A database of force-field parameters, dynamics, and properties of antimicrobial compounds

Molecules

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 13997-14021

  Malloci, Giuliano ^a   Vargiu, Attilio Vittorio ^a   Serra, Giovanni ^a   Bosin, Andrea ^a   Ruggerone, Paolo ^a   Ceccarelli, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

All atom force fields; Antimicrobial compounds; Molecular databases; Molecular dynamics simulations

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

CHEMICAL DATABASE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTUM THEORY; THERMODYNAMICS;

ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; DATABASES, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; QUANTUM THEORY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84941254912     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14203049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/molecules200813997     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Csermely, P.; Palotai, R.; Nussinov, R. Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: An extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 539-546.
2. Baron, R.; McCammon, J.A. Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013, 64, 151-175.
3. Jorgensen, W. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science 2004, 303, 1813-1818.
4. Gilson, M.K.; Zhou, H.X. Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36, 21-42.
5. Baron, R.; McCammon, J.A. Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013, 64, 151-175.
6. Vargiu, A.V.; Magistrato, A. Atomistic-Level Portrayal of Drug-DNA Interplay: A History of Courtships and Meetings Revealed by Molecular Simulations. ChemMedChem 2014, 9, 1966-1981.
7. Boehr, D.D.; Nussinov, R.; Wright, P.E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 789-796.
8. Van Gunsteren, W.F.; Bakowies, D.; Baron, R.; Chandrasekhar, I.; Christen, M.; Daura, X.; Gee, P.; Geerke, D.P.; Glaettli, A.; Huenenberger, P.H.; et al. Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4064-4092.
9. Sherwood, P.; Brooks, B.R.; Sansom, M.S.P. Multiscale methods for macromolecular simulations. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2008, 18, 630-640.
10. Cheatham, T.E., III; Case, D.A. Twenty-Five Years of Nucleic Acid Simulations. Biopolymers 2013, 99, 969-977.
11. Lee, E.H.; Hsin, J.; Sotomayor, M.; Comellas, G.; Schulten, K. Discovery through the Computational Microscope. Structure 2009, 17, 1295-1306.
12. Amodeo, G.F.; Scorciapino, M.A.; Messina, A.; De Pinto, V.; Ceccarelli, M. Charged residues distribution modulates selectivity of the open state of human isoforms of the voltage dependent anion-selective channel. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103879.
13. Dodson, G.G.; Lane, D.P.; Verma, C.S. Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: New windows on mechanisms in biology. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 144-150.
14. Dror, R.O.; Dirks, R.M.; Grossman, J.P.; Xu, H.; Shaw, D.E. Biomolecular Simulation: A Computational Microscope for Molecular Biology. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 2012, 41, 429-452.
15. Karplus, M.; Lavery, R. Significance of Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Life Sciences. Isr. J. Chem. 2014, 54, 1042-1051.
16. Mortier, J.; Rakers, C.; Bermudez, M.; Murgueitio, M.S.; Riniker, S.; Wolber, G. The impact of molecular dynamics on drug design: Applications for the characterization of ligand-macromolecule complexes. Drug Discov. Today 2015, 20, 686-702.
17. Schlick, T. Molecular Modeling and Simulation: An Interdisciplinary Guide; Interdisciplinary applied mathematics, Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
18. Gelin, B.R. Testing and comparison of empirical force fields: Techniques and problems. In Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems: Theoretical and Experimental Applications; Gunsteren, W.F.V., Weiner, P., Wilkinson, A.J., Eds.; ESCOM: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993; Volume 2, pp. 127-146.
19. Cornell, W.D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C.I.; Gould, I.R.G.; Merz, K.M.J.; Ferguson, D.M.; Spellmeyer, D.C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J.W.; Kollman, P.A. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197.
20. Ceccarelli, M.; Lutz, M.; Marchi, M. A density functional normal mode calculation of a bacteriochlorophyll a derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3532-3533.
