Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice

Plant Science

Volumn 215-216, Issue , 2014, Pages 11-18

  Shen, Guojing ^a   Zhan, Wei ^a   Chen, Huaxia ^a   Xing, Yongzhong ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chromosome segment substitution line; Dominance; Epistasis; Midparent heterosis; Plant height

Indexed keywords

TETRA;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME SEGMENT SUBSTITUTION LINE; CROSS BREEDING; DOMINANCE; DOMINANT GENE; EPISTASIS; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HETEROSIS; HISTOLOGY; MIDPARENT HETEROSIS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENE; PLANT HEIGHT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RICE;

CHROMOSOME SEGMENT SUBSTITUTION LINE; DOMINANCE; EPISTASIS; MIDPARENT HETEROSIS; PLANT HEIGHT;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, PLANT; HYBRID VIGOR; ORYZA SATIVA; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84888040996     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Davenport C.B. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 1908, 28:454-455.
2. Bruce A.B. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 1910, 32(827):627-628.
3. East E.M. Inbreeding in corn. Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for years 1907-1908 1908, 419-428.
4. Shull G.H. The composition of a field of maize. Ann. Breed. Assoc. Rep. 1908, 4:296-301.
5. Jones D.F. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1917, 3:310-312.
6. Crow J.F. Dominance and overdominance. Heterosis 1952, 282-297. Iowa State College Press, Ames. J.W. Gowen (Ed.).
7. Richey F.D. Mock-dominance and hybrid vigor. Science 1942, 96:280-281.
8. Clerget-Darpoux F., Bonaiti-Pellie C. Epistasis effect: an alternative to the hypothesis of linkage disequilibrium in HLA associated diseases. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1980, 44:195-204.
9. Stuber C.W., Lincoln S.E., Wolff D.W., Helentjaris T., Lander E.S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 1992, 132:823-839.
10. Xiao J.H., Li J.M., Yuan L.P., Tanksley S.D. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 1995, 140:745-754.
11. Yu S.B., Li J.X., Xu C.G., Tan Y.F., Gao Y.J., et al. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:9226-9231.
12. Xiong L.Z., Yang G.P., Xu C.G., Zhang Q.F., Maroof M.A.S. Relationship of differential gene expression in leaves with heterosis and heterozygosity in a rice diallel cross. Mol. Breed. 1998, 4:129-136.
13. Kusterer B., Muminovic J., Utz H.F., Piepho H.P., Barth S., et al. Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2007, 175:2009-2017.
14. Li L.Z., Lu K.Y., Chen Z.M., Mu T.M., Hu Z.L., et al. Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids. Genetics 2008, 180:1725-1742.
15. Hua J.P., Xing Y.Z., Xu C.G., Sun X.L., Yu S.B., et al. Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 2002, 162:1885-1895.
16. 2 population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:333-340.
17. Semel Y., Nissenbaum J., Menda N., Zinder M., Krieger U., et al. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12981-12986.
18. Meyer R.C., Kusterer B., Lisec J., Steinfath M., Becher M., et al. QTL analysis of early stage heterosis for biomass in Arabidopsis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:227-237.
19. Wang Z.Q., Yu C.Y., Liu X., Liu S.J., Yin C.B., et al. Identification of indica rice chromosome segments for the improvement of japonica inbreds and hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124:1351-1364.
20. Larièpe A., Mangin B., Jasson S., Combes V., Dumas F., et al. The genetic basis of heterosis: multiparental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 2012, 190:795-811.
21. Cockerham C.C., Zeng Z.B. Design III with marker loci. Genetics 1996, 143:1437-1456.
22. Garcia A.A., Wang S.C., Melchinger A.E., Zeng Z.B. Quantitative trait loci mapping and the genetic basis of heterosis in maize and rice. Genetics 2008, 180:1707-1724.
23. Fu Y.B., Ritland K. Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 1994, 136:323-331.
