Adapting and enhancing sequential profiling to understand the effects of successive ingestion, using the sensory characteristics of high intensity sweeteners as a case study

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 47, Issue , 2016, Pages 139-147

  Withers, Caroline ^a   Barnagaud, Christine ^a   Mehring, Phiala ^b   Ferris, Steve ^a   Thomson, David M H ^a  

^a MMR Research Worldwide Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b Sensory Science Centre MMR Research Worldwide Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Method development; Sequential profiling; Successive ingestion; Sweeteners; Temporal profiling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942297605     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Use of Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweeteners. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2004, 104:255-275. American Dietetic Association (ADA).
2. Cardello H.M.A.B., Da Silva M.A.P.A., Damasio M.H. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 1999, 54:119-129.
3. Cardoso J.M.P., Bolini H.M.A. Descriptive Profile of Peach Nectar Sweeteners with Sucrose and Different Sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 2008, 23:804-916.
4. Courregelongue S., Schlich P., Nobel A.C. Using repeated ingestion to determine the effect of sweetness, viscosity and oiliness on temporal perception of soymilk astringency. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:273-279.
5. Dijksterhuis G.B., Piggot J.R. Dynamic methods of sensory analysis. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2000, 11:284-290.
6. Saturated Fat and Energy Intake Programme 2008, Food Standards Agency, Food Standards Agency, London.
7. Foster K.D., Grigor J.M.V., Cheong J.N., Yoo M.J.Y., Bronlund J.E., Morgenstern M.P. The role of oral processing in dynamic sensory perception. Journal of Food Science 2011, 76:R49-R61.
8. Gater J., Zhao J., Barnagaud C., Ferris S. Sensory comparison of sugars versus high-intensity sweeteners in Ready-To-Drink Green Teas 2014, Poster presented at SenseAsia conference, Singapore.
9. Goyal S.K., Samsher L., Goyal R.K. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: A review. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 2010, 61:1-10.
10. Inanç A.L., Çinar I. An alternative natural sweetener: Stevia. GIDA - Journal of Food 2009, 34:411-415.
11. Hutchings S.C., Foster K.D., Grigor J.M.V., Bronlund J.E., Morgenstern M.P. Temporal dominance of sensations: A comparison between younger and older subjects for the perception of food texture. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:106-115.
12. Kroger M., Meister K., Kava R. Low-calorie sweeteners and other sugar substitutes: A Review of the safety issues. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2006, 5:35-47.
13. Labbe D., Schlich P., Pineau N., Gilbert F., Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: a comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:216-221.
14. Larsonpowers N., Pangborn R.M. Paired comparison and time-intensity measures of sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing surcrose or synthetic sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 1978, 43:41-46.
15. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
16. Lustig R.H., Schmidt L.A., Brindis C.D. Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 2012, 482:27-29.
17. Meillon S., Urbano C., Schlich P. Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:490-499.
18. Methven L., Rahelu K., Economou N., Kinneavy L., Ladbrooke-Davis L., Kennedy O.B., et al. The effect of consumption volume on profile and liking of oral nutritional supplements of varied sweetness: Sequential profiling and boredom tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:948-955.
19. Moussaoui K.A., Verela P. Exploring consumer product profiling technique and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1088-1099.
20. Nestle M. Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health 2013, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London. 3rd ed.
21. Newberne P.M., Conner M.W., Estes P. The influence of food additives and related materials on lower bowel structure and function. Toxicologic Pathology 1988, 16:184-197.
22. Ng M., Lawlor J.B., Chandra S., Chaya C., Hewson L., Hort J. Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25:121-134.
23. Ott D.B., Edwards C.L., Palmer S.J. Perceived taste intensity and duration of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in water using time-intensity (T-I) evaluations. Journal of Food Science 1991, 56:535-542.
24. Pawar R.S., Krynitsky A.J., Radar J.I. Sweeteners from plants - with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2013, 405:4397-4407.
25. Phillips K.C. Stevia: Steps in developing a new sweetener. Developments in sweeteners 1987, Elsevier, New York. T.H. Grenby (Ed.).
26. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonniere C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
27. Popkin B.M., Nielsen S.J. The Sweetening of the World's Diet. Obesity Research 2003, 11:1325-1332.
28. Portmann M.O., Kilcast D. Psychophysical characterization of new sweeteners of commercial importance for the EC food industry. Food Chemistry 1996, 56:291-302.
29. Roberts, M. W., Wright, J. T., (2012). Nonnutritive, Low Caloric Substitutes for Food Sugars: Clinical Implications for Addressing the Incidence of Dental Caries and Overweight/Obesity. International Journal of Dentistry, 625701.
30. Schiffman S.S., Satterly-Miller E.A., Bishay I.E. Time to maximum sweetness intensity of binary and ternary blends of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 16:405-415.
31. Sharma M., Thakral N.K., Thakral S. Chemistry and in vivo profile of ent-kaurene glycosides of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni - An overview. Natural Product Radiance 2009, 8:181-189.
32. Sokolowsky M., Fischer U. Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 2012, 732:46-52.
33. Świader K., Waszkiewicz-Robak B., Świderski F., Kostyra E. Sensory properties of some synthetic high-intensity sweeteners in water solutions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:2030-2038.
34. Tunaley A., Thomson D.M.H., McEwan J.A. Determination of equi-sweet concentrations of nine sweeteners using a relative rating technique. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 1987, 22:627-635.
35. Wallis K.J. Sucralose: Features and benefits. Food Australia 1993, 45:578-580.
36. Wiet S.G., Beyts P.K. Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 1992, 57:1014-1019.
37. Withers C.A., Lewis M.J., Gosney M.A., Methven L. Potential sources of mouth drying in beverage fortified with dairy proteins: A comparison of casein- and whey-rich ingredients. Journal of Dairy Science 2014, 97:1233-1347.
38. Zorn S., Alcaire F., Vidal L., Giménez A., Gastón A. Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:135-143.