Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies

European Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 713-720

  Arsov, Christian ^a   Rabenalt, Robert ^a   Blondin, Dirk ^a   Quentin, Michael ^a   Hiester, Andreas ^a   Godehardt, Erhard ^a   Gabbert, Helmut E ^a   Becker, Nikolaus ^b   Antoch, Gerald ^a   Albers, Peter ^a   Schimmöller, Lars ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging guided in bore prostate biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Randomized trial

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; KALLIKREIN; KALLIKREIN-RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN;

AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BIOPSY GUN; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HEALTH CARE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIKERT SCALE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDED IN BORE PROSTATE BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATITIS; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY; BLOOD; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR;

AGED; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; KALLIKREINS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84941806599     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. H. Serag, S. Banerjee, K. Saeb-Parsy, and et al. Risk profiles of prostate cancers identified from UK primary care using national referral guidelines Br J Cancer 106 2012 436 439
2. L. Cormio, V. Scattoni, F. Lorusso, and et al. Prostate cancer detection rates in different biopsy schemes. Which cores for which patients? World J Urol 32 2014 341 346
3. A.W. Nelson, R.C. Harvey, R.A. Parker, C. Kastner, A. Doble, and V.J. Gnanapragasam Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy PLoS One 8 2013 e57480
4. D. Volkin, B. Turkbey, A.N. Hoang, and et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers BJU Int 114 2014 E43 E49
5. Y. Komai, N. Numao, S. Yoshida, and et al. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy J Urol 190 2013 867 873
6. A. Heidenreich, P.J. Bastian, J. Bellmunt, and et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent - update 2013 Eur Urol 65 2014 124 137
7. M. Quentin, D. Blondin, J. Klasen, and et al. Evaluation of a structured report of functional prostate magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicion for prostate cancer or under active surveillance Urol Int 89 2012 25 29
8. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, C. Allen, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
9. L. Marks, S. Young, and S. Natarajan MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy Curr Opin Urol 23 2013 43 50
10. C. Arsov, D. Blondin, R. Rabenalt, G. Antoch, P. Albers, and M. Quentin Standardised scoring of a multi-parametric 3-T MRI for a targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy Urologe A 51 2012 848 856
11. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements, and et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur Radiol 22 2012 746 757
12. L. Schimmöller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy Eur Radiol 24 2014 2582 2589
13. L. Schimmöller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. Predictive power of the ESUR scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis verified with targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy Eur J Radiol 83 2014 2103 2108
14. C. Arsov, M. Quentin, R. Rabenalt, G. Antoch, P. Albers, and D. Blondin Repeat transrectal ultrasound biopsies with additional targeted cores according to results of functional prostate MRI detects high-risk prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsy and increased PSA - a pilot study Anticancer Res 32 2012 1087 1092
15. B.A. Hadaschik, T.H. Kuru, C. Tulea, and et al. A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion J Urol 186 2011 2214 2220
16. T. Franiel, C. Stephan, A. Erbersdobler, and et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding - multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning Radiology 259 2011 162 172
17. K. Engelhard, H.P. Hollenbach, B. Kiefer, A. Winkel, K. Goeb, and D. Engehausen Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device Eur Radiol 16 2006 1237 1243
18. C.M. Hoeks, M.G. Schouten, J.G. Bomers, and et al. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers Eur Urol 62 2012 902 909
19. Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013
20. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 66 2014 22 29
21. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, B. Turkbey, and et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 2015 390 397
22. B.K. Park, H.M. Lee, C.K. Kim, H.Y. Choi, and J.W. Park Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three Tesla before rebiopsy Invest Radiol 43 2008 789 793
23. D. Portalez, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, and et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients Eur Urol 62 2012 986 996
24. D.N. Costa, B.N. Bloch, D.F. Yao, and et al. Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies Magn Reson Imaging 31 2013 947 952
25. T. Durmus, C. Stephan, M. Grigoryev, and et al. Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography Rofo 185 2013 428 433
26. G.A. Sonn, E. Chang, S. Natarajan, and et al. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen Eur Urol 65 2014 809 815
27. J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, and et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection BJU Int 108 2011 E171 E178
28. M. Quentin, D. Blondin, C. Arsov, and et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen J Urol 192 2014 1374 1379
29. S. Loeb, A. Vellekoop, H.U. Ahmed, and et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 876 892
30. E. Anastasiadis, J. van der Meulen, and M. Emberton Hospital admissions after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a database analysis in England Int J Urol 22 2015 181 186
31. C.M. Moore, V. Kasivisvanathan, S. Eggener, and et al. Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group Eur Urol 64 2013 544 552