Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids

Genetics

Volumn 180, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1725-1742

  Li, Lanzhi ^a   Lu, Kaiyang ^b   Chen, Zhaoming ^a   Mu, Tongmin ^b   Hu, Zhongli ^a,b   Li, Xinqi ^c  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c China National Hybrid Rice Research and Development Center   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACKCROSSING; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRAIT; GRAIN YIELD; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOSITY; HYBRID; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; RICE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; DOMINANT GENE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENE;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; HYBRID VIGOR; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MODELS, GENETIC; ORYZA SATIVA; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 59449093971     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.091942     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ALLARD, R. W., 1988 Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. J. Hered. 79: 225-238.
2. BRUCE, A. B., 1910 The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32: 627-628.
3. CAUSSE, M., T. M. FULTONY, G. CHO, S. N. AHN, K. WU et al., 1994 Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics 138: 1251-1274.
4. COCKERHAM, C. C., and Z. B. ZENG, 1996 Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437-1456.
5. COMSTOCK, R. E., and H. F. ROBINSON, 1952 Estimation of average dominance of genes, pp. 494-516 in Heterosis, edited by J. W. GROWEN. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.
6. CROW, J. F., 2000 The rise and fall of overdominance. Plant Breed. Rev. 17: 225-257.
7. DAVENPORT, C. B., 1908 Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
8. EAST, E. M., 1908 Inbreeding in corn, pp. 419-428 in Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for Years 1907-1908.
9. FRASCAROLI, E., M. A. CANE, P. LANDI, G. G. PEA, M. VILLA et al., 2007 Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625-644.
10. GROH, S., D. GONZÀLES-DE-LEÒN, M. M. KHAIRALLAH, C. JIANG, D. BERGVINSON et al., 1998 QTL mapping in tropical maize: III. Genomic regions for resistance to Diatraea spp. and associated traits in two RIL populations. Crop Sci. 38: 1062-1072.
11. HALLAUER, A. R., and B. MIRANDA, 1981 Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
12. HOECKER, N., B. KELLER, H. P. PIEPHO and F. HOCHHOLDINGER, 2006 Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 421-429.
13. HU, Z. L., X. F. ZHANG, C. XIE, G. R. MCDANIEL and D. L. KUHLERS, 1995 A correlation method for detecting and estimating linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus using inbred lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 1074-1078.
14. HU, Z. L., Q. X. SUN, X. F. ZHANG, Y. C. SONG and Q. F. ZHANG, 2002 A correlation method for detecting epistatic QTLs using inbred lines. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1: 122-126.
15. HUA, J. P., Y. Z. XING, C. G. XU, X. L. SUN, S. B. YU et al., 2002 Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162: 1885-1895.
16. HUA, J., Y. XING, W. WU, C. XU, X. SUN et al., 2003 Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2574-2579.
17. JONES, D. F., 1917 Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 3: 310-312.
18. KEARSEY, M. J., and J. L. JINKS, 1968 A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403-409.
19. KEARSEY, M. J., and H. S. POONI, 1996 The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
20. KEARSEY, M. J., H. S. POONI and N. H. SYED, 2003 Genetics of quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 91: 456-464.
21. KUSTERER, B., J. MUMINOVIC, H. F. UTZ, H. P. PIEPHO, S. BARTH et al., 2007a Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175: 2009-2017.
22. KUSTERER, B., H. P. PIEPHO, H. F. UTZ, C. C. SCHÖN, J. MUMINOVIC et al., 2007b Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait analysis of the triple-testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 177: 1839-1850.
23. LI, Z. K., S. R. M. PINSON, A. H. PATERSON, W. D. PARK and J. W. STANSEL, 1997 Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145: 453-465.
24. LI, Z. K., L. J. LUO, H. W. MEI, D. L. WANG, Q. Y. SHU et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
25. LIPPMAN, Z. B., and D. ZAMIR, 2007 Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet. 23: 60-66.
26. LU, Q. S., Y. SUN and Z. T. HUA, 2002 Heterosis of Cereal Crops, p. 240. Science and Technology of China Agricultural Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
27. LUO, L. J., Z. K. LI, H. W. MEI, Q. Y. SHU, R. TABIEN et al., 2001 Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
28. MEI, H. W., Z. K. LI, Q. Y. SHU, L. B. GUO, Y. P. WANG et al., 2005 Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two backcross populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 649-659.
29. MELCHINGER, A. E., H. P. PIEPHO, H. FRIEDRICH UTZ, J. MUMINOVIĆ, T. WEGENAST et al., 2007a Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 177: 1827-1837.
30. MELCHINGER, A. E., H. F. UTZ, H. P. PIEPHO, Z. B. ZENG and C. C. SCHÖN, 2007b The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
31. SAS INSTITUTE, 1996 SAS Users Guide: Statistic. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
32. SCHENA, M., R. A. HELLER, T. P. THERIAULT, K. KONRAD, E. LACHENMEIER et al., 1998 Microarrays: biotechnology's discovery platform for functional genomics. Trends Biotechnol. 16: 301-306.
33. SCHNELL, F. W., and C. C. COCKERHAM, 1992 Multiplicative vs. arbitrary gene action in heterosis. Genetics 131: 461-469.
34. SEMEL, Y., J. NISSENBAUM, N. MENDA, M. ZINDER, U. KRIEGER et al., 2006 Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 12981-12986.
35. SHULL, G. H., 1908 The composition of a field of maize. Ann. Breed. Assoc. Rep. 4: 296-301.
36. STUBER, C. W., M. D. EDWARDS and J. F. WENDEL, 1987 Molecular marker-facilitated investigation of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yields and its component traits. Crop Sci. 27: 639-648.
37. STUBER, C. W., S. E. LINCOLN, D. W. WOLFF, T. HELENTJARIS and E. S. LANDER, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
38. 1 hybrid. Genetics 173: 2199-2210.
39. 1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 6805-6810.
40. SYED, N. H., and Z. J. CHEN, 2005 Molecular marker genotypes, heterozygosity and genetic interactions explain heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 94: 295-304.
41. TOLLENAAR, M., A. AHMADZADEH and E. A. LEE, 2004 Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Sci. 44: 2086-2094.
42. VAN, B. R., 1999 GGT: software for the display of graphical genotypes. J. Hered. 90: 328-329.
43. WANG, D. L., J. ZHU, L. LI and A. H. PATERSON, 1999 Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL X environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1255-1264.
44. XIAO, J., J. LI, L. YUAN and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
45. XING, Y. Z., Y. F. TAN, J. P. HUA, J. P. SUN, C. G. XU et al., 2002 Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet 105: 248-257.
46. YU, S. B., J. X. LI, C. G. XU, Y. F. TAN, Y. J. GAO et al., 1997 Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94: 9226-9231.
47. ZENG, Z. B., 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457-1468.
48. ZHANG, Q., Y. J. GAO, M. A. SAGHAI, S. H. MAROOF and J. X. LI YANG, 1995 Molecular divergence and hybrid performance in rice. Mol. Breed. 1: 133-142.