Panel and panelist agreement for product comparisons in studies of Temporal Dominance of Sensations

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 365-370

  Meyners, Michael ^a,b  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Panel agreement; Panelist agreement; Permutation tests; Product differences; Randomization tests; Statistical inference; Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS)

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 79952190059     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bi J. Agreement and reliability assessment for performance of sensory descriptive panel. Journal of Sensory Studies 2003, 18:61-76.
2. Brockhoff P.B. Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:425-434.
3. Edgington E., Onghena P. Randomization tests 2007, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 4th ed.
4. Goupil de Bouillé A., Pineau N., Meyners M., Martin N., Schlich P. How do panellists use the list of attributes during a Temporal Dominance of Sensations experiment?. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23-26, 2010 2010, pp. 179-186, Academy School, Afragola (Na).
5. Gower J.C. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-51.
6. Kermit M., Lengard V. Assessing the performance of a sensory panel-panellist monitoring and tracking. Journal of Chemometrics 2005, 19:154-161.
7. Lee H.S., van Hout D., Hautus M.J. Comparison of performance in the A-Not A, 2-AFC, and same-different tests for the flavor discrimination of margarines: The effect of cognitive decision strategies. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:920-928.
8. Lenfant F., Loret C., Pineau N., Hartmann C., Martin N. Perception of oral food breakdown: the concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 2009, 52:659-667. corrigendum in Appetite 53, 473.
9. Mangan P.A.P. Performance assessment of sensory panelists. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:229-252.
10. McEwan J.A., Hunter E.A., van Gemert L.J., Lea P. Proficiency testing for sensory profile panels: measuring panel performance. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:181-190.
11. Meyners M. On the design, analysis and interpretation of TDS data. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23-26, 2010 2010, (pp. 45-53), Academy School, Afragola (Na).
12. Meyners M., Pineau N. Statistical inference for Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) data. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:805-814.
13. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonnière C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., et al. Temporal Dominance of Sensations. Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
14. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, <>. http://www.R-project.org.