21. Ceccarelli, M.; Marchi, M. Simulation and Modeling of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides Bacterial Reaction Center II: Primary Charge Separation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5630-5641.
22. Piana, S.; Klepeis, J.L.; Shaw, D.E. Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: Quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 24, 98-105.
23. Šponer, J.; Banáš, P.; Jurečka, P.; Zgarbová, M.; Kührová, P.; Havrila, M.; Krepl, M.; Stadlbauer, P.; Otyepka, M. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids. From Tetranucleotides to the Ribosome. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1771-1782.
24. Schmidt, T.H.; Kandt, C. LAMBADA and InflateGRO2: Efficient Membrane Alignment and Insertion of Membrane Proteins for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Mod. 2012, 52, 2657-2669.
25. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J.L.; Dror, R.O.; Shaw, D.E. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 2010, 78, 1950-1958.
26. Graen, T.; Hoefling, M.; Grubmueller, H. AMBER-DYES: Characterization of Charge Fluctuations and Force Field Parameterization of Fluorescent Dyes for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 5505-5512.
27. Dupradeau, F.Y.; Cézard, C.; Lelong, R.; Stanislawiak, E.; Pêcher, J.; Delepine, J.C.; Cieplak, P. R.E.DD.B.: A database for RESP and ESP atomic charges, and force field libraries. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D360-D367.
28. Dupradeau, F.Y.; Pigache, A.; Zaffran, T.; Savineau, C.; Lelong, R.; Grivel, N.; Lelong, D.; Rosanski, W.; Cieplak, P. The R.E.D. tools: Advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 7821-7839.
29. AMBER Parameter Database. Available online: http://www.pharmacy.manchester.ac.uk/bryce/ amber/ (accessed on 20 July 2014).
30. Marvin 14.8.25.0. ChemAxon 2014. Available online: http://www.chemaxon.com (accessed on 30 November 2014).
31. Case, D.; Babin, V.; Berryman, J.; Betz, R.; Cai, Q.; Cerutti, D.; Cheatham, T., III; Darden, T.; Duke, R.; Gohlke, H.; et al. Amber 14. University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2014.
32. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian09 Revision A.02; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
33. Stavenger, R.A.;Winterhalter, M. TRANSLOCATION Project: How to Get Good Drugs into Bad Bugs. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 228ed7.
34. Nikaido, H. Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: Permeability barriers and active efflux. Science 1994, 264, 382-388.
35. Ceccarelli, M.; Ruggerone, P. Physical insights into permeation of and resistance to antibiotics in bacteria. Curr. Drug Targ. 2008, 9, 779-788.
36. Wang, J.; Wolf, R.M.; Caldwell, J.W.; Kollman, P.A.; Case, D.A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157-1174.
37. Bolton, E.E.; Wangand, Y.; Thiessenand, P.A.; Bryant, S.H. PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities. Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 2008, 4, 217-241.
38. Kohn, W. Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter-wave functions and density functionals. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, 1253-1266.
39. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
40. Kim, K.; Jordan, K.D. Comparison of Density Functional and MP2 Calculations on the Water Monomer and Dimer. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 10089-10094.
41. Pople, J.A. Quantum Chemical Models (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1894-1902.
42. Malloci, G.; Joblin, C.; Mulas, G. On-line database of the spectral properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chem. Phys. 2007, 332, 353-359.
43. Malloci, G.; Cappellini, G.; Mulas, G.; Mattoni, A. Electronic and optical properties of families of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A systematic (time-dependent) density functional theory study. Chem. Phys. 2011, 384, 19-27.
44. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999-3094.
45. O'Boyle, N.M.; Tenderholt, A.L.; Langner, K.M. cclib: A library for package-independent computational chemistry algorithms. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 839-845.
46. Allouche, A.R. Gabedit - A graphical user interface for computational chemistry softwares. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 174-182.
47. Singh, U.C.; Kollman, P.A. An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129-145.
48. Breneman, C.M.; Wiberg, K.B. Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 361-373.
