Compomer materials and secondary caries formation

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 231-234

  Hicks, John ^a,b,c   García Godoy, Franklin ^d   Milano, Michael ^c   Flaitz, Catherine ^c  

^a TEXAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BISPHENOL A GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; DYRACT; FILTEK Z250; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; HYTAC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SALIVA SUBSTITUTE; SILICATE; SINGLE BOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DIFFUSION; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MICROPHOTOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; POLARIZATION MICROSCOPY; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DIFFUSION; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, POLARIZATION; PHOTOMICROGRAPHY; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SALIVA, ARTIFICIAL; SILICATES; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 0034305058     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Hals E, Andreassen BH, Bie T. Histopathology of natural caries around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res 1974;8:343-358.
2. Kidd EAM, Silverstone LM. Remineralization in vitro of artificial caries-like lesions produced in relation to amalgam restorations. Caries Res 1978;12:238-242.
3. Hicks MJ, Silverstone LM. Fissure sealants and dental enamel: A histological study of microleakage in vitro. Caries Res 1982;16:353-360.
4. Hicks MJ. Artificial lesion formation around glass ionomer restorations in root surfaces: A histologic study. Gerodontics 1986;2:108-114.
5. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int 1986;17:527-532.
6. Kidd EA, Toffenetti F, Mjör IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992;42:127-138.
7. García-Godoy F, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ. Secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations lined with a fluoridated dentin desensitizer. Am J Dent 1998;11:254-258.
8. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, et al. Restoration longevity and analysis for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999;20:234-242.
9. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
10. MacInnis WA, Ismail A, Brogan H. Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population. J Can Dent Assoc 1991;57:227-231.
11. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
12. Mjör IA, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:25-30.
13. Pimenta LAF, Navarro MFL, Consolaro A. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:219-222.
14. Pink FE, Minden NJ, Simmonds S. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Oper Dent 1994;19:127-132.
15. York AK, Arthur JS. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States navy dental corps. Oper Dent 1993;18:203-208.
16. White BA, Albertini TE, Brown LJ, et al. Selected restorations and tooth conditions: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:661-671.
17. Akerboom HBM, Advokaat JGA, Van Amerongen WE, et al. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:45-48.
18. Haugejorden O, Klock KS. The relative importance of reasons for tooth extraction in terms of potential tooth years of life lost (PYLL). Community Dent Health 1992;9:369-379.
19. Donly KJ. Enamel and dentin demineralization inhibition of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994;7:275-278.
20. Bertacchini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, et al. Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int 1999;30:193-197.
21. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glassionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-589.
22. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, et al. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1459-1466.
23. Hsu CYS, Donly KJ, Drake DR, et al. Effects of aged fluoride-containing restorative materials on recurrent root caries. J Dent Res 1998;77:418-425.
24. Eronat N, Kocatas N, Alpoz AR. A comparative study of fluoride uptake from dentin bonding agents and glass-ionomer cements in permanent and primary tooth enamel. Quintessence Int 1999;30:496-500.
25. EL-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1999;24:2-8.
26. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:222-225.
27. García-Godoy F, Chan DCN. Long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 1991;4:223-225.
28. ten Gate JM, Van Duinen RNB. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1266-1271.
29. Wandera A, García G. Comparative in vitro microradiographic effects of resin-modified and autopolymerized glass ionomers on demineralization of primary and permanent enamel. ASDC J Dent Child 1998:65:239-243.
30. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quintessence Int 1992;23:143-147.
31. García-Godoy F, Jensen ME. Artificial recurrent caries in glass-ionomer-lined amalgam restorations. Am J Dent 1990;3:89-93.
32. Tam LE, Chan GPL, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:4-14.
33. Varpio M, Nören JG. Artificial caries in primary and permanent teeth adjacent to composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:107-109.
34. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papagodiannis Y. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restoraions. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:511-519.
35. Swift Jr EJ. Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. Oper Dent 1989;14:40-43.
36. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotuou-Koubia E, et al. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Oper Dent 1994;19:183-188.
37. Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, et al. Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effects on dentin demineralization. J Dent Res 1999;78: 1647-1654.
38. Donly KJ, Gandgenett C. Dentin demineralization at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 1998;11:245-248.
39. Souto M, Donly KJ. Caries inhibition of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1994;7:22-124.
40. Mjör IA, Jokstad A. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cermet and resin-based composite materials. J Dent 1993;21:338-343.
41. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991;36:236-239.
42. Bynum AM, Donly KJ. Enamel de/remineralization of teeth adjacent to fluoride-releasing materials without dentifrice exposure. ASDC J Dent Child 1998;66:89-92.
43. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, et al. Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:817-825.
44. Kupietzky A, Houpt M, Mellberg J, et al. Fluoride exchange from glass ionomer preventive resin restorations. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:340-345.
45. Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeld HO. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Caries Res 1990;24:133-136.
46. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL, et al. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1992;27:280-284.
47. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, et al. Longevity and cariostatic effect of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: Three-year results. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-1396.
48. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: A 3-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992;26:315-318.
49. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Fluoride concentration in plaque adjacent to orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993;27:51-54.
50. Donly KJ, Nelson JJ. Fluoride release of restorative materials exposed to a fluoridated dentifrice. ASDC J Dent Child 1997;64:249-250.
51. Donly KJ, Kerber L. Demineralization inhibition at glass ionomer cement and amalgam restoration margins in conjunction with additional fluoride regimens. Spec Care Dent 1999;19:24-28.
52. Itota T, Okamoto M, Sato K, et al. Release and recharge of fluoride by restorative materials. Dent Mater J 1999;18:347-353.