The contextual study of literature and culture, globalization, and digital humanities

Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-35

  De Zepetnek, Steven Tötösy ^a   Vasvári, Louise O ^b,c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940993351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/UPO9789382993803.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (271)

1. Abdel-Messih, Marie-Thérèse. “Comparative Literature in Arabic.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 231–238.
2. Ahmed, Siraj. “Notes from Babel: Toward a Colonial History of Comparative Literature.” Critical Inquiry 39.2 (2013): 296–326.
3. Aldridge, Owen A., ed. The Reemergence of World Literature: A Study of Asia and the West. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1986.
4. Apter, Emily. The Translation Zone: A New Comparative Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.
5. Ascari, Maurizio. Literature of the Global Age: A Critical Study of Transcultural Narratives. Jefferson: McFarland, 2011.
6. Bachmann-Medick, Doris. Cultural Turns: Neue Orientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2006.
7. Bassnett, Susan. Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
8. Bathrick, David. “Cultural Studies.” Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literature. Ed. Joseph Gibaldi. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1992. 320–40.
9. Beecroft, Alexander J. “World Literature without a Hyphen: Towards a Typology of Literary Systems.” New Left Review 54 (2008): 87–100.
10. Benvenuti, Giuliana, and Remo Ceserani. La letteratura nell’età globale. Bologna: Mulino, 2012.
11. Berlina, Alexandra, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. “Comparative Literature in Russian and in Central and East Europe.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 337–352.
12. Berry, David M., ed. Understanding Digital Humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
13. Berubé, Michael, ed. The Aesthetics of Cultural Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
14. Birus, Hendrik. “Main Features of Goethe’s Concept of World Literature.” Comparative Literature Now: Theories and Practice /La Littérature comparée à l’heure actuelle. Théories et réalisations. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, Milan V. Dimić, and Irene Sywenky. Paris: Honoré Champion, 1999. 31–41.
15. Böhme, Hartmut, and Klaus R. Scherpe, eds. Literatur und Kulturwissenschaften. Positionen, Theorien, Modelle. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1996.
16. Böhme, Hartmut, Peter Matussek, and Lothar Müller, eds. Orientierung Kulturwissenschaft. Was sie kann, was sie will. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2000.
17. Borgman, Christine L. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge: MIT P, 2007.
18. Bourdieu, Pierre. “Questions of Method.” Empirical Studies of Literature. Ed. Elrud Ibsch, Dick Schram, and Gerard Steen. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1991. 19–36.
19. Bremond, Claude, Joshua Landy, and Thomas Pavel, eds. Thematics: New Approaches. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995.
20. Brown, Marshall. “Encountering the World.” Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature.
21. Ed. Ning Wang. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 349–65.
22. Burns, Rob, ed. German Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995.
23. Carroll, Michael Thomas, ed. No Small World: Visions and Revisions of World Literature. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1996.
24. Caruth, Cathy, and Jonathan Culler, eds. Literary Criticism for the Twenty-first Century. Special issue PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 125.4 (2010): 899–1152.
25. Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Trans. M.B. DeBevoise. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007.
26. Casanova, Pascale, ed. Les Littératures combatives. L’Internationale de nationalismes des littératures. Paris: Hermann, 2011.
27. Chalard-Fillaudeau, Anne, ed. Etude et sciences de la culture. Une résistance française? Special Issue Revue d’Etudes Culturelles 5 (2010): 1–181.
28. Cheng, Chin-Chuan, I-Chun Wang, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, eds. Cultural Discourse in Taiwan. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen UP, 2009.
29. Cometa, Michele. Studi Culturali. Napoli: Via Port’Alba, 2010.
30. Couldry, Nick. Inside Culture: Re-imagining the Method of Cultural Studies. London: Sage, 2000.
31. Crescenzi, Luca. “‘Cultural studies’ e ‘Kulturwissenschaft.’ Contributi per un dibattito aperto.” Cultural Studies.
32. Ed. Massimo Egidi. Special Issue Osservatorio Critico della germanistica 7 (2000): 2–9.
33. Cronin, Michael. Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge, 2003.
34. Dagnino, Arianna. “Comparative Literary Studies in the Twenty-first Century: Towards a Transcultural Perspective?” Ed. International Centre for Muslim and Non-Muslim Understanding. Mawson Lakes: U of South Australia, 2011. 1–16.
35. Damrosch, David. How to Read World Literature. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
36. Damrosch, David. “Hugo Meltzl and ‘The Principle of Polyglottism’.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Theo D’haen, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir. London: Routledge, 2012. 12–20.
37. Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003.n
38. Damrosch, David. “World Literature as Alternative Discourse.” Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature.
39. Ed. Ning Wang. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 307–17.
40. Damrosch, David, ed. Teaching World Literature. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2009.
41. Damrosch, David, Natalie Melas, and Mbongiseni Buthelezi, eds. The Princeton Sourcebook in Comparative Literature: From the European Enlightenment to the Global Present. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2009.
42. Delabastita, Dirk, Lieven D’hulst, and Reine Meylaerts, eds. Functional Approaches to Culture and Translation: Selected Papers by José Lambert. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.
43. Denham, Scott, Irene Kacandes, and Jonathan Petropoulos, eds. A User’s Guide to German Cultural Studies. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1997.
44. Denzin, Norman K. Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
45. Detienne, Marcel. “What is the Use of Comparison?” Comparing the Incomparable. By Marcel Detienne. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2008. 36–39.
46. D’haen, Theo. The Routledge Concise History of World Literature. London: Routledge, 2012.
47. D’haen, Theo, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir, eds. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. London: Routledge, 2012.
48. D’haen, Theo, César Domínguez, and Mads Thomsen Rosendahl, eds. World Literature: A Reader. London: Routledge, 2012.
49. Dimock, Wai Chee. “World Literature on Facebook.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 126.3 (2011): 730–36.
50. Domínguez, César. “Dionýz Ďurišin and a Systemic Theory of World Literature.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Theo D’haen, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir. London: Routledge, 2012. 99–107.
51. Donoghue, Frank. The Last Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities. New York: Fordham UP, 2008.
52. Downing, John D.H. “Cultural Studies, Communication and Change: Eastern Europe to the Urals.” Cultural Studies in Question. Ed. Marjorie Ferguson and Peter Golding. London: Sage, 1997. 187–204.
53. Ďurišin, Dionýz. Theory of Interliterary Process. Trans. Jessie Kocmanová and Zdenek Pistek. Bratislava: Slovak Academy of Sciences, 1989.
54. Ďurišin, Dionýz. Theory of Literary Comparatistics. Trans. Jessie Kocmanová. Bratislava: Slovak Academy of Sciences, 1984.
55. Ďurišin, Dionýz. Vergleichende Literaturforschung. Versuch eines methodisch-theoretischen Grundrisses. Berlin: Akademie, 1976.
56. Ďurišin, Dionýz, and Armando Gnisci, eds. Il Mediterraneo. Una rete interletteraria /La Médéterranée. Un réseau interlittéraire /Sterdomorie medziliterárna siet’. Roma: Bulzoni, 2000.
57. Elkhadem, Saad. The York Companion to Themes and Motifs of World Literature: Mythology, History, and Folklore. Fredericton: York P, 1981.
58. Eoyang, Eugene. The Promise and Premise of Creativity: Why Comparative Literature Matters. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
59. Error, Gvozden. “Qu’est-ce qu’on compare en littérature comparée. L’Innovation en tant que desintegration (résumé).” Filološki pregled 40.2 (2003): 86–92.
60. Estivals, Robert, Jean Meyriat, and François Richaudeau. Les Sciences de l’écrit. Encyclopédie internationale de bibliologie. Paris: Retz, 1993.
61. Evans, Leighton, and Sian Rees. “An Interpretation of Digital Humanities.” Understanding Digital Humanities. Ed. David M. Berry. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 21–41.
62. Even-Zohar, Itamar. Polysystem Studies. Special Issue Poetics Today 11.1 (1990): 1–268.
63. Fassel, Horst, ed. Hugo Meltzl und die Anfänge der Komparatistik. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2005.
64. Fieromonte, Domenico. “Towards a Cultural Critique of the Digital Humanities.” Special Issue Controversies around the Digital Humanities. Ed. Manfred Thaller. Historical Social Research /Historische Sozialforshung 37.3 (2012): 59–76.
65. Figueira, Dorothy M. “Comparative Literature versus World Literature.” The Comparatist 34 (2010): 29–36.
66. Finger, Anke. “Comparative Literature and Interart Studies.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 124–137.
67. Finney, Gail. “Elitism or Eclecticism?: Some Thoughts about the Future of Comparative Literature.” symploke: a journal for the intermingling of literary, cultural, and theoretical scholarship 16.1–2 (2008): 215–25.
68. Ferguson, Marjorie, and Peter Golding. “Cultural Studies and Changing Times: An Introduction.” Cultural Studies in Question. Ed. Marjorie Ferguson and Peter Golding. London: Sage, 1997. xiii–xxvii.