49. Bayly, C.I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W.; Kollman, P.A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: The RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269-10280.
50. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P.A.; Case, D.A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2006, 25, 247-260.
51. Cheng, T.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Lin, F.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Lai, L. Computation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients by Guiding an Additive Model with Knowledge. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 2140-2148.
52. Pyrkov, T.V.; Chugunov, A.O.; Krylov, N.A.; Nolde, D.E.; Efremov, R.G. PLATINUM: A web tool for analysis of hydrophobic/hydrophilic organization of biomolecular complexes. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1201-1202.
53. Jorgensen, W.L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J.D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M.L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935.
54. Joung, I.S.; Cheatham, T.E. Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9020-9041.
55. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Postma, J.P.M.; van Gunsteren, W.F.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J.R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.
56. Loncharich, R.J.; Brooks, B.R.; Pastor, R.W. Langevin dynamics of peptides: The frictional dependence of isomerization rates of N-acetylalanyl-N0-methylamide. Biopolymers 1992, 32, 523-535.
57. Roe, D.R.; Cheatham, T.E. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3084-3095.
58. Nag, A.; Chakraborty, D.; Chandra, A. Effects of ion concentration on the hydrogen bonded structure of water in the vicinity of ions in aqueous NaCl solutions. J. Chem. Sci. 2008, 120, 71-77.
59. Luzar, A.; Chandler, D. Effect of Environment on Hydrogen Bond Dynamics in Liquid Water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 76, 928-931.
60. Luzar, A.; Chandler, D. Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid Water. Nature 1996, 379, 55-57.
61. Sutmann, G.; Vallauri, R. Hydrogen bonded clusters in the liquid phase: I. Analysis of the velocity correlation function of water triplets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1998, 10, 9231-9240.
62. Chandra, A. Effects of Ion Atmosphere on Hydrogen-Bond Dynamics in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 768-771.
63. Shao, J.; Tanner, S.W.; Thompson, N.; Cheatham, T.E. Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 2312-2334.
64. van der Spoel, D.; van Buuren, A.R.; Apol, E.; Meulenhoff, P.J.; Tieleman, D.P.; Sijbers, A.L.T.M.; Hess, B.; Feenstra, K.A.; Lindahl, E.; van Drunen, R.; Berendsen, H.J.C. Gromacs User Manual version 3.0. Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. 2001. Available online: http://www.gromacs.org (accessed on 29 June 2014).
65. Bonomi, M.; Branduardi, D.; Bussi, G.; Camilloni, C.; Provasi, D.; Raiteri, P.; Donadio, D.; Marinelli, F.; Pietrucci, F.; Broglia, R.A.; Parrinello, M. PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Comput. Phys. Comm. 2009, 180, 1961-1972.
66. Theodorou, D.N.; Suter, U.W. Shape of unperturbed linear polymers: Polypropylene. Macromolecules 1985, 18, 1206-1214.
67. O'Boyle, N.; Banck, M.; James, C.; Morley, C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Hutchison, G. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminf. 2011, 3, doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-33.
68. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3, Schrödinger, LLC, Mannheim, Germany.
69. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33-38.
70. Kumar, A.; Hajjar, E.; Ruggerone, P.; Ceccarelli, M. Molecular simulations reveal the mechanism and the determinants for ampicillin translocation through OmpF. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9608-9616.
71. Hajjar, E.; Bessonov, A.; Molitor, A.; Kumar, A.; Mahendran, K.R.;Winterhalter, M.; Pagès, J.M.; Ruggerone, P.; Ceccarelli, M. Toward screening for antibiotics with enhanced permeation properties through bacterial porins. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 6928-6935.
72. Lou, H.; Chen, M.; Black, S.S.; Bushell, S.R.; Ceccarelli, M.; Mach, T.; Beis, K.; Low, A.S.; Bamford, V.A.; Booth, I.R.; Bayley, H.; Naismith, J.H. Altered Antibiotic Transport in OmpC Mutants Isolated from a Series of Clinical Strains of Multi-Drug Resistant E. coli. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25825.
