MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 43-50

  Marks, Leonard ^a   Young, Shelena ^a   Natarajan, Shyam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

MRIultrasound fusion; prostate cancer; prostate imaging; targeted biopsy

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE FUSION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84871242251     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835ad3ee     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Welch HG, Fisher ES, Gottlieb DJ, Barry MJ. Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare-SEER population during the PSA era. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1395-1400. (Pubitemid 351767186)
2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:66-70. (Pubitemid 19184005)
3. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:71-74; discussion 4-5.
4. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: Risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 2007; 178:S140YS149.
5. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW, et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010; 13:71-77.
6. Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, et al. The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: What happened in the last 20 years? J Urol 2004; 172:1297-1301. (Pubitemid 39249701)
7. Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, et al. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer 1993; 71:933-938. (Pubitemid 23049614)
8. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:746-757.
9. Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG, et al. Three-tesla magnetic resonanceguided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
10. Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, et al. Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
11. Hricak H, Williams RD, Spring DB, et al. Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141:1101-1110. (Pubitemid 14210836)
12. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: Multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011; 261:46-66.
13. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Kuroiwa K, et al. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol 2005; 174:2158-2163. (Pubitemid 41611764)
14. Schlaier JR, Warnat J, Dorenbeck U, et al. Image fusion of MR images and real-time ultrasonography: Evaluation of fusion accuracy combining two commercial instruments, a neuronavigation system and a ultrasound system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146:271-276; discussion 6-7.
15. Reynier C, Troccaz J, Fourneret P, et al. MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results. Med Phys 2004; 31:1568-1575. (Pubitemid 38808526)
16. Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P, et al. Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20:295-299. (Pubitemid 34791371)
17. Singh AK, Kruecker J, Xu S, et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2007; 101:841-845.
18. Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011; 186:1281-1285.
19. Miyagawa T, Ishikawa S, Kimura T, et al. Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol 2010; 17:855-860.
20. Ukimura O, Hirahara N, Fujihara A, et al. Technique for a hybrid system of realtime transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 2010; 17:890-893.
21. Ukimura O, Desai MM, Palmer S, et al. 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. J Urol 2012; 187:1080-1086. A phantom study evaluating MRIYultrasound fusion biopsy with the Urostation, a registration-based biopsy tracking device
22. Natarajan S, Marks LS, Margolis DJ, et al. Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol 2011; 29:334-342. Description of a system for grading lesions on prostate MRI and initial clinical results from targeted prostate biopsy
23. Bax J, Cool D, Gardi L, et al. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 2008; 35:5397-5410.
24. Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJA, et al. Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office-based MR-US fusion device. J Urol (in press).
25. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O, Osiri X. An open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imag 2004; 17:205-216. (Pubitemid 40378992)
26. Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, et al. High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 2012; 110:993-997.
27. Lawrentschuk N, Haider MA, Daljeet N, et al. 'Prostatic evasive anterior tumours': The role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 2010; 105:1231-1236.
28. Hossack T, Patel MI, Huo A, et al. Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy. J Urol 2012; 188:781-785.
29. Dall'era MA, Albertsen PC, Bangma C, et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
30. Adamy A, Yee DS, Matsushita K, et al. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2011; 185:477-482.
31. Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, et al. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: An evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2012; 188:762-767.
32. Margel D, Yap SA, Lawrentschuk N, et al. Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: A prospective cohort study. J Urol 2012; 187:1247-1252.