Temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) as a sensory profiling technique

Rapid Sensory Profiling Techniques and Related Methods: Applications in New Product Development and Consumer Research

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 269-306

  Pineau, N ^a   Schilch, P ^b  

^a NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

^b CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

Author keywords

Dominance; Panel performance; Panel training; TDS data analysis; Temporal dominance of sensations

Indexed keywords

DOMINANCE; PANEL PERFORMANCE; SENSORY PROFILING; TEMPORAL DOMINANCE OF SENSATIONS;

EID: 84941570512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781782422587.2.269     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Albert A., Salvador A., Schlich P., Fiszman S. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24(1):111-118.
2. Barron D., Pineau N., Matthey-Doret W., Ali S., Sudre J., Germain J.C., Kolodziejczyk E., Pollien P., Labbe D., Jarisch C., Dugas V., Hartmann C., Folmer B. Impact of crema on the aroma release and the in-mouth sensory perception of espresso coffee. Food and Function 2012, 3(9):923-930.
3. Bouteille R., Cordelle S., Laval C., Tournier C., Lecanu B., This H., Schlich P. Sensory exploration of the freshness sensation in plain yoghurts and yoghurt-like products. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30(2):282-292.
4. Bruzzone F., Ares G., Gimenez A. Temporal aspects of yoghurt texture perception. International Dairy Journal 2013, 29(2):124-134.
5. Dinnella C., Masi C., Zoboli G., Monteleone E. Sensory functionality of extravirgin olive oil in vegetable foods assessed by temporal dominance of sensations and descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26(2):141-150.
6. Dinnella C., Masi C., Naes T., Monteleone E. A new approach in TDS data analysis: A case study on sweetened coffee. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30(1):33-46.
7. Dugas V., Pineau N., Folmer B. Evaluating whole cup experience in gourmet espresso coffee by using dynamic methods 2012.
8. Hutchings S.C., Foster K.D., Grigor J.M.V., Bronlund J.E., Morgenstern M.P. Temporal dominance of sensations: A comparison between younger and older subjects for the perception of food texture. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:106-115.
9. ISO, 8586, Sensory analysis - General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected and expert assessors.
10. ISO, 8589, Sensory analysis - General guidance for the design of test rooms.
11. Kiemele J., Schmidt S., Berdine R. Basic Statistics, Tools for Continuous Improvement 1995, Air Academy Press, Colorado Springs, USA. 4th edn.
12. Labbe D., Schlich P., Pineau N., Gilbert F., Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:216-221.
13. Laguna L., Varela P., Salvador A., Fiszman S. A new sensory tool to analyse the oral trajectory of biscuits with different fat and fibre contents. Food Research International 2013, 51(2):544-553.
14. Lannuzel C., Rogeaux M. How to speed up Temporal Dominance of Sensations Training 2007, Seventh Pangborn symposium, p 84.
15. Lenfant F., Loret C., Pineau N., Hartmann C., Martin N. Perception of oral food breakdown: The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 2009, 52:659-667.
16. Lepage M., Neville T., Rytz A., Schlich P., Martin N., Pineau N. Panel performance for Temporal Dominance of Sensations. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 38:24-29.
17. Le Révérend F.M., Hidrio C., Fernandes A., Aubry V. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations and time intensity results. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:174-178.
18. Meillon S., Urbano C., Schlich P. Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:490-499.
19. Meillon S., Viala D., Medel M., Urbano C., Guillot G., Schlich P. Impact of partial alcohol reduction in Syrah wine on perceived complexity and temporality of sensations and link with preference. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(7):732-740.
20. Meyners M. Panel and panellist agreement for product comparisons in studies of Temporal Dominance of Sensations. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(4):365-370.
21. Meyners M., Pineau N. Statistical inference for temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) data. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(7):805-814.
22. Neilson A.J. Time-intensity studies. Flavor Research and Food Acceptance 1958, 88-93. Reinhold Publ. Corp, New York. C. Nieman (Ed.).
23. Ng M., Lawlor J.B., Chandra S., Chaya C., Hewson L., Hort J. Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25(2):121-134.
24. Pangborn R.M., Chrisp R.B. Taste interrelationships VI: Sucrose, sodium chloride, and citric acid in canned tomato juice. Journal of Food Science 1964, 29:490-498.
25. Paulsen M.T., Naes T., Ueland O., Rukke E.-O., Hersleth M. Preference mapping of salmon-sauce combinations: The influence of temporal properties. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27(2):120-127.
26. Pecore, Rathjen-Nowak, Tamminen 2011. Tenth Pangborn Symposium , Toronto, Canada.
27. Pessina R., Boivin L., Moio L., Schlich P. Application of TDS to taste and flavor in wine 2005.
28. Pessina R. Temporal dominance of taste and flavour of wine 2006, Available from:, Dijon/Università degli studi, Foggia, Thesis, ENSBANA. http://www.sudoc.fr/109217985.
29. Pineau N., Cordelle S., Schlich P. Temporal dominance of sensations: A new technique to record several sensory attributes simultaneously over time 2003.
30. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonnière C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., Rogeaux M., Etiévant P., Köster E. Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
31. Pineau N., Goupil de Bouillé A., Lepage M., Lenfant F., Schlich P., Martin N., Rytz A. Temporal Dominance of Sensations: What is a good attribute list?. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:159-165.
32. Pineau N., Glérum A., Robin T., Thémans M., Martin N., Bierlaire M., Rytz A. TDS: Is it possible to reduce panel size without changing the quality of the results? 2009. Eighth Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium , 26-30 July, O5.3.
33. Rosenthal J., Share C. Temporal dominance of sensations of peanuts and peanut products in relation to Hutchings and Lillford's "breakdown path". Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32:311-316.
34. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics 1995, Duxbury Press, Belmont, Chapters 4-7. 4th edn.
35. Saint-Eve A., Lenfant F., Teillet E., Pineau N., Martin N. Impact of panel training, attribute list, type of response and dominance definition on TDS response 2011. 9th Pangborn sensory symposium Toronto, Canada, P1.9.06.
36. Schlich P. L'analyse en variables canoniques des donn é es de profi l sensoriels. Eighth European Symposium of Agro-Industry and Statistical Methods , Rennes.
37. Sudre J., Pineau N., Loret C., Martin N. Comparison of methods to monitor liking of food during consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24(1):179-189.
38. Teillet E., Schlich P., Urbano C., Cordelle S., Guichard E. Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(8):967-976.
39. Thomas A., Visalli M., Cordelle S., Schlich P. Temporal Drivers of Liking. Food Quality and Preference 2014, In Press, Available online 21 March 2014.
40. Varela P., Pintor A., Fiszman S. How hydrocolloids affect the temporal oral perception of ice cream. Food Hydrocolloids 2014, 36:220-228.