69. Forbes, Jill, and Michael Kelly, eds. French Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996.
70. Forgacs, David, and Robert Lumley, ed. Italian Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996.
71. Flotow, Luise von. Translation and Gender: Translating in the “Era of Feminism.” Ottawa: U of Ottawa P, 1996.
72. Foster, John Burt. “Comparative Scholarship/Worldly Teaching.” The Comparatist 34 (2010): 21–28.
73. Franco, Jean. “Cultural Studies.” Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2007. 209–24.
74. Fredrickson, George M. “Introduction.” The Comparative Imagination: On the History of Racism, Nationalism, and Social Movements. By George M. Fredrickson. Berkeley: U of California P, 1997. 1–19.
75. Frow, John, and Meaghan Morris, eds. Australian Cultural Studies: A Reader. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1993.
76. Gálik, Marián. “Interliterariness as a Concept in Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2003. 34–44.
77. Gallagher, Mary, ed. World Writing: Poetics, Ethics, Globalization. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2008.
78. Garber, Marjorie. The Use and Abuse of Literature. New York: Pantheon Books, 2011.
79. Gillespie, Gerald. “Comparative Literature in the United States.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 353–369.
80. Ginsberg, Benjamin. The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011.
81. Glaser, Renate, and Matthias Luserke, eds. Literaturwissenschaft - Kulturwissenschaft. Positionen - Themen - Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher, 1996.
82. GMH [G.M. Hyde]. “Comparative Literature.” The Routledge Dictionary of Literary Terms. Ed. Peter Childs and Roger Fowler. London: Routledge, 2005. 29–31.
83. Gold, Matthew K., ed. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2012.
84. Gossens, Peter. Weltliteratur. Modelle transnationaler Literaturwahrnehmung im 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2011.
85. Gould, Rebecca. “The Geography of Comparative Literature.” Journal of Literary Theory 5.2 (2011): 167–86.
86. Gould, Rebecca. “World Literature as a Communal Apartment: Semyon Lipkin’s Ethics of Translational Difference.” Translation and Literature 21 (2012): 401–22.
87. Grabovszki, Ernst. “The Impact of Globalization and the New Media on the Notion of World Literature.” Comparative Literature and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2003. 45–57.
88. Graham, Helen, and Jo Labanyi. Spanish Cultural Studies: The Struggle for Modernity. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995.
89. Grigorian, Natasha, Thomas Baldwin, and Margaret Rigaud-Drayton, eds. Text and Image in Modern European Culture. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2012.
90. Grossberg, Lawrence. “The Cultural Studies Crossroads Blues.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 1.1 (1998): 65–82.
91. Grossberg, Lawrence, Cary Nelson, and Paula Treichler, eds. Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 1992.
92. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. “Dysphoria: How (Some) Scholars Feel about Literary Studies.” The Future of Literary Studies /L’Avenir des Etudes littéraires.
93. Ed. Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht and Walter Moser. Special Issue Canadian Review of Comparative Literature /Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 26.3–4 (2001): 12–22.
94. Gupta, Suman. Globalization and Literature. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
95. Hacker, Andrew, and Claudia Dreifus. Higher Education? How Colleges are Wasting our Money and Failing Our Kids and What We Can Do About It. New York: Times Books, 2010.
96. Hall, Donald E., ed. Professions: Conversations on the Future of Literary and Cultural Studies. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2001.
97. Hansen, Mark B.N. New Philosophy for New Media. Cambridge: MIT P, 2004.
98. Hepp, Andreas. Cultural Studies und Medienanalyse. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS, 2004.
99. Hermans, Theo. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained. Manchaster: St. Jerome’s Publishing, 1999.
100. Highmore, Ben. A Passion for Cultural Studies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009.
101. Hillis Miller, J. “Globalization and World Literature.” Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature.
102. Ed. Ning Wang. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 251–65.
103. Hillis Miller, J. “Will Comparative Literature Survive the Globalization of the University and the New Regime of Telecommunications?” Comparative Literature: Issues and Methods /La Littérature Comparée: Questions et Méthodes. Ed. Lisa Block de Behar. Montevideo: Fundación Fontaina Minelli, 2000. 245–66.
104. Hirsch, Brett D., ed. Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Practices, Principles and Politics. Cambridge: OpenBook Publishers, 2012.
105. Horak, Roman. “Cultural Studies in Germany (and Austria) and Why There is No Such Thing.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 2.1 (1999): 109–15.
