Detection of prostate cancer by real-time mr/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3t mri and state of the art sonography;Detektion des Prostatakarzinoms durch Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie: 3T MRT und moderne Ultraschalltechnik

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 428-433

  Durmus, T ^a   Stephan, C ^a   Grigoryev, M ^a   Diederichs, G ^a   Saleh, M ^a   Slowinski, T ^a   Maxeiner, A ^a   Thomas, A ^a   Fischer, T ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

detection rate; fusion biopsy; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; sonography

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REPEAT PROCEDURE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AGED; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84876784862     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330704     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Djavan B., Ravery V., Zlotta A. et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol: 2001; 166 1679 1683
2. Presti J. C. Jr. Repeat prostate biopsy - when, where, and how. Urol Oncol: 2009; 27 312 314
3. Dang C. V., Semenza G. L. Oncogenic alterations of metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci: 1999; 24 68 72 (Pubitemid 29346576)
4. Frauscher F., Pallwein L., Klauser A. et al. Ultraschallkontrastmittel und Prostatakarzinom. Radiologe: 2005; 45 544 551 (Pubitemid 40941788)
5. Fischer T., Paschen C. F., Slowinski T. et al. Differentiation of parotid gland tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2010; 182 155 162
6. Pallwein L., Mitterberger M., Gradl J. et al. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol: 2007; 17 39 47 (Pubitemid 44901089)
7. Lorenzen J., Sinkus R., Adam G. Elastographie: Quantitative Bildgebung der elastischen Gewebeeigenschaften. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2003; 175 623 630 (Pubitemid 36753031)
8. Yan Z., Jie T., Yan-Mi L. et al. Role of transrectal real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao: 2011; 33 175 179
9. Nelson E. D., Slotoroff C. B., Gomella L. G. et al. Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology: 2007; 70 1136 1140 (Pubitemid 350297373)
10. Franiel T. Multiparametrische Magnetresonanztomografie der Prostata - Technik und klinische Anwendungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2011; 183 607 617
11. Schlemmer H. P. Multiparametrische MRT der Prostata: Methode zur Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms? Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2010; 182 1067 1075
12. Gemeinhardt O., Ludemann L., Prochnow D. et al. Differentiation of prostate cancer from normal prostate tissue in an animal model: conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 935 939 (Pubitemid 40977362)
13. Beyersdorff D., Hamm B. MRT zur Problemlösung beim Nachweis des Prostatakarzinoms. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2005; 177 788 795 (Pubitemid 40873820)
14. Zangos S., Eichler K., Thalhammer A. et al. Aktueller Stand der MR-gesteuerten Prostata-Interventionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2010; 182 947 953
15. Sosna J., Pedrosa I., Dewolf W. C. et al. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Acad Radiol: 2004; 11 857 862 (Pubitemid 39006232)
16. Scheidler J., Weores I., Brinkschmidt C. et al. Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with persistently elevated PSA and tumor-negative biopsy in ambulatory care: performance of MR imaging in a multi-reader environment. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2012; 184 130 135
17. Miyagawa T., Ishikawa S., Kimura T. et al. Real-time Virtual Sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol: 2010; 17 855 860
18. Serkin F. B., Soderdahl D. W., Cullen J. et al. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7. Urol Oncol: 2010; 28 302 307
19. Hambrock T., Somford D. M., Hoeks C. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol: 2010; 183 520 527
20. Roethke M., Anastasiadis A. G., Lichy M. et al. MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy. World J Urol: 2011
21. Moussa A. S., Meshref A., Schoenfield L. et al. Importance of additional "extremeo" anterior apical needle biopsies in the initial detection of prostate cancer. Urology: 2010; 75 1034 1039
22. Ouzzane A., Puech P., Lemaitre L. et al. Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology: 2011; 78 1356 1362
23. Stadlbauer A., Bernt R., Salomonowitz E. et al. Gesundheitsö konomische Evaluation der Magnetresonanzbildgebung im Staging von Prostatakarzinomen für Österreich und Deutschland. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2012; 184 556 564
24. Stadlbauer A., Bernt R., Salomonowitz E. et al. Gesundheitsö konomische Evaluation einer Magnetresonanzbildgebung vor Biopsie zur Diagnose von Prostatakarzinomen. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2011; 183 925 932