73. Collu, F.; Vargiu, A.V.; Dreier, J.; Cascella, M.; Ruggerone, P. Recognition of Imipenem and Meropenem by the RND-Transporter MexB Studied by Computer Simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19146-19158.
74. Vargiu, A.V.; Nikaido, H. Multidrug binding properties of the AcrB efflux pump characterized by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20637-20642.
75. Vargiu, A.V.; Ruggerone, P.; Opperman, T.J.; Nguyen, S.T.; Nikaido, H. Molecular Mechanism of MBX2319 Inhibition of Escherichia coli AcrB Multidrug Efflux Pump and Comparison with Other Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 6224-6234.
76. JSmol: An Open-Source HTML5 Viewer for Chemical Structures in 3D. Available online: http://wiki.jmol.org/index.php/JSmol#JSmol (accessed on 27 March 2015).
77. Ruiz-Carmona, S.; Alvarez-Garcia, D.; Foloppe, N.; Garmendia-Doval, A.B.; Juhos, S.; Schmidtke, P.; Barril, X.; Hubbard, R.E.; Morley, S.D. rDock: A Fast, Versatile and Open Source Program for Docking Ligands to Proteins and Nucleic Acids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003571.
78. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455-461.
79. Zacharias, M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 1271-1282.
80. Zacharias, M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20, 180-186.
81. Bonvin, A. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2006, 16, 194-200.
82. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: A practical alternative. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 178-184.
83. Andrusier, N.; Mashiach, E.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H.J. Principles of flexible protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 73, 271-289.
84. B-Rao, C.; Subramanian, J.; Sharma, S.D. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14, 394-400.
85. Yuriev, E.; Agostino, M.; Ramsland, P.A. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review. J. Mol. Recognit. 2011, 24, 149-164.
86. Sinko, W.; Lindert, S.; McCammon, J.A. Accounting for Receptor Flexibility and Enhanced Sampling Methods in Computer-Aided Drug Design. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2013, 81, 41-49.
87. Cavasotto, C.N.; Orry, A.J.W. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 7, 1006-1014.
88. Amaro, R.E.; Baron, R.; McCammon, J.A. An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design. J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 693-705.
89. Vargiu, A.V.; Collu, F.; Schulz, R.; Pos, K.M.; Zacharias, M.; Kleinekathöfer, U.; Ruggerone, P. Effect of the F610A Mutation on Substrate Extrusion in the AcrB Transporter: Explanation and Rationale by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10704-10707.
90. Asthana, S.; Shukla, S.; Ruggerone, P.; Vargiu, A.V. Molecular Mechanism of Viral Resistance to a Potent Non-nucleoside Inhibitor Unveiled by Molecular Simulations. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 6941-6953.
91. Cha, H.J.; Müller, R.T.; Pos, K.M. Switch-Loop Flexibility Affects Transport of Large Drugs by the Promiscuous AcrB Multidrug Efflux Transporter. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4767-4772.
92. Ruggerone, P.; Murakami, S.; Pos, K.M.; Vargiu, A.V. RND efflux pumps: Structural information translated into function and inhibition mechanisms. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 3079-3100.
93. Li, X.Z.; Nikaido, H. Efflux-Mediated Drug Resistance in Bacteria An Update. Drugs 2009, 69, 1555-1623.
94. Blair, J.; Richmond, G.; Piddock, L. Multidrug efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria and their role in antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 1165-1177.
95. Lomovskaya, O.; Zgurskaya, H.I.; Totrov, M.;Watkins, W.J. Waltzing transporters and 'the dance macabre' between humans and bacteria. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 56-65.
96. Poole, K. Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 20-51.
97. Nikaido, H.; Pagés, J.M. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 340-363.
98. Chemicalize. ChemAxon 2014. Available online: http://www.chemicalize.org (accessed on 29 January 2014).
99. Hamelberg, D.; Mongan, J.; McCammon, J.A. Accelerated molecular dynamics: A promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 11919-11929.
100. Sugita, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314, 141-151.
101. Fukunishi, H.;Watanabe, O.; Takada, S. On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 9058-9067.
102. Laio, A.; Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12562-12566.