The effect of fluoride-releasing restorative materials on inhibition of secondary caries formation

Fluoride

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 258-265

  Dionysopoulos, Dimitrios ^a  

^a NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Fluoride recharge; Fluoride release; Fluoride releasing restoratives; Inhibition of secondary caries

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; POLYACRYLIC ACID; RESIN;

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG UPTAKE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PLAQUE;

EID: 84942857176     PISSN: 00154725     EISSN: 22534083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. 1 Featherstone JDB. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(7):887-99.
2. 2 Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NHF. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainees in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999;30(4):234-42.
3. 3 Wilson NHF, Burke FJT. When should we restore lesions of secondary caries and with what materials? Quintessence Int 1998;29(9):598-600.
4. 4 Buzalaf MA, Passan JP, Honorio HM, ten Cate JM. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci 2011;22:97-114.
5. 5 Ten Cate JM. In vitro studies on the effects of fluoride on de-and remineralization. J Dent Res 1990;69 Spec No:614-9.
6. 6 Featherstone JDB, Glena R, Shariati M, Shields CP. Dependence of in vitro demineralization of apatite and remineralization of dental enamel on fluoride concentration. J Dent Res 1990;69 Spec No:620-5.
7. 7 Tarn LE, Chan GP, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resinmodified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22(1):4-14.
8. 8 Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Demineralization of enamel in relation to the fluoride release of materials. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):8-12.
9. 9 Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt BA. Fluoride in dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1996.
10. 10 Modesto A, Chevitarese O, Cury JA, Vieira AR. VariGlass fluoride release and uptake by an adjacent tooth. Am J Dent 1997;10(3):123-7.
11. 11 Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in Μ coronal enamel. Quintessence Int 2000;31(8):570-8.
12. 12 Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Milano M, Flaitz C. Compomer materials and secondary caries formation. Am J Dent 2000;13(5):231-4
13. 13 Attar N, Onen A. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002;26(3):289-96.
14. 14 Yaman SD, Er O, Yetmez M, Karabay GA. In vitro inhibition of caries-like lesions with fluoride releasing materials. J Oral Sci 2004;46(1):45-50.
15. 15 Hammersfahr P. Developments in resionomer systems in glass-ionomers. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers: the next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass-Ionomers. Philadelphia, PA: International Symposia in Dentistry; 1994. pp. 47-55.
16. 16 McCabe IF. Resin modified glass ionomers. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Union Conference on Glass Ionomers. London: University of Warwick; 1966. pp. 24-8.
17. 17 Markovic D, Petrovic BB, Peric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glass ionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:21-28.
18. 18 Mungara J, Philip J, Joseph E, Rajendran S, Elangovan A, Selvaraju G. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(4):234-9.
19. 19 Mitra SB, Oxman JD, Falsafi A, Ton TT. Fluoride release and recharge behavior of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer compared with that of other fluoride releasing materials. Am J Dent 2011;24(6):372-8.
20. 20 Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley H. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J 2008;27(3):315-39.
21. 21 Naoum S, Martin E, Ellakwa A. Long-term fluoride exchanges at restoration surfaces and effects on surface mechanical properties. ISRN Dent 2013;579039.
22. 22 Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 2000;25(1):20-5.
23. 23 Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Vreven J. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(1):26-32.
24. 24 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60(2):93-7.
25. 25 Swift EJ Jr. Effect of mixing time on fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent 1988;1(4):132-4.
26. 26 Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR. Fluoride release from a fluoride-containing amalgam, a glass ionomer cement and a silicate cement in artificial saliva. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8(3):237-41.
27. 27 DeSchepper EJ, Berr EA, Cailletean JG, Take WH. A comparative study of fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1991;22(3):215-9.
28. 28 Yli-Urpo H, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Forsback AP, Vakiparta M. Release of silica, calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride from glass ionomer cement containing bioactive glass. J Biomater Appl 2004;19(1):5-20.
29. 29 Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ, Dashper SG, Eakins D, Reynolds EC. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003;82(11):914-8.
30. 30 Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. A long term study of fluoride release from metalcontaining conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(1):41-7.
31. 31 Dhondt CL, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM. Fluoride release from glass ionomer activated with fluoride solutions. J Dent Res 2001;80(5):1402-6.
32. 32 Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoridereleasing materials. Biomaterials 2003;24(14):2451-61.