106. Horak, Roman. Die Praxis der Cultural Studies. Wien: Löcker, 2002.
107. Hynes-Berry, Mary, and Basia C. Miller. Responding to Literature: World Literature. Evanston: McDougal, Littell, and Company, 1992.
108. Ilo, Isaiah. “African Literatures as World Literatures.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 219–230.
109. Inglis, Fred. Raymond Williams. London: Routledge, 1995.
110. Inman, James A. Electronic Collaboration in the Humanities: Issues and Options. London: Routledge, 2004.
111. Ivanov, V. (Иванов, V.). Сравнительное литературоведение Всемирная литература Стиховедение (Comparative Literature, World Literature, Prosody). Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture P, 2004.
112. Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. “Intermediality.” International Encyclopedia of Communication.
113. Ed. Wolfgang Donsbach. Malden: Blackwell Science, 2008. Vol. 6, 2385–87.
114. Jordan, Barry, and Rikki Morgan-Tamosunas, eds. Contemporary Spanish Cultural Studies. London: Arnold, 2000.
115. Joret, Paul, and Aline Ramael, eds. Language and Beyond /Le Language et ses au-delà: Actuality, Virtuality in the Relations between Word, Image and Sound /Actualité et virtualité dans les rapports entre le verbe, l’image et le son. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.
116. Jullien, Dominique, ed. Foundational Texts of World Literature. Bern: Peter Lang, 2011.
117. Juvan, Marko. Svetovne književnosti in obrobja (World Literatures and Peripheries). Ljubljana: Slovene Academy of Sciences, 2012.
118. Kang, Myungkoo. “East Asian Modernities and the Formation of Media and Cultural Studies.” The Sage Handbook of Media Studies. Ed. John D.H. Dowling. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2004. 271–88.
119. Kang, Myungkoo. “There is No South Korea in South Korean Cultural Studies: Beyond the Colonial Conditions of Knowledge Production.” Journal of Communicative Inquiry 28.3 (2004): 253–68.
120. Kelly, Catriona, and David Shepherd, eds. Russian Cultural Studies. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998.
121. Kennedy, Michael D., ed. Envisioning Eastern Europe: Postcommunist Cultural Studies. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994.
122. Keunen, Bart, and Bart Eeckhout, eds. Literature and Society: The Function of Literary Sociology in Comparative Literature. Brussels: P Interuniversitaires Européennes, 2001.
123. Klitgard, Ida, ed. Literary Translation: World Literature of “Worlding” Literature? København: Museum Tusculanum P, 2006.
124. Kittler, Friedrich. Eine Kulturgeschichte der Kulturwissenschaft. München: Fink, 2001.
125. Konstantinović, Zoran, and Fridrun Rinner. Eine Literaturgeschichte Mitteleuropas. Innsbruck: Studien, 2003.
126. Krishnaswamy, Revathi. “Toward World Literary Knowledges: Theory in the Age of Globalization.” Comparative Literature 62.4 (2010): 399–419.
127. Kuhiwczak, Piotr, and Karin Littau, eds. A Companion to Translation Studies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2007.
128. Landow, George P. Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.
129. Lamping, Dieter. Die Idee der Weltliteratur. Ein Konzept Goethes und seine Karriere. Stuttgart: Kröner, 2010.
130. Lamping, Dieter, and Simone Frieling, eds. Allgemeinbildung. Werke der Weltliteratur. Würzburg: Arena, 2008.
131. Lamping, Dieter, and Frank Zipfel, eds. Was sollen Komparatisten Lesen? Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2005.
132. Lawall, Sarah, ed. Reading World Literature: Theory, History, Practice. Austin: U of Texas P, 1994.
133. Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. “Return to the Political.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 125.4 (2010): 916–19.
134. Lefevere, André. Translating Literature: Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature Framework. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1992.
135. Lehtonen, Mikko. “On No Man’s Land: Theses on Intermediality.” Nordicom Review 22.1 (2001): 71–83.
136. Le Hir Marie-Pierre, and Dana Strand, eds. French Cultural Studies: Criticism at the Crossroads. Albany: State U of New York P, 2000.
137. Lee, Alison, and Cate Poynton, eds. Culture & Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
138. Lee, Richard E. Life and Times of Cultural Studies: The Politics and Transformation of the Structures of Knowledge. Durham: Duke UP, 2003.
139. Lefevere, André. Translating Literature: Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature Framework. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1992.
140. Lindner, Rolf. Die Studie der Cultural Studies. Beiträge zum Zeitenbruch des Ersten Weltkrieges. Wien: Wissenschaftliche, 2000.
