AMBER-DYES: Characterization of charge fluctuations and force field parameterization of fluorescent dyes for molecular dynamics simulations

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 5505-5512

  Graen, Timo ^a   Hoefling, Martin ^a   Grubmüller, Helmut ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916232194     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct500869p     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Schuler, B.; Hofmann, H. Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein folding dynamics: Expanding scope and timescales. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2013, 23, 36-47.
2. Schuler, B.; Eaton, W. A. Protein folding studied by single-molecule FRET. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 16-26.
3. Lindhoud, S.; Westphal, A. H.; Visser, A. J.; Borst, J. W.; van Mierlo, C. P. Fluorescence of Alexa Fluor dye tracks protein folding. PloS One 2012, 7, e46838.
4. Preus, S.; Wilhelmsson, L. M. Advances in quantitative FRET-based methods for studying nucleic acids. ChemBioChem. 2012, 13, 1990-2001.
5. Stryer, L.; Haugland, R. P. Energy transfer: A spectroscopic ruler. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1967, 58, 719.
6. Schuler, B.; Lipman, E. A.; Steinbach, P. J.; Kumke, M.; Eaton, W. A. Polyproline and the spectroscopic ruler: Revisited with single-molecule fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 2754-2759.
7. Best, R. B.; Merchant, K. A.; Gopich, I. V.; Schuler, B.; Bax, A.; Eaton, W. A. Effect of exibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 18964-18969.
8. Piston, D. W.; Kremers, G.-J. Fluorescent protein FRET: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32, 407-414.
9. Muñoz-Losa, A.; Curutchet, C.; Krueger, B. P.; Hartsell, L. R.; Mennucci, B. Fretting about FRET: Failure of the ideal dipole approximation. Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 4779-4788.
10. VanBeek, D. B.; Zwier, M. C.; Shorb, J. M.; Krueger, B. P. Fretting about FRET: Correlation between innodatak and R. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 4168-4178.
11. Vaiana, A. C.; Neuweiler, H.; Schulz, A.; Wolfrum, J.; Sauer, M.; Smith, J. C. Fluorescence quenching of dyes by tryptophan: Interactions at atomic detail from combination of experiment and computer simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14564-14572.
12. Hoeing, M.; Grubmüller, H. In silico FRET from simulated dye dynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013, 184, 841-852.
13. Hoeing, M.; Lima, N.; Haenni, D.; Seidel, C. A. M.; Schuler, B.; Grubmüller, H. Structural heterogeneity and quantitative FRET efficiency distributions of polyprolines through a hybrid atomistic simulation and Monte Carlo approach. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19791.
14. Woźniak, A. K.; Schröder, G. F.; Grubmüller, H.; Seidel, C. A.; Oesterhelt, F. Singlemolecule FRET measures bends and kinks in DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 18337-18342.
15. Klose, D.; Klare, J. P.; Grohmann, D.; Kay, C. W.; Werner, F.; Steinhoff, H.-J. Simulation vs reality: A comparison of in silico distance predictions with DEER and FRET measurements. PloS One 2012, 7, e39492.
16. Corry, B.; Jayatilaka, D. Simulation of structure, orientation, and energy transfer between AlexaFluor molecules attached to MscL. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 2711-2721.
17. Schröder, G. F.; Alexiev, U.; Grubmüller, H. Simulation of fluorescence anisotropy experiments: Probing protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 3757-3770.
18. Allen, L. R.; Paci, E. Simulation of uorescence resonance energy transfer experiments: Effect of the dyes on protein folding. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2010, 22, 235103.
19. Vaiana, A. C.; Schulz, A.; Wolfrum, J.; Sauer, M.; Smith, J. C. Molecular mechanics force field parameterization of the uorescent probe rhodamine 6G using automated frequency matching. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 632-639.
20. Woźniak, A. K.; Nottrott, S.; Kühn-Hölsken, E.; Schröder, G. F.; Grubmüller, H.; Lührmann, R.; Am Seidel, C.; Oesterhelt, F. Detecting protein-induced folding of the U4 snRNA kink-turn by single-molecule multiparameter FRET measurements. RNA 2005, 11, 1545-1554.
21. Speelman, A. L.; Munoz-Losa, A.; Hinkle, K. L.; VanBeek, D. B.; Mennucci, B.; Krueger, B. P. Using molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics calculations to model fluorescence observables. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 3997-4008.
22. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197.
23. Jorgensen, W. L.; Maxwell, D. S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225-11236.
24. MacKerell, A. D.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R.; Evanseck, J.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S. a. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616.
