Active classroom participation in a Group Scribbles primary science classroom

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 676-686

  Chen, Wenli ^a   Looi, Chee Kit ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING PROCESS; LOGIC MODELS; SCIENCE CLASSROOM; SINGAPORE;

DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; USER INTERFACES;

TEACHING;

EID: 79958204666     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01082.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, J. R., (1996). The architecture of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Chen, W. L., Looi, C. K., &, Tan, S. N., (2009). Integrating CMC and verbal discussions in students' collaborative learning in F2F classroom. In Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2009, Rhodes Island, Greece, 8-13 June.
3. Chaudhury, S. R., Roschelle, J., Patton, C., Brecht, J., DiGiano, C., Schank, P., &, Tatar, D., (2006). Coordinating student learning in the collaborative classroom with interactive technologies. Poster presented at the 3rd International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (IS-SOTL) Conference, Washington D.C. November 9-12. Retrieved 8 October 2009 from
4. DiGiano, C., Tatar, D., &, Kireyev, K., (2006). Learning from the post-it: building collective intelligence through lightweight, flexible technology. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, Banff. Retrieved 8 October 2009 from
5. Looi, C. K., Chen, W., &, Ng, F.-K., (2009). Collaborative activities enabled by Group Scribbles (GS): an exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 54 (1), 14-26.
6. McLaughlin, J. A., &, Jordan, G. B., (1999). Logic models: a tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 65-72.
7. Mehan, H., (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Millar, A., Simeone, R. S., &, Carnevale, J. T., (2001). Logic models: a systems tool for performance management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 73-81. (Pubitemid 33648861)
9. Nassaji, N., &, Wells, G., (2000). What's the use of 'triadic dialogue'? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21, 3, 376-406.
10. Ng, F. K., Looi, C. K., &, Chen, W., (2008). Rapid collaborative knowledge building: lessons learned from two primary science classrooms. In P. A. Kirschner, J. van MerriÃnboer & T. de Jong (Eds), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of ICLS 2008. Utrecht, The Netherlands.
11. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., &, Means, B., (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10, 2, 76-101. Los Altos,CA: Packard Foundation.
12. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S. R., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., &, DiGiano, C., (2007). Ink, improvisation, and interactive engagement: Learning with tablets. Computer, 40 (9), 38-44.
13. Scardamalia, M., (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In, B. Smith, (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
14. SRI International (2006). Tuple Spaces project: Group Scribbles innovation. Retrieved 8 October 2010, from
15. Stahl, G., (Ed.) (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer.
16. Wells, G., (1999). Dialogic enquiry: towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.