A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating pre-interventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion

Journal of Urology

Volumn 186, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2214-2220

  Hadaschik, Boris A ^a   Kuru, Timur H ^a   Tulea, Corina ^a   Rieker, Philip ^a   Popeneciu, Ionel V ^a   Simpfendörfer, Tobias ^a   Huber, Johannes ^a   Zogal, Pawel ^b   Teber, Dogu ^a   Pahernik, Sascha ^a   Roethke, Matthias ^b   Zamecnik, Patrik ^b,c   Roth, Wilfried ^a   Sakas, Georgios ^c   Schlemmer, Heinz Peter ^b   Hohenfellner, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c FRAUNHOFER IGD   (Germany)

Author keywords

biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOLECULAR PROBE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORGAN SIZE; PERINEUM HEMATOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE VOLUME; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 80755172261     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.102     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and J. Xu Cancer statistics, 2010 CA Cancer J Clin 60 2010 277
2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Prostate Cancer Early Detection V. 2.2010 www.nccn.org Accessed March 20, 2011
3. C.G. Roehrborn, G.L. Andriole, and T.H. Wilson Effect of dutasteride on prostate biopsy rates and the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and enlarged prostates in the Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin Trial Eur Urol 59 2011 244
4. J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, M.H. Wink, and C. Mamoulakis Optimizing prostate cancer detection: 8 versus 12-core biopsy protocol J Urol 182 2009 1329
5. J.C. Presti Jr, G.J. O'Dowd, and M.C. Miller Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study J Urol 169 2003 125
6. S. Eggener, G. Salomon, and P.T. Scardino Focal therapy for prostate cancer: possibilities and limitations Eur Urol 58 2010 57
7. H.U. Ahmed, A. Freeman, and A. Kirkham Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase I/II trial J Urol 185 2011 1246
8. W.E. Barzell, and M.R. Melamed Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostatea 4-year experience Urology 70 2007 27
9. G. Onik, M. Miessau, and D.G. Bostwick Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4321
10. B. Turkbey, P.A. Pinto, and H. Mani Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detectionhistopathologic correlation Radiology 255 2010 89
11. H.U. Ahmed, A. Kirkham, and M. Arya Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6 2009 197
12. A.G. Anastasiadis, M.P. Lichy, and U. Nagele MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies Eur Urol 50 2006 738
13. T. Hambrock, D.M. Somford, and C. Hoeks Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen J Urol 183 2010 520
14. K.M. Pondman, J.J. Ftterer, and B. ten Haken MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review Eur Urol 54 2008 517
15. T. Miyagawa, S. Ishikawa, and T. Kimura Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data Int J Urol 17 2010 855
16. A.K. Singh, J. Kruecker, and S. Xu Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy BJU Int 101 2008 841
17. B. Turkbey, S. Xu, and J. Kruecker Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion BJU Int 107 2011 53
18. O. Ukimura, N. Hirahara, and A. Fujihara Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy Int J Urol 17 2010 890
19. S. Xu, J. Kruecker, and B. Turkbey Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies Comput Aided Surg 13 2008 255
20. A.V. Taira, G.S. Merrick, and R.W. Galbreath Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13 2010 71
21. F.K.H. Chun, J.I. Epstein, and V. Ficarra Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature Eur Urol 58 2010 851
22. A.K. Singh, A. Krieger, and J.B. Lattouf Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner BJU Int 101 2008 181
23. D. Yakar, T. Hambrock, and H. Huisman Feasibility of 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy Invest Radiol 45 2010 121
24. G. Mller, H. Borrusch, and I. Knop Transrectal prostate biopsy: Effective anesthesia, complications, and influence on clinical outcome after radical prostatectomy Urologe A 50 2011 452
25. G.S. Merrick, W. Taubenslag, and H. Andreini The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping biopsy BJU Int 101 2008 1524
26. K. Engelhard, H.P. Hollenbach, and B. Kiefer Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device Eur Radiol 16 2006 1237
27. F. Abdollah, G. Novara, and A. Briganti Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 77 2011 921
28. J.L. Campos-Fernandes, L. Bastien, and N. Nicolaiew Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy Eur Urol 55 2009 600
29. B. Turkbey, V.P. Shah, and Y. Pang Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology 258 2011 488