Heterosis for biomass-related traits in arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines

Genetics

Volumn 177, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1839-1850

  Kusterer, Barbara ^a   Piepho, Hans Peter ^a   Utz, H Friedrich ^a   Schön, Chris C ^a   Muminovic, Jasmina ^a   Meyer, Rhonda C ^b,c   Altmann, Thomas ^b,c   Melchinger, Albrecht E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HETEROSIS; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ARABIDOPSIS; BIOMASS; BREEDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; HYBRID VIGOR; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 37249047891     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.077628     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. BARTH, S., A. K. BUSIMI, H. F. UTZ and A. E. MELCHINGER, 2003 Heterosis for biomass yield and related traits in five hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Heredity 91: 36-42.
2. BECKER, H. C., 1993 Pflanzenzüchtung. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
3. BRUCE, A. B., 1910 The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32: 627-628.
4. BURNHAM, K. P., and D. R. ANDERSON, 2004 Multimodel interference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33: 261-304.
5. CHARCOSSET, A., and A. GALLAIS, 1996 Estimation of contribution of quantitative trait loci (QTL) to the variance of a quantitative trait by means of genetic markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1193-1201.
6. CHURCHILL, G. A., and R. W. DOERGE, 1994 Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138: 963-971.
7. CLARK, R., G. SCHWEIKERT, C. TOOMAJIAN, S. OSSOWSKI, G. ZELLER et al., 2007 Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317: 338-342.
8. COCKERHAM, C. C., and Z. B. ZENG, 1996 Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437-1456.
9. COMSTOCK, R. E., and H. F. ROBINSON, 1952 Estimation of average dominance of genes, pp. 494-516 in Heterosis, edited by J. W. GOWEN. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.
10. CRANE, C. F., and Y. M. CRANE, 2005 A nearest-neighboring-end algorithm for genetic mapping. Bioinformatics 21: 1579-1591.
11. CROW, J. F., 1948 Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33: 477-487.
12. DAVENPORT, C. B., 1908 Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
13. DUVICK, D. N., 1999 Heterosis: feeding people and protecting natural resources, pp. 19-29 in Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis, edited by J. G. Coors and S. Pandey. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
14. EAST, E. M., 1908 Inbreeding in corn. Report of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 419-428.
15. EL-LiTHY, M., L. BENTSINK, C. J. HANHART, G. J. RUYS, D. ROVITO et al., 2006 New Arabidopsis recombinant inbred populations genotyped using SNPWave and their use for mapping floweringtime quantitative trait loci. Genetics 172: 1867-1876.
16. FRASCAROLI, E., M. A. CANÉ, P. LANDI, G. PEA, L. GIANFRANCESCHI et al., 2007 Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625-644.
17. FU, H., and H. K. DOONER, 2002 Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 9573-9578.
18. HOLLAND, J. B., 1998 EPISTACY: a SAS program for detecting two-locus epistatic interactions using genetic marker information. J. Hered. 89: 374-375.
19. HOLM, S., 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6: 65-790.
20. HUA, J., Y. XING, W. WU, C. XU, X. SUN et al., 2002 Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162: 1885-1895.
21. HUA, J., Y. XING, W. WU, C. XU, X. SUN et al., 2003 Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2574-2579.
22. HULL, F. H., 1945 Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 37: 134-145.
23. JANSEN, R. C., and P. STAM, 1994 High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136: 1447-1455.
24. JIANG, C., and Z. B. ZENG, 1995 Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140: 1111-1127.
25. JONES, D. F., 1917 Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2: 466-479.
26. KAO, C. H., and Z. B. ZENG, 2002 Modeling epistasis of quantitative trait loci using Cockerham's model. Genetics 160: 1243-1261.
27. KEARSEY, M. J., and J. L. JINKS, 1968 A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403-409.
28. KEARSEY, M. J., H. S. POONI and N. H. SYED, 2003 Genetics of quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 91: 456-464.
29. KROYMANN, J., and T. MITCHELL-OLDS, 2005 Epistasis and balanced polymorphism influencing complex trait variation. Nature 435: 95-98.
30. KUSTERER, B., J. MUMINOVIC, H. F. UTZ, H.-P. PIEPHO, S. BARTH et al., 2007 Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175: 2009-2017.
31. LI, Z. K, L. J. LUO, H. W. MEI, D. L. WANG, Q. Y. SHU et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
32. LIN, X., S. KAUL, S. ROUNSLEY, T. P. SHEA, M. I. BENITO et al., 1999 Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 402: 761-768.
33. LOUDET, O., S. CHAILLOU, C. CAMILLERI, D. BOUCHEZ and F. DANIEL-VEDELE, 2002 Bay-0 X Shahdara recombinant inbred line population: a powerful tool for the genetic dissection of complex traits in Arabidopsis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1173-1184.
