Prostate cancer detection rates in different biopsy schemes. Which cores for which patients?

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 341-346

  Cormio, Luigi ^a   Scattoni, Vincenzo ^b   Lorusso, Fabrizio ^a   Perrone, Antonia ^a   Di Fino, Giuseppe ^a   Selvaggio, Oscar ^a   Sanguedolce, Francesca ^a   Bufo, Pantaleo ^a   Montorsi, Francesco ^b   Carrieri, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Prostate biopsy; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

KALLIKREIN; KALLIKREIN RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN; KALLIKREIN-RELATED PEPTIDASE 3, HUMAN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; COHORT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; TUMOR VOLUME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; KALLIKREINS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84897029609     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0989-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1989) Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 142: 66-70.
2. Terris MK, Wallen EM, Stamey TA (1997) Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. Urol Int 59: 239-242.
3. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R et al (2007) Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 52: 1309-1322.
4. Siu W, Dunn RL, Shah RB et al (2005) Use of extended pattern technique for initial prostate biopsy. J Urol 174: 505-509.
5. Guichard G, Larré S, Gallina A et al (2007) Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 52: 430-435.
6. Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F et al (2010) Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting 95 % of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol 57: 1-8.
7. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J et al (2006) Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 175: 1605-1612.
8. Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L et al (2006) Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol 175: 485-488.
9. Pepe P, Aragona F (2007) Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. Urology 70: 1131-1135.
10. Heidenreich A, M. Bolla M, S. Joniau S, et al. (2010). Guidelines on prostate cancer. EAU Guidelines: 16.
11. Cormio L, Pagliarulo V, Lorusso F et al (2012) Combined perianal-intrarectal (PI) lidocaine-prilocaine (LP) cream and lidocaine-ketorolac gel provide better pain relief than combined PI LP cream and periprostatic nerve block during transrectal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 109: 1776-1780.
12. Delongchamps NB, de la Roza G, Jones R et al (2009) Saturation biopsies on autopsied prostates for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer. BJU Int 103: 49-54.
13. Ravery V, Dominique S, Panhard X et al (2008) The 20-core prostate biopsy protocol-a new gold standard? J Urol 179: 504-507.
14. Djavan B (2006) Prostate biopsies and vienna nomograms. Eur Urol Suppl 5: 500-510.
15. Ficarra V, Novella G, Novara G et al (2005) The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 48: 932-937.
16. Inahara M, Suzuki H, Kojima S et al (2006) Improved prostate cancer detection using systematic 14-core biopsy for large prostate glands with normal digital rectal examination findings. Urology 68: 815-819.
17. Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C et al (2004) An extended 10-core ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 45: 444-448.