Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients

European Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 986-996

  Portalez, Daniel ^a   Mozer, Pierre ^b   Cornud, François ^c   Renard Penna, Raphaëlle ^b   Misrai, Vincent ^a   Thoulouzan, Matthieu ^d   Malavaud, Bernard ^d  

^a CLINIQUE PASTEUR   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Hôpital Cochin ^*  (France)

^d CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI functional; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF UROGENITAL RADIOLOGY SCORING SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84868596916     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. C.M. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, and T. Hambrock Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 2011 46 66
2. D. Portalez, G. Rollin, and P. Leandri Prospective comparison of T2w-MRI and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI, 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging or diffusion-weighted MRI in repeat TRUS-guided biopsies Eur Radiol 20 2010 2781 2790
3. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol 59 2011 61 71
4. S.W. Heijmink, J.J. Futterer, and S.S. Strum State-of-the-art uroradiologic imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer Acta Oncol 50 Suppl 1 2011 25 38
5. G. Giannarini, G. Petralia, and H.C. Thoeny Potential and limitations of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer including pelvic lymph node staging: a critical analysis of the literature Eur Urol 61 2012 326 340
6. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, and C. Allen Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
7. A.P.S. Kirkham, M. Emberton, and C. Allen How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol 50 2006 1163 1175 discussion 1175
8. J.C. Weinreb, J.D. Blume, and F.V. Coakley Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy - results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study Radiology 251 2009 122 133
9. A. Villers, L. Lemaitre, J. Haffner, and P. Puech Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance Curr Opin Urol 19 2009 274 282
10. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, and R. Clements ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur Radiol 22 2012 746 757
11. V. Molleran, and M.C. Mahoney The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18 2010 171 185 vii
12. M. Baumann, P. Mozer, V. Daanen, and J. Troccaz Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation Med Image Analysis 16 2012 562 576
13. F. Cornud, M. Rouanne, and F. Beuvon Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria? Eur J Radiol 81 2012 e591 e597
14. O. Ukimura, M.M. Desai, and S. Palmer 3-dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion J Urol 187 2012 1080 1086
15. R. Likert A technique for the measurement of attitudes Arch Psychol 140 1932 1 55
16. P. Harnden, B. Naylor, and M.D. Shelley The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: what are the risks of progression?. a systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer 112 2008 971 981
17. P.A. Pinto, P.H. Chung, and A.R. Rastinehad Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging J Urol 186 2011 1281 1285
18. G. Agrawal, M.Y. Su, O. Nalcioglu, S.A. Feig, and J.H. Chen Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon Cancer 115 2009 1363 1380
19. P. Rouse, G. Shaw, and H.U. Ahmed Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study Urol Int 87 2011 49 53
20. J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, and P. Puech Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection BJU Int 108 2011 E171 E178
21. S. Sclaverano, G. Chevreau, L. Vadcard, P. Mozer, and J. Troccaz BiopSym: a simulator for enhanced learning of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy Stud Health Technol Inform 142 2009 301 306
22. N. Lawrentschuk, A. Toi, and G.A. Lockwood Operator is an independent predictor of detecting prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy J Urol 182 2009 2659 2663
23. M.A. Levine, M. Ittman, J. Melamed, and H. Lepor Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer J Urol 159 1998 471 475 discussion 475-6
24. B. Djavan, M. Waldert, and A. Zlotta Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study J Urol 166 2001 856 860
25. S.L. Washington, M. Bonham, J.M. Whitson, J.E. Cowan, and P.R. Carroll Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer BJU Int 110 2012 50 55
26. M. Sinnott, S.M. Falzarano, and A.V. Hernandez Discrepancy in prostate cancer localization between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in patients with unilateral positive biopsy: implications for focal therapy Prostate 72 2012 1179 1186
27. J.B. Lattouf, and F. Saad Gleason score on biopsy: is it reliable for predicting the final grade on pathology? BJU Int 90 2002 694 698 discussion 698-9
28. K. De Laet, A. de la Taille, and G. Ploussard Predicting tumour location in radical prostatectomy specimens: same-patient comparisons of 21-sample versus sextant biopsy BJU Int 104 2009 616 620
29. C.S. McGill, J.A. Schwartz, J.Z. Moore, P.W. McLaughlin, and A.J. Shih Precision grid and hand motion for accurate needle insertion in brachytherapy Med Phys 38 2011 4749 4759
30. B.A. Hadaschik, T.H. Kuru, and C. Tulea A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion J Urol 186 2011 2214 2220
31. B. Turkbey, S. Xu, and J. Kruecker Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion BJU Int 107 2011 53 57
32. S. Natarajan, L.S. Marks, and D.J. Margolis Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system Urol Oncol 29 2011 334 342
33. T. Hambrock, D.M. Somford, and C. Hoeks Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen J Urol 183 2010 520 527