34. LU, H., J. ROMERO-SEVERSON and R. BERNARDO, 2003 Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a randommated maize population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 494-502.
35. LUO, L. J., Z. K. LI, H. W. MEI, Q. Y. SHU, R. TABIEN et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
36. MALMBERG, R. L., S. HELD, A. WAITS and R. MAURICIO, 2005 Epistasis for fitness-related quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in the field and in the greenhouse. Genetics 171: 2013-2027.
37. MANICHAIKUL, A., J. DUPUIS, S. SEN and K. W. BROMAN, 2006 Poor performance of bootstrap confidence intervals for the location of quantitative trait locus. Genetics 174: 481-489.
38. MAYER, K., C. SCHÜLLER, R. WAMBUTT, G. MURPHY, G. VOLCKAERT et al., 1999 Sequence and analysis of chromosome 4 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 402: 769-777.
39. MELCHINGER, A. E., J. BOPPENMAIER, B. S. DHILLON, W. G. POLLMER and R. G. HERRMANN, 1992 Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds: II. Relation to performance of hybrids within versus between heterotic groups for forage traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 672-681.
40. MELCHINGER, A. E., H. F. UTZ, H. P. PIEPHO, Z. B. ZENG and C. C. SCHÖN, 2007 The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
41. MEYER, R. C., O. TÖRJÉK, M. BECHER and T. ALTMANN, 2004 Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol. 134: 1813-1823.
42. MODE, C. J., and H. F. ROBINSON, 1959 Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics 15: 518-537.
43. MOLL, R. H., and H. F. ROBINSON, 1967 Quantitative genetic investigations of yield of maize. Genet. Breed. Res. 37: 192-199.
44. MORENO-GONZALEZ, J., 1993 Efficiency of generations for estimating marker-associated QTL effects by multiple regression. Genetics 135: 223-231.
45. PIEPHO, H. P., and H. G. GAUCH, 2001 Marker pair selection of mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 157: 433-444.
46. POWERS, L., 1944 An expansion of Jones' theory for the explanation of heterosis. Am. Nat. 78: 275-280.
47. RAFTERY, A. E., 1995 Bayesian model selection in social research, pp. 111-196 in Sociological Methodology, edited by P. V. MARSDEN. Blackwell, Cambridge, UK.
48. RAO, C. R., 1973 Linear Statistical Interference and Its Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
49. SALANOUBAT, M., L. LEMCKE, M. RIEGER, W. ANSORGE, M. UNSELD et al., 2000 Sequence and analysis of chromosome 3 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 820-822.
50. SAS INSTITUTE, 2004 SAS Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
51. SCHNELL, F. W., 1982 A synoptic study of the methods and categories of plant breeding. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 89: 1-18.
52. SEARLE, S. R., 1971 Linear Models. Wiley & Sons, New York.
53. SEMEL, Y., J. NISSENBAUM, N. MENDA, M. ZINDER, U. KRIEGER et al., 2006 Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 130: 12981-12986.
54. SHULL, G. H., 1908 The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breed. Assoc. Rep. 4: 296-301.
55. SHULL, G. H., 1922 Über die heterozygotie mit rücksicht auf den praktischen züchtungserfolg. Beitr. Pflanzenzucht. 5: 134-158.
56. STRAM, D. O., and J. W. LEE, 1994 Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
57. STUBER, C. W., S. E. LINCOLN, D. W. WOLFF, T. HELENTJARIS and E. S. LANDER, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
58. TABATA, S., T. KANEKO, Y. NAKAMURA, H. KOTANI, T. KATO et al., 2000 Sequence and analysis of chromosome 5 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 823-826.
59. THEOLOGIS, T., J. R. ECKER, C. J. PALM, N. A. FEDERSPIEL, S. KAUL et al., 2000 Sequence and analysis of chromosome 1 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 816-820.
60. TÖRJÉK, O., D. BERGER, R. C. MEYER, C. MÜSSIG, K. J. SCHMID et al., 2003 Establishment of a high-efficiency SNP-based framework marker set for Arabidopsis. Plant J. 36: 122-140.
61. TÖRJÉK, O., H. WITUCKA WALL, R. C. MEYER, M. VON KORFF, B. KUSTERER et al., 2006 Segregation distortion in Arabidopsis C24/ Col-0 and Col-0/C24 recombinant inbred line populations is due to reduced fertility caused by epistatic interaction of two loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 1551-1561.
62. UTZ, H. F., and A. E. MELCHINGER, 1996 PLABQTL: a program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J. Agric. Genomics 2: 1-5.
63. UTZ, H. F., A. E. MELCHINGER and C. C. SCHÖN, 2000 Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by quantitative trait loci determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation and validation with independent samples. Genetics 154: 1839-1849.
64. WILLIAMS, W., 1959 Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters. Nature 184: 527-530.
65. XIAO, J., J. LI, L. YUAN and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
66. YANG, R. C., 2004 Epistasis of quantitative trait loci under different gene action models. Genetics 167: 1493-1505.
67. YU, S. B., J. X. LI, C. G. XU, Y. F. TAN, Y. J. GAO et al., 1997 Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9226-9231.
68. ZENG, Z. B., 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457-1468.