141. Lionnet, Françoise, and Shuh-Mei Shih, eds. Minor Transnationalism. Durham: Duke UP, 2005.
142. Lisiak, Agata Anna. Urban Cultures in (Post)Colonial Central Europe. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2010.
143. Lisiak, Agata Anna, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. “Intermediality and Cyber Visualities of Central European Cities.” Real and Virtual Cities: Intertextual and Intermedial Mindscapes. Ed. Asunción López-Varela Azcárate and Mariana Neţ. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic, 2009. 141–58.
144. López-Varela Azcárate Asuncón and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “Comparative Cultural Studies, éducation, nouveaux médias et l’interculturalisme.” Etudes et sciences de la culture. Une résistance française? Ed. Anne Chalard-Fillaudeau. Special Issue Revue d’Etudes Culturelles 5 (2010): 73–96.
145. López-Varela Azcárate Asuncón, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. “Towards Intermediality in Contemporary Cultural Practices and Education.” La intermedialidad /Intermediality. Ed. Freda Chapple. Special Issue Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación /Culture, Language and Representation 6 (2008): 65–82.
146. Lovink, Geert. Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet Culture. Cambridge: MIT P, 2002.
147. Lozano de la Pola Ana. “Gender and Genre in Comparative Literature and (Comparative) Cultural Studies.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 137–147.
148. Lubrich, Oliver. “Comparative Literature in German.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 269–283.
149. Lunenfeld, Peter. The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media. Cambridge: MIT P, 1999.
150. Lutter, Christina, and Markus Reisenleiter. Cultural Studies. Eine Einführung. Wien: Turia + Kant, 1998.
151. Lutter, Christina, and Lutz Musner, eds. Kulturstudien in Österreich. Wien: Löcker, 2003.
152. MacNeil, Maureen. “De-Centering or Re-Focusing Cultural Studies: A Response to Handel K. Wright.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 1 (1998): 57–64.
153. Marcant, Oliver. Cultural Studies. Konstanz: UKV, 2008.
154. Marno, David. “Meltzl de Lomnitz, Comparative Literature, and Philosophy.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 100–111.
155. McCarthy, Cameron, Aisha S. Durham, Laura C. Engel, Alice A. Filmer, Michael D. Giardina, and Miguel A. Lalagreca, eds. Globalizing Cultural Studies: Ethnographic Interventions in Theory, Method, and Policy. Bern: Peter Lang, 2007.
156. McCarty, Willard, ed. Text and Genre in Reconstruction. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2010.
157. McClennen, Sophia A. “Comparative Literature in Latin American Studies.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 324–336.
158. McClennen, Sophia A. “Inter-American Studies or Imperial American studies?” Comparative American Studies: An International Journal 3.4 (2005): 393–414.
159. McClennen, Sophia A., and Earl E. Fitz, eds. Comparative Cultural Studies and Latin America. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2004.
160. McNaughton, Howard, and John Newton, eds. Figuring the Pacific: Aotearoa and Pacific Cultural Studies. Christchurch: Canterbury UP, 2005.
161. McRobbie, Angela. The Uses of Cultural Studies. London: Sage, 2005.
162. Menand, Louis. The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University. New York: Norton, 2010.
163. Mignolo, Walter D. The Darker Side of Western Modernity. Durham: Duke UP, 2012.
164. Miller, Toby. “What Is and What Isn’t: Introducing … Cultural Studies.” A Companion to Cultural Studies. Ed. Toby Miller. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001. 1–19.
165. Milner, Andrew. Re-Imagining Cultural Studies: The Promise of Cultural Materialism. London: Sage, 2002.
166. Moore, Paul. “European Cultural Studies.” A Companion to Cultural Studies. Ed. Toby Moore. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001. 298–314.
167. Moreiras, Alberto. The Exhaustion of Difference: The Politics of Latin American Cultural Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 2001.
168. Moriarty, Michael E. The Semiotics of World Literature. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen P, 1996.
169. Mottart, A., R. Soetaert, and B. Bonamie. “Digitization and Culture.” Interactive Educational Multimedia 8 (2004): .
170. Mufti, Aamir R. “Orientalism and the Institution of World Literatures.” Critical Inquiry 36 (2010): 458–93.
171. Musner, Lutz, and Gotthart Wunberg, eds. Kulturwissenschaften. Forshung - Praxis - Positionen. Freiburg: Rombach, 2003.
172. Musner, Lutz, Gotthart Wunberg, and Christina Lutter, eds. Cultural Turn. Zur Geschichte der Kulturwissenschaften. Wien: Turia + Kent, 2001.
