Fluoride release and recharge behavior of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer compared with that of other fluoride releasing materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 372-378

  Mitra, Sumita B ^a   Oxman, Joe D ^b   Falsafi, Afshin ^b   Ton, Tiffany T ^b  

^a Mitra Chemical Consulting LLC   (United States)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE; GLASS; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

FLUORIDES; GLASS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESINS, SYNTHETIC;

EID: 84855641764     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-1390. (Pubitemid 38019463)
2. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater 2009;25:1302-1314.
3. Ketac Nano Light Curing Glass Ionomer Restorative Technical Product Profile. St. Paul, MN, USA: 3M ESPE Dental Products Division, 2007.
4. Kolb BU, Bui HT, Kangas LS, Oxman JD, Budd KD, Mitra SB. Dental compositions containing nanozirconia filler. 2010; US Patent 7, 649, 029.
5. Croll TP, Berg JH. Resin-modified glass ionomer restoration of primary molars with proximating Class II caries lesions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:372-376.
6. Croll TP, Donly KJ. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorative cement. Contemp Esthet 2007;11:14-17.
7. Killian CM, Croll TP. Nano-ionomer tooth repair in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2010;32:530-535.
8. Ripa LW, Leske GS, Levinson A. Supervised weekly rinsing with a 0.2% neutral NaF solution results from a demonstration program after two school years. JAm Dent Assoc 1978; 97: 793-798.
9. Burgess J, Norling BK, Rawls, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials-the continuum. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996; 17: 731-734.
10. Burgess JO. Fluoride-releasing materials and their adhesive characteristics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008; 29: 82-91.
11. Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JL, Nicholson JW, Berg JH, Simonsen RJ, Ngo HC. A revised classification for direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 691-697.
12. Tay WM, Braden M. Fluoride ion diffusion from polyalkenoate (glassionomer) cements. Biomaterials 1988; 9: 454-456.
13. Hörsted-Bindslev P, Larsen MJ. Release of fluoride from conventional and metal-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 451 -455.
14. Mitra SB. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer linerbase. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 75-78.
15. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light-activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1019-1023.
16. Wiegand A, Buchalla, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 343-362. (Pubitemid 46135733)
17. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:241-245.
18. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, Elkstrand J. Glass ionomer materials as rechargeable fluoride-release system. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997; 7: 65-73. (Pubitemid 127488508)
19. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resinmodified glass ionomers cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res 1997;31:275-280. (Pubitemid 127519864)
20. Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cury JA, ten Cate JM. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res 2009;43:97-102.
21. McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite rest(polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 430-437. (Pubitemid 41558771)
22. Haveman CW, Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Carlson K. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: A clinical comparison. J. Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 177-184. (Pubitemid 38175564)
23. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-881. (Pubitemid 41108347)
24. Ruiz JL, Mitra S, Using cavity liners with direct posterior composite restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006; 27: 347-351
25. Mitra SB, Rolf JC, Bui HT, Cummings KM, Randall R, Rusin RP. Effect of an RMGI liner on polymerization shrinkage of composites. J Dent Res 2008;87 (Sp Is A):(Abstr 1072).
26. Tenuta LM, Riberio CC, Goncalves NC, Del bel Cury AA, Aires CP, Tengan C, Tagliaferro EP, Percharki GD, Napimoga MH, Tabchoury CP, Cury JA. The short-term in situ model to evaluate the anticariogenic potential of ionomeric materials. J Dent 2005; 33: 491 -497.
27. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypennineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74: 1266-1271.
28. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:323-332. (Pubitemid 38271005)
29. Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31:403-408. (Pubitemid 44276627)
30. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in noncarious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008;24:915-922.
31. Philips RW. Glass ionomers boosting amalgam's value. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:159-160.
32. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resinmodified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:1110-1116. (Pubitemid 33609935)
33. Berg JH, Lin J-Y, Croll TP, Restorative Material choices for primary and young permanent molars. Contemporary Esthetics 2007; 11:26-36.
34. Boehm A, Broyles, BB, Falsafi A, Madsen VJ, Mitra SB, Peuker M, Oxman JD, Ton T. Comparative properties of RMGI nanoionomer restorative delivered via novel automix-capsule. J Dem Res 2010;87 (Sp Is A) (Abstr 92).
35. Falsafi A, Oxman JD, Ton T, Bui H, Mitra SB. A novel nano-ionomeric restorative with improved polish and wear-resistance. J Dent Res 2008;86 (SpIsA):(Abstr244).
36. Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer EA, Marks LA, De Moor RJ, De Witte AM, Trimpeneers LM. Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glassionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Biomaterials 1998;19:509-519. (Pubitemid 28246071)
37. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater 2000;16:166-171.
38. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials 2003;24:2451-2461. (Pubitemid 36407663)
39. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Multi-cured hybrid cements based on polyalkenoates and ion-leachable glasses. ACS Polyp Preprints 1997; 38:129-130. (Pubitemid 127545352)
40. Mitra SB. Photo curable glass ionomer cement systems. European patent application 0323120,1989.
41. Oxman JD, Mitra SB, Ton T, Bui HT, Falsafi A, Halvorson R, Lee C-Y, Wang Y. Mechanism of curing and interfacial bonding of RMGIs with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 2009;87: Sp Is A (Abstr 2325).
42. Wilson AD, Nicholson JW. Glass polyalkenoate cement (glass-ionomer) cement in acid-base cements: Their biomedical and industrial applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993;90-196.
43. Moreau JL, Xu HHK, Fluoride releasing restorative materials: Effect of pH on mechanical properties and ion release. Dent Mater 2010;26:e227-235.
44. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers"). Dent Mater 1999;15:196-201. (Pubitemid 129591112)
45. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release and uptake by aged resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite. Int Dent J 1999;49:217-225.
46. Preston AJ, Agalamnyi EA, Higham SM, Mair LH. The recharge of esthetic dental restorative materials with fluoride in vitro two years' results. Dent Mater 2003; 19:32-37.
47. Markovic DL, Petrovic BB, Petric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:21-24.
48. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. A long term study of fluoride release from metal-containing conventional and resin-modified glassionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2001 2001; 28: 41-47.
49. Donly KJ, Grandgenett C. Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 1998;11:245-248. (Pubitemid 128505211)
50. Ketac Nano Light Curing Glass Ionomer Restorative Technical Product Profile. St. Paul, MN, USA: 3M ESPE Dental Products Division, 2007.