The genetic basis of heterosis: Multiparentalquantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.)

Genetics

Volumn 190, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 795-811

  Lariepe A ^a,b   Mangin, B ^a   Jasson, S ^c   Combes, V ^c   Dumas, F ^a   Jamin, P ^a   Lariagon, C ^a   Jolivot, D ^a   Madur, D ^a   Fievet J ^a   Gallais, A ^a   Dubreuil, P ^b   Charcosset, A ^a   Moreau, L ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b Biogemma   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENE MAPPING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GRAIN YIELD; HETEROSIS; MAIZE; MOISTURE; NONHUMAN; PLANT HEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ALLELES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENES, DOMINANT; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOZYGOTE; HYBRID VIGOR; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84857438156     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.133447     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ajmone Marsan, P., C. Gorni, A. Chittò, R. Redaelli, R. van Vijk et al., 2001 Identification of QTLs for grain yield and grainrelated traits of maize (Zea mays L.) using an AFLP map, different testers, and cofactor analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 230-243.
2. Barbosa, A. M. M., I. O. Geraldi, L. L. Benchimol, A. A. F. Garcia, C. L. Souza et al., 2003 Relationship of intra-and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers. Euphytica 130: 87-99.
3. Bernardo, R., 1992 Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 628-634.
4. Blanc, G., A. Charcosset, B. Mangin, A. Gallais, and L. Moreau, 2006 Connected populations for detecting quantitative trait loci and testing for epistasis: an application in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 206-224.
5. Bruce, A. B., 1910 The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32: 627-628.
6. Butler, D., B. R. Cullis, A. R. Gilmour, and B. J. Gogel, 2009 ASReml- R Reference Manual. The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, Australia.
7. Causse, M., S. Santoni, C. Damerval, A. Maurice, A. Charcosset et al., 1996 A composite map of expressed sequences in maize. Genome 39: 418-432.
8. Charcosset, A., and L. Essioux, 1994 The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 336-343.
9. Charcosset, A., M. Lefort-Buson, and A. Gallais, 1991 Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 571-575.
10. Charcosset, A., B. Mangin, L. Moreau, L. Combes, M. F. Jourjon et al., 2000 Heterosis in maize investigated using connected RIL populations, pp. 89-98 in Quantitative Genetics and Breeding Methods: The Way Ahead. INRA, Paris.
11. Charlesworth, D., and J. H. Willis, 2009 The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 783-796.
12. Cockerham, C. C., and Z. B. Zeng, 1996 Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437-1456.
13. Comstock, R. E., and H. F. Robinson, 1952 Estimation of averagedominance of genes, pp. 494-516 in Heterosis, edited by J. W. Gowen. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.
14. Crow, J. F., 1948 Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33: 477.
15. Crow, J. F., J. G. Coors, and S. Pandey, 1952 Dominance and overdominance, pp. 282-297 in Heterosis, edited by J. W. Gowen. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.
16. Cullis, B. R., W. J. Lill, J. A. Fisher, B. J. Read, and A. C. Gleeson, 1989 A new procedure for the analysis of early generation variety trials. Appl. Stat. 38: 361-375.
17. Darwin, C., 1876 The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murray, London.
18. Davenport, C. B., 1908 Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
19. East, E., 1908 Inbreeding in corn, pp. 419-428 in Reports of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station for Years 1907-1908. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT.
20. Fiévet, J. B., C. Dillmann, and D. de Vienne, 2010 Systemic properties of metabolic networks lead to an epistasis-based model for heterosis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 463-473.
21. Frascaroli, E., M. A. Canè, P. Landi, G. Pea, L. Gianfranceschi et al., 2007 Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 176: 625-644.
22. Frascaroli, E., M. A. Canè, M. E. Pè, G. Pea, M. Morgante et al., 2009 QTL detection in maize testcross progenies as affected by related and unrelated testers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118: 993-1004.
23. Gallais, A., 2009 Hétérosis et Variétés Hybrides en Amélioration des Plantes. Editions Quae.
24. Garcia, A. A. F., S. Wang, A. E. Melchinger, and Z.-B. Zeng, 2008 Quantitative trait loci mapping and the genetic basis of heterosis in maize and rice. Genetics 180: 1707-1724.
25. Graham, G. I., D. W. Wolff, and C. W. Stuber, 1997 Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci. 37: 1601-1610.
26. Haldane, J. B. S., 1919 The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet. 8: 299-309.
27. Hallauer, A. R., and J. Miranda, 1981 Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA
28. Hua, J., Y. Xing, W. Wu, C. Xu, X. Sun et al., 2003 Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2574-2579.