173. Nalbatian, Susanne, Paul M. Matthews, and James L. McClellan, eds. The Memory Process: Neuroscientific and Humanistic Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT P, 2010.
174. Nussbaum, Martha C. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010.
175. Pala, Mauro. “Comparative Literature in Italian.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 311–323.
176. Patil, Anand Balwant. “Comparative Literature in Indian Languages.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 299–310.
177. Paz Gago, José María. “Propuestas para un replanteamiento metodológico en el estudio de las relaciones de literatura y cine. El método comparativo semiótico-textual.” Signa 13 (2004): 199–232.
178. Peterson, Richard A. “Problems in Comparative Research: The Example of Omnivorousness.” Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 33 (2005): 257–82.
179. Pinxten, Rik. “Contemporary Comparative Cultural Studies: Theory, Contexts and Trends.” Special Issue Tribes and Tribals 1 (2007): 93–99.
180. Pinxten, Rik. “Comparative Cultural Studies and Cultural Anthropology.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 112–123.
181. Pireddu, Nikoletta. “Between the Local and the Global: Comparative Literature in the Land of Dante.” Recherche Littéraire /Literary Research 25 (2009): 26–33.
182. Pizer, John. “Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: Origins and Relevance of Weltliteratur.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Theo D’haen, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir, eds. London: Routledge, 2012. 3–11.
183. Pizer, John. The Idea of World Literature: History and Pedagogical Practice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 2006.
184. Pollock, Griselda, ed. Generations and Geographies: Critical Theories and Critical Practices in Feminism and the Visual Arts. London: Routledge, 1996.
185. Porter, David. “The Crisis of Comparison and the World Literature Debates.” Profession 2011. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2011. 244–58.
186. Porter, David, ed. Internet Culture. London: Routledge, 1997.
187. Pradeau, Christophe, and Tiphaine Samoyault, eds. Où est la littérature mondiale? Vincennes: PU de Vincennes, 2005.
188. Prendergast, Catherine. Buying into English: Language and Investment in the New Capitalist World. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh, 2008.
189. Prendergast, Chistopher, ed. Debating World Literature. London: Verso, 2004.
190. Prow, John. “Australian Cultural Studies.” Postcolonial Studies 10.1 (2007): 59–75.
191. Puchner, Martin. “World Literature and the Creation of Literary Models.” Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature. Ed. Ning Wang. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 341–48.
192. Pym, Anthony. Negotiating the Frontier: Translators and Intercultures in Hispanic History. Manchester: St. Jerome, 2000.
193. Radhakrishnan, R. Theory in an Uneven World. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
194. Ramanathan, Vaidehi. The English-Vernacular Divide: Postcolonial Language Politics and Practice. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters, 2005.
195. Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996.
196. Reynolds, Sian, and William Kidd. Contemporary French Cultural Studies. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.
197. Riegler, Alexander. Radical Constructivism (1998–): .
198. Riffaterre, Michael. “On the Complementarity of Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies.” Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Ed. Charles Bernheimer. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1995. 66–73.
199. Rojek, Chris. Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Polity P, 2007.
200. Rubdy, Rani, and Mario Saraceni. English in the World. New York: Continuum, 2006.
201. Rubenstein, Hymie, and Rodney Clifton. “A New Approach to Tenure and Scholarship.” University Affairs /Affaires Universitaires 39.5 (1998): 23–24.
202. Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Virtuality and Textuality: Reading in the Electronic Age.” The Systemic and Empirical Approach to Literature and Culture as Theory and Application. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Irene Sywenky. Edmonton: Research Institute for Comparative Literature, U of Alberta and Siegen: Institute for Empirical Literature and Media Research, Siegen U, 1997. 121–36.
203. Sadowski, Piotr. Systems Theory as an Approach to the Study of Literature: Origins and Functions of Literature. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 1999.
204. Saussy, Haun. “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares: Of Memes, Hives, and Selfish Genes.” Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Ed. Haun Saussy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 2006. 3–42.
205. Saussy, Haun. “Interplanetary Literature.” Comparative Literature 63.1 (2011): 439–47.
206. Saussy, Haun. “The Dimensionality of World Literature.” Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature. Ed. Ning Wang. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 289–94.
207. Schmidt, Siegfried J. Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literature: The Components of a Basic Theory. Trans. Robert de Beaugrande. Hamburg: Buske, 1982.
208. Schmidt, Siegfried J. “From Objects to Processes: A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism.” Constructivist Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal 7.1 (2011): 1–9.
209. Schmidt, Siegfried J. “Literary Studies from Hermeneutics to Media Culture Studies.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 12.1 (2010): 1–10.
