Structuring interactions for large-scale synchronous peer learning

CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1139-1152

  Coetzee, D ^a   Lim, Seongtaek ^a   Fox, Armando ^a   Hartmann, Bjorn ^b   Hearst, Marti A ^a  

^a UC Berkeley School of Information   (United States)

^b EECS   (United States)

Author keywords

Crowdwork; Group Discussion; Peer Learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; CROWDWORK; GROUP DISCUSSIONS; INTERACTION FRAMEWORK; LEARNING SETTINGS; MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS; PEER INTERACTIONS; PEER LEARNING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84943794864     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2675251     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Astin, A. W. What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass, 1993.
2. Bernstein, M. S., Brandt, J., Miller, R. C., and Karger, D. R. Crowds in two seconds: Enabling realtime crowd-powered interfaces. In Proceedings of UIST, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 33-42.
3. Bonwell, C. C., and Eison, J. A. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University Washington, DC, 1991.
4. Chase, J., and Okie, E. G. Combining cooperative learning and peer instruction in introductory computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 372-376.
5. Chen, W., and Looi, C.-K. Active classroom participation in a group scribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology 42, 4 (2011), 676-686.
6. Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M. A., and Hartmann, B. Should your MOOC Forum Use a Reputation System? In CSCW2014 (2014).
7. Cooper, S., and Sahami, M. Reflections on Stanfords MOOCs. Commun. ACM 56, 2 (Feb. 2013), 28-30.
8. Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4, 4 (1994), 253-278.
9. Cottell, P. Cooperative Learning in Accounting, Chapter
10. In Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2012.
11. Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69, 9 (2001), 970-977.
12. Davis, B. G. Tools for Teaching. Jossey-Bass, 1993.
13. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 6031 (2011), 862-864.
14. Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., and Hartmann, B. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 1013-1022.
15. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grsel, C., and Mandl, H. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12, 2 (2002), 213-232.
16. Glass, A. L., and Sinha, N. Multiple-choice questioning is an efficient instructional methodology that may be widely implemented in academic courses to improve exam performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (2013), 471.
17. Gweon, G., Rośe, C. P., Carey, R., and Zaiss, Z. S. Providing support for adaptive scripting in an on-line collaborative learning environment. In CHI 2006 (2006).
18. Hake, R. R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-Thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66 (1998), 64.
19. Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., and Walberg, H. J. Can comprehension be taught? a quantitative synthesis of metacognitive studies. Educational researcher 17, 9 (1988), 5-8.
20. Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., and Chuang, I. HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, fall 2012-summer 2013. Tech. rep., Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Jan 2014.
21. Huang, J., Dasgupta, A., Ghosh, A., Manning, J., and Sanders, M. Superposter behavior in mooc forums. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, ACM (2014), 117-126.
22. III, H. L. R., and Karpicke, J. D. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-Term retention. Psychological Science 17, 3 (2006).
23. Ipeirotis, P. G. Demographics of mechanical turk. Tech. rep., New York University Stern School of Business, mar 2010.
24. Isenberg, D. J. Group polarization: A critical review and meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 6 (1986), 1141.
25. James, M. C., and Willoughby, S. Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might suprise you! American Journal of Physics 79, 1 (Jan 2011), 123-132.
26. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company Edina, MN, 1991.
27. King, A. Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5, 4 (1991), 331-346.
28. King, A. Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into practice 41, 1 (2002), 33-39.
29. Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., and Suh, B. Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk. In CHI08 (2008), 453-456.
30. Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, U., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., and Klemmer, S. Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions of Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 6 (2013).
31. Lasecki, W. S., Song, Y. C., Kautz, H., and Bigham, J. P. Real-Time crowd labeling for deployable activity recognition. In Proceedings of CSCW, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1203-1212.
32. Laughlin, P. R., and McGlynn, R. P. Collective induction: Mutual group and individual influence by exchange of hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 6 (1986), 567-589.
33. Lieberman, M. D. Learning from others. The Chronicle of Higher Education (April 2014), B4-B5.
34. Lim, S., Coetzee, D., Hartmann, B., Fox, A., and Hearst, M. A. Initial experiences with small group discussions in moocs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, ACM (2014), 151-152.
35. Lord, T. R. 101 reasons for using cooperative learning in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher 63, 1 (2001), 30-38.
36. Magee, R. M., Mascaro, C. M., and Stahl, G. Designing for group math discourse. In 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2013) (2013).
37. Mak, S., Williams, R., and Mackness, J. Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (2010), 275-285.
38. Martin, F. G. Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Commun. ACM 55, 8 (Aug. 2012), 26-28.
39. Martin, F. G. Will MOOCs change how we teach? CACM 55, 8 (aug 2012).
40. Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A Users Manual. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991.
41. Millis, B. Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2012.
42. Millis, B. J., and Cottell, P. G. Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Oryx Press (Phoenix, Ariz.), 1998.
43. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., and Salas, E. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-Analytic integration. Basic and applied social psychology 12, 1 (1991), 3-23.
44. Palinscar, A. S., and Herrenkohl, L. R. Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999.
45. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P. G. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision making 5, 5 (2010), 411-419.
46. Robinson, P., and Cooper, J. L. The Interactive Lecture in a Research Methods and Statistics Class, Chapter 7. In Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2012.
47. Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., and Schloss, P. J. Using the pause procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children 10, 1 (1987), 14-18.
48. Sadler, P. M., and Good, E. The impact of self-And peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment 11, 1 (2006), 1-31.
49. Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., and Neuwirth, C. Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-To-face settings and via instant messaging. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2004), 604-613.
50. Smith, K. A., Matusovich, H., Meyers, K., and Mann, L. Preparing the Next Generation of Engineering Educators and Researchers, Chapter 6. In Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2012.
51. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., and Su, T. T. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323, 5910 (2009), 122-124.
52. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., and Donovan, S. S. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research 69, 1 (1999), 21-51.
53. Strijbos, J.-W., and Stahl, G. Analyzing Interactions in CSCL: Methods, Approaches and Issues (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series). Springer, 2010, ch. How to Study Group Cognition.
54. Tausczik, Y. R., and Pennebaker, J. W. Improving teamwork using real-Time language feedback. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2013), 459-468.
55. Trausan-Matu, S., Dascalu, M., and Rebedea, T. PolyCAFe: Automatic support for the polyphonic analysis of CSCL chats. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Work (ijCSCL) 9, 2 (2014).
56. Trytten, D. A. Progressing from small group work to cooperative learning: A case study from computer science. Journal of Engineering Education 90, 1 (2001), 85-91.
57. Walther, J. B. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction a relational perspective. Communication Research 19, 1 (1992), 52-90.
58. Walther, J. B., Loh, T., and Granka, L. Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-To-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24, 1 (2005), 36-65.
59. Wang, H.-C., Fussell, S. F., and Setlock, L. D. Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming. In CHI09 (2009), 669-678.
60. Webb, N. M., and Farivar, S. Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999.
61. Wilkowski, J., Russell, D. M., and Deutsch, A. Self-evaluation in advanced power searching and mapping with google moocs. ACM Learning At Scale, L@ S 2014 (2014), 04-05.
62. Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., and Malone, T. W. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science 330, 6004 (2010), 686-688.
63. Zhu, H., Dow, S. P., Kraut, R. E., and Kittur, A. Reviewing versus doing: Learning and performance in crowd assessment. In CSCW2014, ACM (2014).