25. Schmid, N.; Eichenberger, A. P.; Choutko, A.; Riniker, S.; Winger, M.; Mark, A. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7. Eur. Biophys. J. 2011, 40, 843-856.
26. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of multiple AMBER force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 65, 712-725.
27. Sorin, E. J.; Pande, V. S. Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 2472-2493.
28. DePaul, A. J.; Thompson, E. J.; Patel, S. S.; Haldeman, K.; Sorin, E. J. Equilibrium conformational dynamics in an RNA tetraloop from massively parallel molecular dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4856-4867.
29. Gao, J.; Luque, F.; Orozco, M. Induced dipole moment and atomic charges based on average electrostatic potentials in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 2975-2982.
30. Cerutti, D. S.; Rice, J. E.; Swope, W. C.; Case, D. A. Derivation of fixed partial charges for amino acids accommodating a specific water model and implicit polarization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 2328-2338.
31. Brustad, E. M.; Lemke, E. A.; Schultz, P. G.; Deniz, A. A. A general and efficient method for the site-speciffic dual-labeling of proteins for single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17664-17665.
32. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435-447.
33. Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157-1174.
34. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Antechamber: An accessory software package for molecular mechanical calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 222, U403-U403.
35. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2006, 25, 247-260.
36. da Silva, A. W. S.; Vranken, W. F. ACPYPE-Antechamber python parser interface. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 367.
37. Bayly, C. I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W.; Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: The RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269-10280.
38. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935.
39. Bussi, G.; Donadio, D.; Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 014101.
40. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, .; Foresman, J. B; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2009.
41. Hertwig, R. H.; Koch, W. On the parameterization of the local correlation functional. What is Becke-3-LYP? Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 345-351.
42. Van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1701-1718.
43. Pronk, S.; Páall, S.; Schulz, R.; Larsson, P.; Bjelkmar, P.; Apostolov, R.; Shirts, M. R.; Smith, J. C.; Kasson, P. M.; van der Spoel, D. GROMACS 4.5: A high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 845-854.
44. Behnel, S.; Bradshaw, R.; Citro, C.; Dalcin, L.; Seljebotn, D.; Smith, K. Cython: The best of both worlds. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2011, 13, 31-39.
45. Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M.; Kollman, P. A. Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431-439.
46. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Kollmann, P. A. Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9620-9631.
47. Oliphant, T. E. Python for scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 10-20.
48. Duan, Y.; Wu, C.; Chowdhury, S.; Lee, M. C.; Xiong, G.; Zhang, W.; Yang, R.; Cieplak, P.; Luo, R.; Lee, T. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1999-2012.
49. MacKerell, A. D.; Banavali, N.; Foloppe, N. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 2000, 56, 257-265.
50. Bjelkmar, P.; Larsson, P.; Cuendet, M. A.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. Implementation of the CHARMM force field in GROMACS: Analysis of protein stability effects from correction maps, virtual interaction sites, and water models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 459-466.
51. Ponder, J. W.; Case, D. A. Force fields for protein simulations. Adv. Protein Chem. 2003, 66, 27-86.
52. Gao, J.; Pavelites, J. J.; Habibollazadeh, D. Simulation of liquid amides using a polarizable intermolecular potential function. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2689-2697.
53. Gao, J.; Habibollazadeh, D.; Shao, L. A polarizable intermolecular potential function for simulation of liquid alcohols. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 16460-16467.
54. Shi, Y.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, J.; Best, R.; Wu, C.; Ponder, J. W.; Ren, P. Polarizable atomic multipole-based AMOEBA force field for proteins. J. Chem. Theory and Comp. 2013, 9, 4046-4063.
55. Schropp, B.; Tavan, P. The polarizability of point-polarizable water models: Density functional theory/molecular mechanics results. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 6233-6240.
56. Geerke, D. P.; Thiel, S.; Thiel, W.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Combined QM/MM molecular dynamics study on a condensed-phase SN2 reaction at nitrogen: The effect of explicitly including solvent polarization. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2007, 3, 1499-1509.
57. Lamoureux, G.; Roux, B. Modeling induced polarization with classical Drude oscillators: Theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 3025-3039.
58. Lamoureux, G.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Roux, B. A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 5185-5197.
59. Vosmeer, C. R.; Rustenburg, A. S.; Rice, J. E.; Horn, H. W.; Swope, W. C.; Geerke, D. P. QM/MM-based fitting of atomic polarizabilities for use in condensedphase biomolecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3839-3853.
60. Lopes, P. E.; Huang, J.; Shim, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, H.; Roux, B.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Polarizable force field for peptides and proteins based on the classical Drude oscillator. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 5430-5449.