210. Schmidt, Siegfried J. Worlds of Communication: Interdisciplinary Transitions. Bern: Peter Lang, 2011.
211. Schmitz-Emans, Monika. “Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature: Issues and Methods /La Littérature Comparée: Questions et Méthodes. Ed. Lisa Block de Behar. Montevideo: Fundación Fontaina Minelli, 2000. 221–44.
212. Schreibman, Susan, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, eds. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.
213. Schreier, Margrit. “Computer-aided Qualitative Data Analysis and Its Uses in the Empirical Study of Literature.” The Systemic and Empirical Approach to Literature and Culture as Theory and Application. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Irene Sywenky. Edmonton: Research Institute for Comparative Literature, U of Alberta and Siegen: Institute for Empirical Literature and Media Research, Siegen U, 1997. 155–62.
214. Seidl, Monika, Roman Horak, and Lawrence Grossberg, eds. About Raymond Williams. London: Routledge, 2010.
215. Simon, Sherry. Gender in Translation: Cultural Identity and the Politics of Transmission. London: Routledge, 1996.
216. Simonsen, Karen-Margarethe, and Jakob Stougard-Nielsen, eds. World Literature World Culture: History, Theory, Analysis. Aarhus: Aarhus UP, 2008.
217. Soetaert, Ronald, and Kris Rutten. “Comparative Cultural Studies and Pedagogy.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 63–74.
218. Smith, Paul, ed. The Renewal of Cultural Studies. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 2011.
219. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia UP, 2003.
220. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Outside in the Teaching Machine. London: Routledge, 1993.
221. Stanford Friedman Susan. “Why Not Compare?” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 126.3 (2011): 753–62.
222. Sturm-Trigonakis, Elke. “Comparative Cultural Studies and Linguistic Hybridities in Literature.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 178–191.
223. Sturm-Trigonakis, Elke. Global playing in der Literatur. Ein Versuch über die Neue Weltliteratur. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2007.
224. Sturm-Trigonakis, Elke. Comparative Cultural Studies and the New Weltliteratur. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2013.
225. Szabolcsi, Miklós, and György M. Vajda, eds. The Place of Comparative Literature in the Literary Scholarship of Our Days: An Inquiry. Thematic Section Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 24.2 (1997): 9–123.
226. Taylor, Mark C. Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities. New York: Knopf, 2010.
227. Thomsen Rosendahl Mads. Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures. London: Continuum, 2010.
228. Tomiche, Anne. “Comparative Literature in French.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 254–268.
229. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “Aspects of Scholarship and Publishing in the Age of New Media Technology.” Literatures in the Digital Era: Theory and Praxis. Ed. Amelia Sanz and Dolores Romero. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007. 171–84.
230. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “Bibliography of Work in Contextual (Systemic and Empirical) Approaches in Comparative Cultural Studies.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture (Library): 1–61.
231. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “Comparative Cultural Studies and the Study of Central European Culture.” Comparative Central European Culture. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2002. 1–32.
232. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.
233. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “From Comparative Literature Today toward Comparative Cultural Studies.” Comparative Literature and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2003. 235–67.
234. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “Multilingual Bibliography of Books in Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 499–521.
235. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “New Media, Publishing in the Humanities, and CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture.” Formamente: Rivista Internazionale di Ricerca sul Futuro Digitale /International Research Journal on Digital Future 2.1–2 (2007): 255–73.
236. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven “Systemic Approaches to Literature: An Introduction with Selected Bibliographies.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature /Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 19.1–2 (1992): 21–93.
237. Töösy de Zepetnek, Steven. “Taxonomy for the Study of Translation in Comparative Cultural Studies.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture (Library) (2002): 1–11.
238. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven. “The Study of Translation and Comparative Literature.” Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. By Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998. 215–48.
239. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven. “The ‘Impact Factor’ and Selected Issues of Content and Technology in Humanities Scholarship Published Online.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 42.1 (2010): 70–78.
240. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “The New Humanities: The Intercultural, the Comparative, and the Interdisciplinary.” Globalization and the Futures of Comparative Literature.
241. Ed. Jan M. Ziolkowski and Alfred J. López. Thematic Section The Global South 1.2 (2007): 45–68.
242. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven. “The Study of Literature and the Electronic Age.” Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. By Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998. 249–59.
243. Tötösy de Zepetnek Steven. “The Systemic and Empirical Approach to Literature, the Polysystem Theory, and Translation Theory: The Importance of Methodology.” Studies in the Humanities 22.1–2 (1995): 12–20.
244. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven, ed. Digital Humanities and the Study of Intermediality in Comparative Cultural Studies. West Lafayette: Purdue Scholarly Publishing Services, 2013.
245. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven, and Asunción López-Varela Azcárate. “Education, Interculturalism, and Mapping a New Europe.” Mapping the World, Culture, and Border-crossing. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and I-Chun Wang. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen UP, 2010. 38–49.
246. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven, and Tutun Mukherjee, eds. Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013.
247. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven, and Louise O. Vasvári. “The Study of Hungarian Culture as Comparative Central European Cultural Studies.” Comparative Hungarian Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Louise O. Vasvári. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 2011. 11–33.
248. Tötösy de Zepetnek, Steven, and Louise O. Vasvári. “Synopsis of the Current Situation of Comparative Literature and (Comparative) Cultural Studies in the U.S. and Europe Including English-Language Italian Cultural Studies.” Special Issue Multicultural Studies. Ed. Silvia Albertazzi and Mario Domenichelli. Moderna 14.1 (2013): 12–32.
249. Trousson, Raymond. Thèmes et mythes. Questions de méthode. Bruxelles: U de Bruxelles, 1981.
250. Trousson, Raymond. Un Problème de littérature comparée. Les Etudes de thèmes. Essai de méthodologie. Paris: Lettres Modernes, 1965.
251. Tsu, Jing. “Getting Ideas about World Literature in China.” Comparative Literature Studies 47.3 (2010): 290–317.
252. Turner, Graeme. British Cultural Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1990.
253. Ursa, Mihaela. “Comparative Literature in Romania at the Digital Hour.” Caietele Echinox 20 (2011): 11–19.
254. Vandermeersche, Geert, Joachim Vlieghe, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. “Bibliography for Work in Intermediality and Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities and the Study of Intermediality in Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. West Lafayette: Purdue Scholarly Publishing Services, 2013. Forthcoming.
255. Van Dijck José. “Search Engines and the Production of Academic Knowledge.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 13.6 (2010): 574–92.
256. Van Peer, Willie, Eleana Asimakopoulou, and Nik Bessis, eds. Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies for Humanities Studies. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2010.
257. Vasvári, Louise O. “Queer Theory and Discourses of Desire.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 8.1 (2006): 1–14.
258. Vilariño Picos, María Teresa, and Anxo Abuín González. “Comparative Literature in Iberian Spanish and Portuguese.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 284–298.
259. Villanueva, Darío. “Claudio Guillén: (World) Literature as System.” The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Ed. Theo D’haen, David Damrosch, and Djelal Kadir. London: Routledge, 2012. 108–16.
260. Villanueva, Darío. “Possibilities and Limits of Comparative Literature Today.” The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Literaure and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 49–62.
261. Wallerstein, Immanuel. “World-System Analysis: Theoretical and Interpretative Issues.” World-System Analysis: Theory and Methodology. Ed. Terence K. Hopkins. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. 91–103.
262. Wang, I-Chun, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. “Introduction to Cultural Discourse in Taiwan.” Cultural Discourse in Taiwan. Ed. Chin-Chuan Cheng, I-Chun Wang, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek. Kaohsiung: National Sun Yat-sen UP, 2009. 1–9.
263. Wang, Ning. “Confronting Globalization: Cultural Studies versus Comparative Literature Studies?” neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universarum 38.2 (2011): 56–65.
264. Wang, Ning, ed. Comparative Literature: Toward a (Re)construction of World Literature. Special Issue Neohelicon: acta comparationis litterarum universum 38.2 (2011): 243–498.
265. Wang, Xiaolu, and Yan Liu. “Comparative Literature in Chinese.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 239–253.
266. White, Mimi, and James Schwoch, eds. Questions of Method in Cultural Studies. Malden: Blackwell, 2006.
267. Witt Frese, Mary Ann. Rev. of Anne Tomiche and Karl Ziegler, eds. La Recherche en littérature générale et comparée en France en 2007. Bilan et perspectives. Le Mont-Houy: PU de Valenciennes, 2007. Recherche Littéraire /Literary Research 24.47–48 (2008): 27–29.
268. Wolf, Werner. “(Inter)mediality and the Study of Literature.” Companion to Comparative Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural Studies. Ed. Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee. New Delhi: Cambridge UP India, 2013. 205–217.
269. Young, Robert J.C. “English and the Language of Others.” European Review 17.1 (2009): 203–12.
270. Zhang, Yingjin, ed. China in a Polycentric World: Essays in Chinese Comparative Literature. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.
271. Zunshine, Lisa. Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2010.