33. 33 Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge ability of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32(2):1-9.
34. 34 Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin E, Swain M. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. Oper Dent 2011;36(4):422-32.
35. 35 Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C, Hellwig E. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(5):388-93.
36. 36 Preston AJ, Agalamanyi EA, Higham SM, Mair LH. The recharge of esthetic dental restorative materials with fluoride in vitro: two years' results. Dent Mater 2003;19(1):32-7.
37. 37 Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Mair LH. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(12):936-40.
38. 38 Posada A, Emilson CG, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from a resin-modified glass ionomer after exposure to NaF solutions and toothpastes. Swed Dent J 2000;24(3):117-25.
39. 39 Gao W, Smales RJ. Fluoride release/uptake of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers, and compomers. J Dent 2001;29(4):301-6.
40. 40 Attar N, Onen A. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(8):791-8.
41. 41 Han L, Cv E, Li M, Niwano K, Ab N, Okamoto A, et al. Effect of fluoride mouth rinse on fluoride releasing and recharging from aesthetic dental materials. Dent Mater J 2002;21(4):285-95.
42. 42 Itota T, Okamoto M, Sato K, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Torii Y, Inoue K. Release and recharge of fluoride by restorative materials. Dent Mater J 1999;18(4):347-53.
43. 43 Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004;20(9):789-95.
44. 44 Okida RC, Mandarino F, Sundfeld RH, de Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries formation around restoration. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2008;49(3):121-8.
45. 45 Paradella TC, de Sousa FA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Microbiological or chemical models of enamel secondary caries compared by polarized-light microscopy and energy dispersive Xray spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;90(2):635-40.
46. 46 Borges FT, Campos WR, Munari LS, Moreira AN, Paiva SM, Magalhaes CS. Cariostatic effect of fluoride-containing restorative materials associated with fluoride gels on root dentin. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(5):453-60.
47. 47 Gjorgievska E, Nicholson WJ, Iljovska S, Slipper I. The potential of fluoride-releasing dental restoratives to inhibit enamel demineralization: an SEM study. Prilozi 2009;30(1):191-204.
48. 48 Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res 1997;31(4):275-80.
49. 49 Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP, Bui HT, Mitra SB. Inhibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence Int 2009;40(4):287-94.
50. 50 Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Adey JD. Fluoride penetration into the hybrid layer from a dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1998;11(1):23-8.
51. 51 Mohammed NR, Kent NW, Lynch RJ, Karpukhina N, Hill R, Anderson P. Effects of fluoride on in vitro enamel demineralization analyzed by 19F MAS-NMR. Caries Res 2013;47(5):421-8.
52. 52 Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials: fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007;23(3):343-62.
53. 53 Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Demineralization of hard tooth tissue adjacent to resinmodified glass-ionomers and composite resins: a quantitative systematic review. J Oral Sci 2010;52(3):347-57.
54. 54 Dijkman GE, Arends J. Secondary caries in situ around fluoride-releasing light-curing composites: a quantitative model investigation on four materials with fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol%. Caries Res 1992;26(5):351-7.
55. 55 Jacobson APM, Strang R, Stephen KW. Effect of low fluoride levels in de/remineralization solutions of pH-cycling model. Caries Res 1991;25:230-1.
56. 56 Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9(5):195-8.
57. 57 Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Schulte-Mönting J. Three-year follow up assessment of class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001;14(3):148-52.
58. 58 Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, Van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract versus Tytin class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999;33(5):387-92.
59. 59 Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Eliades G. In vitro vs. in vivo anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2002;18(8):561-9.
60. 60 Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Am J Dent 2002;15(4):274-8.
61. 61 Lindberg A, Van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. 3-Year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in class II cavities. Am J Dent 2003;16(1):33-6.
62. 62 Van Dijken JW. A 6-year clinical evaluation of class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dent Mater 2003;19(5):423-8.
63. 63 Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991;170(5):177-81.
64. 64 Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130(10):1459-66.
65. 65 Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000;189(2):93-7.
66. 66 Kotsanos N. An intraoral study of caries induced on enamel in contact with fluoridereleasing restorative materials. Caries Res 2001;35(3):200-4.
67. 67 McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 2002;27(5):430-7.
68. 68 Hubel S, Mejare I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003:13(1):2-8.
69. 69 Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 2003;37(4):246-53.
70. 70 Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112(2):188-96.