Dissecting repulsion linkage in the dwarfing gene Dw3 region for sorghum plant height provides insights into heterosis

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 38, 2015, Pages 11823-11828

  Li, Xin ^a   Li, Xianran ^a   Fridman, Eyal ^b   Tesso, Tesfaye T ^c   Yu, Jianming ^a   Phillips, Ronald L ^d  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genome wide association studies; Heterosis; Plant height; Pseudo overdominance; Repulsion linkage

Indexed keywords

AUXIN; GENETIC MARKER;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROP PRODUCTION; DW1 GENE; DW2 GENE; DW3 GENE; DW4 GENE; EPIGENETICS; EPISTASIS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; HETEROSIS; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; SORGHUM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BREEDING; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CROSS BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HAPLOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HAPLOTYPES; HYBRID VIGOR; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SORGHUM;

EID: 84942921137     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1509229112     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2007) Heterosis: Revisiting the magic. Trends Genet 23(2): 60-66.
2. Duvick DN (2001) Biotechnology in the 1930s: The development of hybrid maize. Nat Rev Genet 2(1): 69-74.
3. Lin SC, Yuan LP (1980) Hybrid rice breeding in China. Innovative approaches to rice breeding. Selected Papers from the 1979 International Rice Research Conference (International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines) pp 35-51.
4. Chen ZJ (2013) Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nat Rev Genet 14(7): 471-482.
5. Goff SA (2011) A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: Energy efficiency, protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. New Phytol 189(4): 923-937.
6. Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 71-88.
7. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10(11): 783-796.
8. Allison AC (2009) Genetic control of resistance to human malaria. Curr Opin Immunol 21(5): 499-505.
9. Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42(5): 459-463.
10. Jones DF (1917) Dominance of Linked Factors as a Means of Accounting for Heterosis. Genetics 2(5): 466-479.
11. Garcia AA, Wang S, Melchinger AE, Zeng Z-B (2008) Quantitative trait loci mapping and the genetic basis of heterosis in maize and rice. Genetics 180(3): 1707-1724.
12. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140(2): 745-754.
13. Larièpe A, et al. (2012) The genetic basis of heterosis: Multiparental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 190(2): 795-811.
14. Zhou G, et al. (2012) Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(39): 15847-15852.
15. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132(3): 823-839.
16. Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37(5): 1601-1610.
17. Li ZK, et al. (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158(4): 1737-1753.
18. Yu SB, et al. (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(17): 9226-9231.
19. Tang J, et al. (2010) Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theor Appl Genet 120(2): 333-340.
20. Melchinger AE, et al. (2007) Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 177(3): 1827-1837.
21. Hua J, et al. (2003) Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(5): 2574-2579.
22. Kusterer B, et al. (2007) Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 177(3): 1839-1850.
23. Liang GH, Dayton AD, Reddy CR (1972) Heterosis, inbreeding depression, and heritability estimates in a systematic series of grain-sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci 12(4): 409-411.
24. Pfeiffer TW, Bitzer MJ, Toy JJ, Pedersen JF (2010) Heterosis in sweet sorghum and selection of a new sweet sorghum hybrid for use in syrup production in Appalachia. Crop Sci 50(5): 1788-1794.
25. Ben-Israel I, Kilian B, Nida H, Fridman E (2012) Heterotic trait locus (HTL) mapping identifies intra-locus interactions that underlie reproductive hybrid vigor in Sorghum bicolor. PLoS One 7(6): e38993.
26. Packer DJ, Rooney WL (2014) High-parent heterosis for biomass yield in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum hybrids. Field Crops Res 167: 153-158.
27. Quinby JR (1963) Manifestations of hybrid vigor in sorghum. Crop Sci 3(4): 288-291.
28. Sinha SK, Khanna R (1975) Physiological, biochemical, and genetic basis of heterosis. Adv Agron 27: 123-174.
29. Uzarowska A, et al. (2007) Comparative expression profiling in meristems of inbredhybrid triplets of maize based on morphological investigations of heterosis for plant height. Plant Mol Biol 63(1): 21-34.
30. Flint-Garcia SA, Buckler ES, Tiffin P, Ersoz E, Springer NM (2009) Heterosis is prevalent for multiple traits in diverse maize germplasm. PLoS One 4(10): e7433.
