Robust reading instruction in the early grades: Conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of tier 1 and tier 2 instructional supports

Focus on Exceptional Children

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1-20

  Baker, Scott K ^a   Fien, Hank ^a   Baker, Doris Luft ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940363703     PISSN: 0015511X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17161/foec.v42i9.6693     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Archer, A. (2006, January 23). Dynamic vocabulary instruction in the elementary school. Paper presented at the Oregon Reading First, Eugene, OR.
3. Baker, D. L., Baker, S. K., Katz, R., & Otterstedt, J. (2009). The English reading performance of English learners in Oregon Reading First across three years of implementation. Retrieved from http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon. edu/
4. Baker, S. K., Gersten, R., Haager, D., & Dingle, M. (2006). Teaching practice and the reading growth of first-grade English learners: Validation of an observation instrument. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 199-220. doi: 10.1086/510655 (Pubitemid 44831878)
5. Baker, S. K., Gersten, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 77(1), 65-77.
6. Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C, & Kame'enui, E. J. (1995). Vocabulary acquisition synthesis of the research. Eugene, OR; Washington, DC: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators College of Education University of Oregon; U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement Educational Resources Information Center.
7. Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C, & Kame'enui, E. J. (1998). Vocabulary acquisition: Research bases. In D. Simmons & E. Kame'enui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs (pp. 183-218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Baker, S. K., Smith, J. M., Fien, H., Otterstedt, J., Katz, R., Baker, D. L., et al. (2007). Three year Oregon Reading First report. Retrieved from http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/
9. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J., Kame'enui, E., et al. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing high poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37.
10. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. M., Fien, H., Kame'enui, E., & Thomas Beck, C. (in press). The impact of Oregon Reading First on student reading outcomes. Elementary School Journal.
11. Baumann, J. F., & Kame'enui, E. (1991). Research on vocabulary instruction: Ode to Voltaire. In J. Flood, D. Lapp & J. Squires (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 604-632). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
12. Baumann, J. F., Kame'enui, E. J., & Ash, G. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 752-785). Mahwah, NJ: Elrlbaum.
13. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author: A fresh and expanded view of a powerful approach. New York: Scholastic.
14. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Solving problems in the teaching of literacy. New York: Guilford.
15. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2008). Creating robust vocabulary: Frequently asked questions and extended examples. New York: Guilford.
16. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
17. Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct, and sequential. American Educator, 25(1), 24-28, 47.
18. Bogdan, R. C, & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Pearson Education.
19. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230.
20. Burns, M. K., & Vanderheyden, A. (2006). Response to Intervention to assess learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 32, 3-5.
21. Carnine, D. (1992). Introduction. In D. Carnine & E. Kame'enui (Eds.), Higher order thinking: Designing curriculum for main-streamed students (pp. 1-22). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
22. Carnine, D., & Kame'enui, E. (1992). Higher order thinking: Designing curriculum for mainstreamed students Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
23. Carnine, D., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E., & Tarver, S. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24. Chard, D., Harn, B., Sugai, G., Horner, R., Simmons, D., & Kame'enui, E. (2008). Core features of multi-tiered systems of reading and behavioral support. In C. R. Greenwood, T. R. Kra-tochwill, & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 31-61). New York: Guildford.
25. Chard, D. J., & Jungjohann, K. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for success in mathematics learning, intersection: Mathematics education sharing common grounds. Houston, TX: Exxon-Mobil Foundation.
26. Clements, M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Multi-tiered prevention models: Implications and future perspectives. In C. R. Greenwood, T. R. Kratochwill, & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 269-291). New York: Guildford.
27. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrisson, K. R. B. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
28. Coyne, M., Kame'enui, E., & Carnine, D. (2006). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
29. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433-479. doi: 10.3102/00346543072003433
30. Farr, R., Tulley, M. A., & Powell, D. (1987). The evaluation and selection of basal readers. The Elementary School Journal, 57(3), 266. doi:10.1086/461494
31. Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. M., Kame'enui, E. J., & Thomas Beck, C. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to predict reading proficiency in K-2 for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 391-408.
32. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Davidson, K. C, & Thompson, N. M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 27-37.
33. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
34. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., McMaster, K. L., & Al Otaiba, S. (2005). Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (pp. 431-450). New York: Guilford Press.
35. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
36. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Zumeta, R. O. (2008). A curricular-sampling approach to progress monitoring: Mathematics concepts and applications. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 225-233. doi: 10.1177/1534508407313484
37. Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J. W. (2000). Designing high-quality research in special education: Group experimental design. Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 2-18.
38. Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., & Marks, S. U. (1998). Teaching English-language learners with learning difficulties: Guiding principles and examples from research-based practice. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
39. Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Pugach, M. C, Scanlon, D., & Chard, D. (2001). Contemporary research on special education teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 695-722). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
40. Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., & Scarcella, R. (2007). Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: A Practice Guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
41. Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1986). Direct instruction in reading comprehension. Educational Leadership, 43(1), 70-78.
42. Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 8(6), 48-56.
