. Kingsolver, J.G., et al. (2001). The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat., 157, 245-261.
31. Kingsolver, J.G. & Diamond, S.E. (2011). Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection? Am. Nat., 177, 346-357.
32. Kingsolver, J.G. & Pfennig, D.W. (2004). Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution, 58, 1608-1612.
33. Kingsolver, J., Diamond, S., Siepielski, A. & Carlson, S. (2012). Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: lessons, limitations and future directions. Evol. Ecol., 1-18.
34. Knapczyk, F.N. & Conner, J.K. (2007). Estimates of the average strength of natural selection are not inflated by sampling error or publication bias. Am. Nat., 170, 501-508.
35. Lande, R (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution, 33, 402-416.
36. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210-1226.
37. Lenormand, T. (2002). Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 183-189.
38. Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, Some Theoretical Explorations.
39. MacArthur, R.H. (1962). Some generalized theorems of natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 48, 1893-1897.
40. MacColl, A.D.C. (2011). The ecological causes of evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol., 26, 514-522.
41. McKinnon, J.S. & Rundle, H.D. (2002). Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 480-488.
42. Morrissey, M.B. & Hadfield, J.D. (2012). Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent. Evolution, 66, 435-442.
43. Morrissey, M.B. & Sakrejda, K. (2013). Unification of regression-based methods for the analysis of natural selection. Evolution, 67, 2094-2100.
44. Nosil, P. & Crespi, B.J. (2006). Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 9090-9095.
45. Pigliucci, M. (2001). Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
46. Rieseberg, L.H., Widmer, A., Arntz, A.M. & Burke, J.M. (2002). Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12242-12245.
47. Roughgarden, J. (1971). Density-dependent natural selection. Ecology, 52, 453-468.
48. Schemske, D.W., Mittelbach, G.G., Cornell, H.V., Sobel, J.M. & Roy, K. (2009). Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 245-269.
49. Schluter, D. (2000). The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. Siepielski, A.M. & Benkman, C.W. (2007). Convergent patterns in the selection mosaic for two North American bird-dispersed pines. Ecol. Monogr., 77, 203-220.
51. Siepielski, A.M., DiBattista, J.D. & Carlson, S.M. (2009). It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecol. Lett., 12, 1261-1276.
52. Siepielski, A.M., DiBattista, J.D., Evans, J.A. & Carlson, S.M. (2011). Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B, 278, 1572-1580.
53. Simpson, G.G. (1944). Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Hafner Pub. Co., New York.
54. Simpson, G.G. (1953). The Baldwin effect. Evolution, 7, 110-117.
55. Slatkin, M. (1985). Gene flow in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 393-430.
56. Slatkin, M. (1987). Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science, 236, 787-792.
57. Sotka, E.E. (2012). Natural selection, larval dispersal, and the geography of phenotype in the sea. Int. and Comp. Biol., 52, 538-545.
58. Steele, D.B., Siepielski, A.M. & McPeek, M.A. (2011). Sexual selection and temporal phenotypic variation in a damselfly population. J. Evol. Biol., 24, 1517-1532.
59. Stinchcombe, J.R., Agrawal, A.F., Hohenlohe, P.A., Arnold, S.J. & Blows, M.W. (2008). Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution, 62, 2435-2440.
60. Thompson, J.N. (1999). Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat., 153, S1-S14.
61. Thompson, J.N. (2005). The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
62. Thompson, J.N. & Cunningham, B.M. (2002). Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature, 417, 735-738.
63. Thompson, J.N., Nuismer, S.L. & Gomulkiewicz, R. (2002). Coevolution and maladaptation. Int. and Comp. Biol, 42, 381-387.
64. Toju, H. & Sota, T. (2006). Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. Am. Nat., 167, 105-117.
65. Urban, M.C. (2011). The evolution of species interactions across natural landscapes. Ecol. Lett., 14, 723-732.
66. Vanhoenacker, D., Ågren, J. & Ehrlén, J. (2013). Non-linear relationship between intensity of plant-animal interactions and selection strength. Ecol. Lett., 16, 198-205.
67. Wade, M.J. & Kalisz, S. (1990). The causes of natural selection. Evolution, 44, 1947-1955.
68. Zangerl, A.R. & Berenbaum, M.R. (2003). Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution, 57, 806-815.