24. Li Z.K., Luo L.J., Mei H.W., Wang D.L., Shu Q.Y., et al. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 2001, 158:1737-1753.
25. Zhou G., Chen Y., Yao W., Zhang C.J., Xie W.B., et al. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:15847-15852.
26. Hua J.P., Xing Y.Z., Wu W.R., Xu C.G., Sun X.L., et al. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:2574-2579.
27. Cai X.D., Huang A.H., Xu S.Z. Fast empirical bayesian LASSO for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:211.
28. Kusterer B., Piepho H.P., Utz H.F., Schon C.C., Muminovic J., et al. Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 2007, 177:1839-1850.
29. Melchinger A.E., Utz H.F., Schon C.C. Genetic expectations of quantitative trait loci main and interaction effects obtained with the triple testcross design and their relevance for the analysis of heterosis. Genetics 2008, 178:2265-2274.
30. Yu S.B., Li J.X., Xu C.G., Tan Y.F., Li X.H., et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci and epistatic interactions for plant height and heading date in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104:619-625.
31. Zhang Y., Ni Z.F., Yao Y.Y., Nie X.L., Sun Q.X. Gibberellins and heterosis of plant height in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genet. 2007, 8:40.
32. Xing Y.Z., Tan Y.F., Hua J.P., Sun X.L., Xu C.G., et al. Characterization of the main efects, epistatic efects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105:248-257.
33. Murray M.G., Thompson W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8:4321.
34. Wu K.S., Tanksley S.D. Abundance, polymorphism and genetic mapping of microsatellites in rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 241:225-235.
35. Lander E.S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989, 121:185-199.
36. Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach 1980, 633. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
37. Gutowska I. Metal-metal interactions in hard tissue studied with statistica neural networks. Ann. Acad. Med. Stetin. 2005, 51:115-124.
38. Li Z.K., Pinson S.R.M., Park W.D., Paterson A.H., Stansel J.W. Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 1997, 145:453-465.
39. Melchinger A.E., Piepho H.P., Utz H.F., Muminovic J., Wegenast T., et al. Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 2007, 177:1827-1837.
40. Xue W.Y., Xing Y.Z., Weng X.Y., Zhao Y., Tang W.J., et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:761-767.
41. He Q., Zhang K.X., Xu C.G., Xing Y.Z. Additive and additive×additive interaction make important contributions to spikelets per panicle in rice near isogenic (Oryza sativa L.) lines. J. Genet. Genom. 2010, 37:795-803.
42. Bai X.F., Wu B., Xing Y.Z. Yield-related QTLs and their applications in rice genetic improvement. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54:300-311.
43. Yan W.H., Wang P., Chen H.X., Zhou H.J., Li Q.P., et al. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol. Plant. 2011, 4:319-330.
44. Yan W.H., Liu H.Y., Zhou X.C., Li Q.P., Zhang J., et al. Natural variation in Ghd7.1 plays an important role in grain yield and adaptation in rice. Cell Res. 2013, 23:969-971.
45. Liu T.M., Liu H.Y., Zhang H., Xing Y.Z. Validation and characterization of Ghd7.1, a major QTL with pleiotropic effects on spikelets per panicle, plant height, and heading date in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55:917-921.
46. Rocha J.L., Eisen E.J., Van Vleck L.D., Pomp D. A large-sample QTL study in mice: II. Body composition. Mamm. Genome 2004, 15:100-113.
47. Kearsey M.J., Kojima K.I. The genetic architecture of body weight and egg hatchability in drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1967, 56:23-37.
48. Eshed Y., Zamir D. An introgression line population of lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 1995, 141:1147-1162.
49. Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:983-989.
50. Xing Y.Z., Xu C.G., Hua J.P., Tan Y.F., Sun X.L. Mapping and isolation of quantitative trait loci controlling plant height and heading date in rice. Acta Bot. Sin. 2001, 43:840-845.