43. Gersten, R., Camine, D. W., & White, W. A. (1984). The pursuit of clarity: Direct instruction and applied behavior analysis. In W. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 38-57). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
44. Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors that enhance sustained use of research-based instructional practices: A historical perspective on relevant research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 444-457.
45. Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202-1242.
46. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Santoro, L. E., Dimino, J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, D. (2008). Response to Intervention (RTI) & multitier intervention for reading in the primary grades. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences.
47. Goldenberg, C, & Patthey-Chavez, G. (1995). Discourse processes in instructional conversations: Interactions between teacher and transition readers. Discourse Processes, 19(1), 57-74.
48. Good, R., Baker, S., & Peyton, J. (2009). Making sense of nonsense word fluency: Determining adequate progress in early first grade reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 33-56.
49. Good, R. H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. (2001). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (D1BELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 679-700). Washington, DC.: National Association of School Psychologists.
50. Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary booh Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, International Reading Association, and National Council of Teachers of English.
51. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C, & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill clrnQDcrDinBiin
52. Greenwood, C. R., Horner, R. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2008). Introduction. In C. R. Greenwood, T. R. Kratochwill & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 3-31). New York: Guildford Press.
53. Greenwood, C. R., Kratochwill, T. R., & Clements, M. (2008). School-wide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools. New York: Guilford Press.
54. Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C, & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 66-85.
55. Haager, D., Klinger, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Validated reading practices for three tiers of intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.
56. Haynes, N. M. (1998). Changing schools for changing times: The Comer School Development Program. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Hoffman, J. V., McCartney, S. J., Abbott, J., Christian, C, Corman, L., Curry, C, et al. (1994). So what's new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 26(1), 47-73.
58. Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 767-787.
59. Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C, & Coyne, M. D. (2000). Schools as host environments: Toward a school-wide reading improvement model. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 31-52.
60. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G., Dole, J., Krai, C. C, Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
61. Marsh, D. (1994). Change in schools: Lessons from the literature. In P. Wohlstetter & S. A. Mohrman (Eds.), School-based management: Promise and process (pp. 215-252). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 148-182.
63. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2006). Response to Intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
64. National Reading Panel. (NRP). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
65. National Research Council. (NRC). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academny Press.
66. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamorran, A. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67. O'Conner, R. (2007). Layers of intervention that affect outcomes in reading. In D. Haager, J. Klingner, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for Response to Intervention. Baltimore: Brookes.
68. Patching, W., Kameenui, E. J., Carnine, D., Gersten, R., & Colvin, G. (1983). Direct instruction in critical reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(4), 406-418.
69. Pianta, R. C, & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standarized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109-119.
70. Porter, A. C, & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Are content standards being implemented in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. In S. H. Furhman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (Vol. Part II, pp. 60-80). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education distributed by Univeristy of Chicago Press.
71. Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Advancing educational policy by advancing research on instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), pp. 206-230.
72. Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). The Brown legacy and the O'Connor challenge: Transfoming schools in the images of children's potential. Educational Researcher, 38, 169-180.
73. Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to Intervention: Prevention and remediation, perhaps. Diagnosis, no. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 44-47.
74. Simmons, D., & Kame'enui, E. (2000). A consumer's guide to evaluating a core reading program grades K-3: A critical elements analysis. Eugene: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
75. Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E., Good, R. H., m, Ham, B., Cole, C, & Braun, D. (2002). Building, implementing, and sustaining a beginning reading improvement model: Lessons learned school by school. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 537-570). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
76. Snow, C. E., Bums, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
77. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M. A., Yoder, N., Brigham, N., Nesselrodt, P., Schaffer, E., et al. (1997). Urban and suburban/rural strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Third year report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
78. Torgesen, J. K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluation what we know from research. Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1, 11-47.
79. Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Preventing early reading failure and its devastating dowward spiral. American Educator, 28, 3-21.
80. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(A), 579-593.
81. Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Peyton, J. A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 364.
82. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). A response to "Competing views: A dialogue on Response to Intervention": Why response to intervention is necessary but not sufficient for identifying students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32(1), 58.
83. Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Woodruff, A. L., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2007). Prevention and early identification of students with reading disabilities. In D. Haager, J. K. Klinger & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for reponse to intervention (pp. 11-27). Baltimore: Brookes.
84. Walker, H. M., & Shinn, M. (2002). Structuring school-based interventions to achieve integrated primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention goals for safe and effective schools. In M. R. Hill, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 1-25). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists