Microtubule C-Terminal Tails Can Change Characteristics of Motor Force Production

Traffic

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1075-1087

  Shojania Feizabadi, Mitra ^a,b   Janakaloti Narayanareddy, Babu Reddy ^b   Vadpey, Omid ^b   Jun, Yonggun ^b   Chapman, Dail ^b   Rosenfeld, Steven ^c   Gross, Steven P ^b  

^a SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

C terminal; Eg5; Force production; Kinesin 1; Microtubule

Indexed keywords

KINESIN; KINESIN 1; KINESIN 5; TUBULIN; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BOVINE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME; FORCE; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR TRANSPORT; MCF 7 CELL LINE; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; VELOCITY; ANIMAL; KINETICS; MCF-7 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; HUMANS; KINESIN; KINETICS; MCF-7 CELLS; MICROTUBULES; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; TUBULIN;

EID: 84941600018     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tra.12307     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Block SM, Goldstein LS, Schnapp BJ. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature 1990;348:348-352.
2. Vale RD. The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell 2003;112:467-480.
3. Svoboda K, Schmidt CF, Schnapp BJ, Block SM. Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry. Nature 1993;365:721-727.
4. Vale RD, Funatsu T, Pierce DW, Romberg L. Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature 1996;380:451-453.
5. Valentine MT, Fordyce PM, Krzysiak TC, Gilbert SP, Block SM. Individual dimers of the mitotic kinesin motor eg5 step processively and support substantial loads in vitro. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:470-476.
6. Crevel IM, Lockhart A, Cross RA. Kinetic evidence for low chemical processivity in ncd and Eg5. J Mol Biol 1997;273:160-170.
7. Rosenfeld SS, Xing J, Jefferson GM, King PH. Docking and rolling-a model of how the mitotic motor Eg5 works. J Biol Chem 2005;280:35684-35695.
8. Svoboda K, Block SM. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell 1994;77:773-784.
9. Mattson-Hoss MK, Niitani Y, Gordon EA, Jun Y, Bardwell L, Tomishige M, Gross SP. CK2 activates kinesin via induction of a conformational change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:7000-7005.
10. Visscher K, Schnitzer MJ, Block SM. Single kinesin molecules studied with a molecular force clamp. Nature 1999;400:184-189.
11. Goulet A, Major J, Jun Y, Gross SP, Rosenfeld SS, Moores CA. A comprehensive structural model of the mechanochemical cycle of a mitotic motor highlights molecular adaptations in the kinesin family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:1837-1842.
12. Kaan HY, Major J, Tkocz K, Kozielski F, Rosenfeld SS. Snapshots of ispinesib-induced conformational changes in the mitotic kinesin Eg5. J Biol Chem 2013;288:18588-18598.
13. Goulet A, Behnke-Parks WM, Sindelar CV, Major J, Rosenfeld SS, Moores CA. The structural basis of force generation by the mitotic motor kinesin-5. J Biol Chem 2012;287:44654-44666.
14. Turner J, Anderson R, Guo J, Beraud C, Fletterick R, Sakowicz R. Crystal structure of the mitotic kinesin Eg5 reveals a novel conformation of the neck-linker. J Biol Chem 2001;276:25496-25502.
15. Ogawa T, Nitta R, Okada Y, Hirokawa N. A common mechanism for microtubule destablilizer-M type kinesins stabilize curling of the protofilament using the class-specific neck and loops. Cell 2004;116:591-602.
16. Zhang D, Asenjo AB, Grrebaum M, Xie L, Sharp DJ, Sosa H. A second tubulin binding site on the kinesin-13 motor head domain is important during mitosis. PLoS One 2013;8:e73075.
17. Soppina V, Verhey KJ. The family-specific K-loop influences the microtubule on-rate but not the superprocessivity of kinesin-3 motors. Mol Biol Cell 2014;25:2161-2170.
18. Waitzman JS, Larson AG, Cochran JC, Naber N, Cooke R, Jon Kull F, Pate E, Rice SE. The loop 5 element structurally and kinetically coordinates dimers of the human kinesin-5, Eg5. Biophys J 2011;101:2760-2769.
19. Walter WJ, Beranek V, Fischermeier E, Diez S. Tubulin acetylation alone does not affect kinesin-1 velocity and run length in vitro. PLoS One 2012;7:e42218.
20. Kaul N, Soppina V, Verhey KJ. Effects of a-tubulin K40 acetylation and detyrosination on kinesin-1 motility in a purified system. Biophys J 2014;106:2636-2643.
21. Herms A, Bosch M, Reddy B, Schieber NL, Fajardo A, Ruperez C, Fernandez-Vidal A, Ferguson C, Rentero C, Tebar F, Enrich C, Patron RG, Gross SP, Pol A. AMPK activation promotes lipid droplet dispersion on detyrosinated microtubules to increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Nat Commun 2015;27:7176-7190.
22. Konishi Y, Setou M. Tubulin tyrosination navigated the kinesin-1 motor domain to axons. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:559-567.
23. Barisic M, Silvia e Sousa R, Tripathy SK, Magiera MM, Zaytsev AV, Pereira AL, Janke C, Grishchuk EL, Maiato H. Mitosis: microtubule detyrosination guides chromosomes during mitosis. Science 2015;348:799-803.
24. Peris L, Wagenbach M, Lafanechere L, Brocard J, Moore AT, Kozielski F, Job D, Wordeman L, Andrieux A. Motor-dependent microtubule disassembly driven by tubulin tyrosination. J Cell Biol 2009;185:1159-1166.
25. Dunn S, Morrison EE, Liverpool TB, Molina-Paris C, Cross RA, Alonso MC, Peckham M. Differential trafficking of Kif5c on tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules in live cells. J Cell Sci 2008;121:1085-1095.
26. Sirajuddin M, Rice LM, Vale RD. Regulation of microtubule motors by tubulin isotypes and post-translational modifications. Nat Cell Biol 2014;16:335-344.
27. Mallik R, Gross SP. Intracellular transport: how do motors work together. Curr Biol 2009;19:R416-R418.
28. Shubeita G, Tran S, Xu J, Vershinin M, Cermelli S, Cotton S, Welte M, Gross SP. Consequences of motor copy number on the intracellular transport of kinesin-1-driven lipid droplets. Cell 2008;135:1098-1107.
29. Hendricks AG, Holzbaur EL, Goldman YE. Force measurements on cargoes in living cells reveal collective dynamics of microtubule motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:18447-18452.
30. Leidel C, Longoria RA, Gutierrez FM, Shubeita G. Measuring molecular motor forces in vivo: implications for Tug of War models of bidirectional transport. Biophys J 2012;103:492-500.
31. Rai AK, Rai A, Ramaiya AJ, Jha R, Mallik R. Molecular adaptations allow dynein to generate large collective forces inside cells. Cell 2013;152:172-182.
32. Kunwar A, Tripathy SK, Xu J, Mattson MK, Anand P, Sigua R, Vershinin M, McKenney RJ, Yu CC, Mogilner A, Gross SP. Mechanical stochastic tug-of-war models cannot explain bidirectional lipid-droplet transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:18960-18965.
33. McKenney RJ, Vershinin M, Kunwar A, Vallee RB, Gross SP. LIS1 and NudE induce a persistent dynein force-producing state. Cell 2010;141:304-314.
34. Xu J, Shu Z, King SJ, Gross SP. Tuning multiple motor travel via single motor velocity. Traffic 2012;13:1198-1205.
35. Feizabadi MS, Jun Y. Kinesin-1 translocation: surprising differences between bovine brain and MCF7-derived microtubules. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014;454:543-546.
36. Duselder A, Thiede C, Schmidt CF, Lakamper S. Neck-linker length dependence of processive kinesin-5 motility. J Mol Biol 2012;423:159-168.
37. Lakamper S, Thiede C, Duselder A, Reiter S, Korneer MJ, Kapitein LC, Peterman EJG, Schmidt CF. The effect of monastrol on the processive motility of dimeric kinesin-5 head/kinesin-1 stalk chimera. J Mol Biol 2010;339:1-8.
38. Shastry S, Hancock WO. Interhead tension determines processivity across diverse N-terminal kinesins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:16253-16258.
39. Kunwar A, Vershinin M, Xu J, Gross SP. Stepping, strain gating, and an unexpected force velocity curve for multiple-motor-based transport. Curr Biol 2008;18:1173-1183.
40. Vershinin M, Carter BC, Razafsky DS, King SJ, Gross SP. Multiple-motor based transport and its regulation by Tau. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:87-92.
41. Banerjee A, Luduena RF. Kinetics of colchicine binding to purified b-tubulin isotypes from bovine brain. J Biol Chem 1992;267:13335-13339.
42. Davis A, Martinez S, Nelson D, Middleton K. A tubulin polymerization microassay used to compare ligand efficacy. Methods Cell Biol 2010;95:327-347.
43. Wang Z, Sheetz MP. The C-terminus of tubulin increases cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin processivity. Biophys J 2000;78:1955-1964.
44. Jamison DK, Driver JW, Rogers AR, Constantinou PE, Diehl MR. Two kinesins transport cargo primarily via the action of one motor: implications for intracellular transport. Biophys J 2010;99:2967-2977.
45. Driver JW, Jamison DK, Uppulury K, Rogers AR, Kolomeisky AB, Diehl MR. Productive cooperation among processive motors depends inversely on their mechanochemical efficiency. Biophys J 2011;101:386-395.
46. Klumpp S, Lipowsky R. Cooperative cargo transport by several molecular motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:17284-17289.
47. Mallik R, Carter BC, Lex SA, King SJ, Gross SP. Cytoplasmic dynein functions as a gear in response to load. Nature 2004;427:649-652.
48. Mallik R, Petrov D, Lex SA, King SJ, Gross SP. Building complexity: an in vitro study of cytoplasmic dynein with in vivo implications. Curr Biol 2005;15:2075-2085.
49. Jun Y, Tripathy SK, Narayanareddy BRJ, Mattson-Hoss MK, Gross SP. Calibration of optical tweezers for in vivo force measurements: how do different approaches compare?" Biophys J 2014;107:1474-1484.