A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 430-437

  McComb, D ^a,d   Erickson, R L ^b   Maxymiw, W G ^c   Wood, R E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d University of Toronto ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; FLUORIDE VARNISH; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC FIL; KETAC-FIL; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; VITREMER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; GEL; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RECURRENT DISEASE; SKULL IRRADIATION; TOOTH CERVIX; XEROSTOMIA;

ADULT; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CRANIAL IRRADIATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FLUORIDES, TOPICAL; GELS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MALEATES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RECURRENCE; ROOT CARIES; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTH CERVIX; XEROSTOMIA; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0036730120     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anneroth G, Holm LE & Karlsson G (1985) The effect of radiation on teeth. A clinical, histologic and microradiographic study International Journal of Oral Surgery 14(3) 269-274.
2. Brown LR, Dreizen S, Daly TE, Drane JB, Handler S, Riggan LJ & Johnston DA (1978) Interrelations of oral micro-organisms, immunoglobulins, and dental caries following radiotherapy Journal of Dental Research 57(9-10) 882-893.
3. Burgess JO (1998) Fluoride releasing materials - A critical review of in-vitro anti-caries effects. Published proceedings of the Academy of Dental Materials Conference on "Critical Reviews of Restorative Quandaries" Vol 12 151-176.
4. Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ, Hollis RA & Croll TP (1998) Release and uptake of fluoride from fluoride-containing dental materials Journal of Dental Research 77 Abstract #1088 pg 241.
5. el-Badrawy WA, McComb D & Wood RE (1993) Effect of home-use fluoride gels on glass ionomer and composite restorations Dental Materials 9(1) 63-67.
6. el-Badrawy WA & McComb D (1998) Effect of home-use fluoride gels on resin modified glass ionomer cements Operative Dentistry 23(1) 2-9.
7. Forsten L (1998) Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect Biomaterials 19(6) 503-508.
8. Griffin FD, Donly KJ & Erickson RL (1992) Caries inhibition by fluoride-releasing liners American Journal of Dentistry 5 293-295.
9. Jansma J, Vissink A, Gravenmade EJ, Visch LL, Fidler V & Retief DH (1989) In vivo study on the prevention of postradiation caries Caries Research 23(3) 172-178.
10. MacInnis WA, Ismail A & Brogan H (1991) Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 57(3) 227-231.
11. McComb D (1998) Caries prevention by fluoride releasing materials - A review of in-vivo evidence Published proceedings of the Academy of Dental Materials Conference on "Critical Reviews of Restorative Quandaries" Vol 12 179-199.
12. Mitra SB (1991a) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base Journal of Dental Research 70(1) 72-74.
13. Mitra SB (1991b) In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base Journal of Dental Research 70(1) 75-78.
14. Mjör IA (1986) Placement and replacement of restorations Operative Dentistry 6(2) 49-54.
15. Mjör IA (1996) Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report Quintessence International 27(3) 171-174.
16. Mjör IA (1997) The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 55(1) 58-63.
17. Myers RE & Mitchell DL (1988) Fluoride for the head and neck radiation patient Journal of Military Medicine 153(8) 411-413.
18. Nagamine M, Itota T, Torii Y, Irie M, Staninec M & Inoue K (1997) Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries American Journal of Dentistry 10 173-178.
19. Perrin C, Persin M & Sarrazin J (1994) A comparison of fluoride release from four glass-ionomer cement Quintessence International 25(9) 603-608.
20. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA & Wilson AD (1982) Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel Journal of Dental Research 61(12) 1416-1422.
21. Qvist V, Thylstrup A & Mjör IA (1986a) Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 44(6) 343-349.
22. Qvist V, Thylstrup A & Mjör IA (1986b) Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of resin restorations in Denmark Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 44(6) 351-356.
23. Relief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC & Switzer P (1984) Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement Caries Research 18(3) 250-257.
24. Souto M & Donly KJ (1993) Caries inhibition of photocured compared to chemical cured glass ionomers Journal of Dental Research 72 Abstract #1708 p 317.
25. Swartz ML, Phillips RW & Clarke HE (1984) Long-term F release from glass ionomer cements Journal of Dental Research 63(5) 158-160.
26. Swift EJ Jr (1986) An update on glass ionomer cements Quintessence International 19 125-130.
27. Thornton JB, Retief DH & Bradley EL (1986) Fluoride release from and tensile bond strength of Ketac-Fil and Ketac-Silver silver to enamel and dentine Dental Materials 2(6) 241-245.
28. Tyas MJ (1991) Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study Australian Dental Journal 36(3) 236-239.
29. Wilson AD & McLean JW (1988) Glass-Ionomer Cement p 119-121 Quintessence Pub Co Inc Chicago IL.
30. Wilson NH, Burke FJ & Mjör IA (1997) Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom Quintessence International 28(4) 245-248.
31. Wood RE, Maxymiw WG & McComb D (1993) A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class V caries in xerostomia head and neck cancer patients Operative Dentistry 18(3) 94-102.