29. Huang, Y. F., D. Madur, V. Combes, C. L. Ky, D. Coubriche et al., 2010 The genetic architecture of grain yield and related traits in Zea mays L. revealed by comparing intermated and conventional populations. Genetics 186: 395.
30. Hull, F. H., 1945 Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 37: 134-145.
31. Jannink, J. L., M. C. A. M. Bink, and R. C. Jansen, 2001 Using complex plant pedigrees to map valuable genes. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 337-342.
32. Jinks, J. L., and R. M. Jones, 1958 Estimation of the components of heterosis. Genetics 43: 223-234.
33. Jones, D. F., 1917 Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2: 466-479.
34. Jourjon, M.-F., S. Jasson, J. Marcel, B. Ngom, and B. Mangin, 2005 MCQTL: multi-allelic QTL mapping in multi-cross design. Bioinformatics 21: 128-130.
35. Lamkey, K. R., and J. W. Edwards, 1999 Quantitative genetics of heterosis, pp. 31-48 in The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, edited by J. G. Coors, and S. Pandey. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
36. Lander, E. S., P. Green, J. Abrahamson, A. Barlow, M. J. Daly et al., 1987 Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174-181.
37. Lee, M., E. Godshalk, K. R. Lamkey, and W. Woodman, 1989 Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29: 1067-1071.
38. Liu, X., K. Ishiki, and W. Wang, 2002 Identification of AFLP markers favorable to heterosis in hybrid rice. Breed. Sci. 52: 201-206.
39. Lu, H., J. Romero-Severson, and R. Bernardo, 2003 Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 494-502.
40. McMullen, M. D., S. Kresovich, H. S. Villeda, P. Bradbury, H. Li et al., 2009 Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325: 737-740.
41. Melchinger, A., B. Dhillon, and X. Mi, 2010 Variation of the parental genome contribution in segregating populations derived from biparental crosses and its relationship with heterosis of their Design III progenies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 311-319.
42. Melchinger, A. E., 1999 Genetic diversity and heterosis, pp. 99-118 in The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, edited by J. G. Coors, and S. Pandey. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
43. Melchinger, A. E., H. F. Utz, and C. C. Schön, 1998 Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149: 383-403.
44. Melchinger, A. E., H. F. Utz, H. P. Piepho, Z. B. Zeng, and C. C. Schön, 2007 The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systems-oriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815-1825.
45. Moreau, L., H. Monod, A. Charcosset, and A. Gallais, 1999 Markerassisted selection with spatial analysis of unreplicated field trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 234-242.
46. Moreau, L., A. Charcosset, and A. Gallais, 2004 Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize. Euphytica 137: 111-118.
47. Pea, G., P. Paulstephenraj, M. A. Canè, M. L. S. Sardaro, P. Landi et al., 2009 Recombinant near-isogenic lines: a resource for the mendelization of heterotic QTL in maize. Mol. Genet. Genomics 281: 447-457.
48. Powers, L., 1944 An expansion of Jones's theory for the explanation of heterosis. Am. Nat. 78: 275-280.
49. R Development Core Team, 2011 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
50. Rebai, A., and B. Goffinet, 2000 More about quantitative trait locus mapping with diallel designs. Genet. Res. 75: 243-247.
51. Rebai, A., P. Blanchard, D. Perret, and P. Vincourt, 1997 Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling silking date in a diallel cross among four lines of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 451-459.
52. Richey, F. D., 1942 Mock-dominance and hybrid vigor. Science 96: 280.
53. Rogers, J. S., 1972 Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance, pp. 145-153 in Studies in Genetics 8, edited by Marshall R. Wheeler. University of Texas, Austin, TX.
54. Schön, C., B. Dhillon, H. Utz, and A. Melchinger, 2010 High congruency of QTL positions for heterosis of grain yield in three crosses of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 321-332.
55. Shull, G. H., 1908 The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breeders Assoc. Rep. 4: 296-301.
56. Shull, G. H., 1914 Duplicate genes for capsule-form in Bursa pastoris. Zeitschrift ind. Abst. u. Verebsgl. 12: 97-149.
57. Smith, O. S., J. S. C. Smith, S. L. Bowen, R. A. Tenborg, and S. J. Wall, 1990 Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 833-840.
58. Stuber, C. W., S. E. Lincoln, D. W. Wolff, T. Helentjaris, and E. S. Lander, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
59. Tang, J., J. Yan, X. Ma, W. Teng, W. Wu et al., 2010 Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 333-340.
60. Tang, J. H., X. Q. Ma, W. T. Teng, J. B. Yan, W. R. Wu et al., 2007 Detection of quantitative trait loci and heterotic loci for plant height using an immortalized F 2 population in maize. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52: 477-483.
61. Williams, W., 1959 Heterosis and the genetics of complex characters. Nature 184: 527-530.
62. Yan, J., H. Tang, Y. Huang, Y. Zheng, and J. Li, 2006 Quantitative trait loci mapping and epistatic analysis for grain yield and yield components using molecular markers with an elite maize hybrid. Euphytica 149: 121-131.