31. Shen G, Zhan W, Chen H, Xing Y (2014) Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice. Plant Sci 215-216: 11-18.
32. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD (1996) Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 92(6): 637-643.
33. Zhang Y, Ni Z, Yao Y, Nie X, Sun Q (2007) Gibberellins and heterosis of plant height in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genet 8: 40.
34. Quinby JR, Karper RE (1954) inheritance of height in sorghum. Agron J 46(5): 211-216.
35. Multani DS, et al. (2003) Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science 302(5642): 81-84.
36. Brown PJ, Rooney WL, Franks C, Kresovich S (2008) Efficient mapping of plant height quantitative trait loci in a sorghum association population with introgressed dwarfing genes. Genetics 180(1): 629-637.
37. Morris GP, et al. (2013) Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(2): 453-458.
38. Klein RR, et al. (2008) The effect of tropical sorghum conversion and inbred development on genome diversity as revealed by high-resolution genotyping. Crop Sci (Supplement 1): S-12-S-26.
39. Casa AM, et al. (2008) Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci 48(1): 30-40.
40. Murray SC, Rooney WL, Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (2009) Sweet sorghum genetic diversity and association mapping for brix and height. Plant Genome 2(1): 48-62.
41. Upadhyaya HD, Wang Y-H, Gowda CLL, Sharma S (2013) Association mapping of maturity and plant height using SNP markers with the sorghum mini core collection. Theor Appl Genet 126(8): 2003-2015.
42. Segura V, et al. (2012) An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat Genet 44(7): 825-830.
43. Birchler JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S, Vaiman D, Veitia RA (2010) Heterosis. Plant Cell 22(7): 2105-2112.
44. Kaeppler S (2012) Heterosis: Many genes, many mechanisms - end the search for an undiscovered unifying theory. ISRN Botany 2012: 682824.
45. Li L, et al. (2008) Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids. Genetics 180(3): 1725-1742.
46. Russell WA, Eberhart SA, Vega UA (1973) Recurrent selection for specific combining ability for yield in 2 maize populations. Crop Sci 13(2): 257-261.
47. Huang X, et al. (2015) Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat Commun 6: 6258.
48. Gardner CO, Lonnquist JH (1959) Linkage and the degree of dominance of genes controlling quantitative characters in maize. Agron J 51(9): 524-528.
49. Moll RH, Lindsey MF, Robinson HF (1964) Estimates of genetic variances and level of dominance in maize. Genetics 49(3): 411-423.
50. McMullen MD, et al. (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325(5941): 737-740.
51. Li X, Zhu C, Wang J, Yu J (2012) Computer simulation in plant breeding. Adv Agron 116: 219-264.
52. Higgins RH, Thurber CS, Assaranurak I, Brown PJ (2014) Multiparental mapping of plant height and flowering time QTL in partially isogenic sorghum families. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics 4(9): 1593-1602.
53. Srinivas G, et al. (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci for agronomically important traits and their association with genic-microsatellite markers in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 118(8): 1439-1454.
54. Salas Fernandez MG, Becraft PW, Yin Y, Lübberstedt T (2009) From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci 14(8): 454-461.
55. Davies PJ (2004) Plant Hormones: Biosynthesis, Signal Transduction, Action! (Springer, Dordrecht) Ed. 3.
56. Thurber CS, Ma JM, Higgins RH, Brown PJ (2013) Retrospective genomic analysis of sorghum adaptation to temperate-zone grain production. Genome Biol 14(6): R68.
57. Zamir D (2001) Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2(12): 983-989.
58. Yu J, Hamblin M, Tuinstra M (2013) Association Genetics Strategies and Resources. Genomics of the Saccharinae, Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models, ed Paterson AH (Springer, New York), Vol 11, pp 187-203.
59. Doyle JJ (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15.
60. Elshire RJ, et al. (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6(5): e19379.
61. Wu Y, Bhat PR, Close TJ, Lonardi S (2008) Efficient and accurate construction of genetic linkage maps from the minimum spanning tree of a graph. PLoS Genet 4(10): e1000212.
62. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng Z-B (2012) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5 (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC).
63. Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet 81(5): 1084-1097.
64. Lipka AE, et al. (2012) GAPIT: Genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28(18): 2397-2399.
65. Zhang Z, et al. (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42(4): 355-360.